Adaptation of the normative rating procedure for the International Affective Picture System to a remote format.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s41155-024-00326-x
Thayane C Lemos, Laiz A A Silva, Sara D J Gaspar, Guilherme M S Coutinho, Jasmin B Stariolo, Pedro G M R Oliveira, Lethicia S Conceicao, Eliane Volchan, Isabel A David
{"title":"Adaptation of the normative rating procedure for the International Affective Picture System to a remote format.","authors":"Thayane C Lemos, Laiz A A Silva, Sara D J Gaspar, Guilherme M S Coutinho, Jasmin B Stariolo, Pedro G M R Oliveira, Lethicia S Conceicao, Eliane Volchan, Isabel A David","doi":"10.1186/s41155-024-00326-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), a pictorial scale for the measurement of pleasure and arousal dimensions of emotions, is one of the most applied tools in the emotion research field.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We present a detailed description of a remote method to collect affective ratings in response to pictures by using the SAM scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To empirically validate our remote method, we conducted a study using a digitized version of the SAM scale and delivered online didactic instructions that followed the normative rating procedure for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) to the participants. We presented 70 pictures from the IAPS and an additional set of 22 food pictures to the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found strong correlations between the ratings of IAPS pictures obtained in our sample and those reported by North American and Brazilian participants in previous in-person studies that applied the same pictures and methodology. We were also able to obtain an additional standardized set of food pictures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The protocols described here may be useful for researchers interested in collecting remotely valid and reliable affecting ratings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":"37 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00326-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), a pictorial scale for the measurement of pleasure and arousal dimensions of emotions, is one of the most applied tools in the emotion research field.

Objective: We present a detailed description of a remote method to collect affective ratings in response to pictures by using the SAM scale.

Methods: To empirically validate our remote method, we conducted a study using a digitized version of the SAM scale and delivered online didactic instructions that followed the normative rating procedure for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) to the participants. We presented 70 pictures from the IAPS and an additional set of 22 food pictures to the participants.

Results: We found strong correlations between the ratings of IAPS pictures obtained in our sample and those reported by North American and Brazilian participants in previous in-person studies that applied the same pictures and methodology. We were also able to obtain an additional standardized set of food pictures.

Conclusion: The protocols described here may be useful for researchers interested in collecting remotely valid and reliable affecting ratings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将国际情感图像系统的规范评级程序调整为远程格式。
背景:自评量表(SAM)是一种测量愉悦和唤醒维度情绪的图形量表,是情绪研究领域最常用的工具之一:我们将详细介绍一种远程方法,利用 SAM 量表收集对图片的情感评分:为了对我们的远程方法进行实证验证,我们使用数字化版本的SAM量表进行了一项研究,并按照国际情感图片系统(IAPS)的规范评分程序向参与者提供了在线教学指导。我们向参与者展示了 70 幅 IAPS 图片和另外一组 22 幅食物图片:结果:我们发现,在我们的样本中获得的对 IAPS 图片的评分与北美和巴西参与者在之前采用相同图片和方法进行的面对面研究中报告的评分之间存在很强的相关性。我们还获得了一组额外的标准化食物图片:本文所述的方案可能对有兴趣收集远程有效和可靠的影响评分的研究人员有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
期刊最新文献
The effect of state gratitude on interpersonal trust under cognitive reappraisal among Chinese college students. Parent autonomy support and undergraduates' academic engagement in online learning: the mediate role of self-regulation. Morpho-orthographic segmentation on visual word recognition in Brazilian Portuguese speakers. The gaming disorder test and gaming disorder scale for adolescents: translation and validation among Vietnamese young adults. Adaptation of the normative rating procedure for the International Affective Picture System to a remote format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1