Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of human-robot interaction self-efficacy scale in Chinese adults.

IF 1.5 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1186/s41155-024-00324-z

Huixin Gao, Wei Wang, Chengli Huang, Xinru Xie, Duming Wang, Wei Gao, Jie Cai

{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of human-robot interaction self-efficacy scale in Chinese adults.","authors":"Huixin Gao, Wei Wang, Chengli Huang, Xinru Xie, Duming Wang, Wei Gao, Jie Cai","doi":"10.1186/s41155-024-00324-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With the fast-paced advancements of robot technology, human-robot interaction (HRI) has become increasingly popular and complex, and self-efficacy in HRI has received extensive attention. Despite its popularity, this topic remains understudied in China.Objective: In order to provide a psychometrically sound instrument in China, this study aimed to translate and validate the Self-Efficacy in Human-Robot Interaction Scale (SE-HRI) in two Chinese adult samples (N1 = 300, N2 = 500).Methods: The data was analyzed by SPSS 26.0 and Amos 24.0. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted using Sample 1 data. Confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity analysis, and reliability analysis were then performed using Sample 2 data.Results: The results revealed that the Chinese SE-HRI scale consisted of 13 items in a two-factor model, suggesting a good model fit. Moreover, general self-efficacy and willingness to accept the use of artificial intelligence (AI) were both positively correlated with self-efficacy in HRI, while negative attitudes toward robots showed an inverse correlation, proving the Chinese SE-HRI scale exhibited excellent criterion-related validity.Conclusion: The Chinese SE-HRI scale is a reliable assessment tool for evaluating self-efficacy in HRI in China. The study discussed implications and limitations, and suggested future directions.","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":"37 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00324-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the fast-paced advancements of robot technology, human-robot interaction (HRI) has become increasingly popular and complex, and self-efficacy in HRI has received extensive attention. Despite its popularity, this topic remains understudied in China.

Objective: In order to provide a psychometrically sound instrument in China, this study aimed to translate and validate the Self-Efficacy in Human-Robot Interaction Scale (SE-HRI) in two Chinese adult samples (N1 = 300, N2 = 500).

Methods: The data was analyzed by SPSS 26.0 and Amos 24.0. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted using Sample 1 data. Confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity analysis, and reliability analysis were then performed using Sample 2 data.

Results: The results revealed that the Chinese SE-HRI scale consisted of 13 items in a two-factor model, suggesting a good model fit. Moreover, general self-efficacy and willingness to accept the use of artificial intelligence (AI) were both positively correlated with self-efficacy in HRI, while negative attitudes toward robots showed an inverse correlation, proving the Chinese SE-HRI scale exhibited excellent criterion-related validity.

Conclusion: The Chinese SE-HRI scale is a reliable assessment tool for evaluating self-efficacy in HRI in China. The study discussed implications and limitations, and suggested future directions.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

中文版人机交互自我效能感量表在中国成年人中的有效性和可靠性。

背景：随着机器人技术的快速发展，人机交互（HRI）变得越来越普及和复杂，人机交互中的自我效能感也受到了广泛关注。尽管它很受欢迎，但国内对这一主题的研究仍然不足：为了在中国提供一个心理测量学上可靠的工具，本研究旨在翻译并在两个中国成人样本（N1 = 300，N2 = 500）中验证人机交互自我效能感量表（SE-HRI）：数据采用 SPSS 26.0 和 Amos 24.0 进行分析。使用样本 1 的数据进行了项目分析和探索性因素分析。然后使用样本 2 数据进行了确认性因素分析、标准相关效度分析和信度分析：结果显示，中文 SE-HRI 量表由 13 个项目组成，属于双因素模型，表明模型拟合良好。此外，一般自我效能感和接受使用人工智能（AI）的意愿均与人力资源创新的自我效能感呈正相关，而对机器人的负面态度则呈反相关，这证明中国的 SE-HRI 量表具有良好的标准相关效度：结论：中国 SE-HRI 量表是评估中国人力资源创新自我效能感的可靠评估工具。研究讨论了其意义和局限性，并提出了未来的发展方向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.