Implementation and outcomes in benign gynecological surgery with HUGO™ RAS system 12 months initial experience.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02109-z
Yael Yagur, Martin A Martino, Mikhail Sarofim, Mohammed Almoqren, Hayley Anderson, Jessica Robertson, Sarah Choi, David Rosen, Danny Chou
{"title":"Implementation and outcomes in benign gynecological surgery with HUGO™ RAS system 12 months initial experience.","authors":"Yael Yagur, Martin A Martino, Mikhail Sarofim, Mohammed Almoqren, Hayley Anderson, Jessica Robertson, Sarah Choi, David Rosen, Danny Chou","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02109-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We share our experience with the Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery system in benign gynecological surgeries. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent elective robotic surgeries for benign gynecological conditions at our surgical center from February 2023 to February 2024. Data collected included patient demographics, surgery indications, and outcomes. Perioperative data on port-placement time, arm configurations, docking, and console time were documented. Procedural outcome data including troubleshooting and overall satisfaction were also recorded. The primary outcome was perioperative data on port placement, docking time, arm configuration, and console time. The secondary outcome was defined as team satisfaction, system troubleshooting, arm repositioning, and complications graded 3-4 on the Clavien-Dindo Scale. A total of 60 patients underwent procedures for benign gynecological conditions using the Hugo™ RAS over the 12-month study period, primarily for pelvic endometriosis (53%), hysterectomies (27%), and adnexal surgery (10%). The mean port-placement time was 13 min and 41 s. In 31% of cases, low-port placement was used, with arm positioning being asymmetrical in 63% and symmetrical in 37%, demonstrating the system's flexibility in customizing port configurations while optimizing cosmetic outcomes. Docking time averaged 5 min and 51 s, and console time was 1 h and 5 min. Operational challenges included arm tremors and limited workspace for the assistant. This study details our knowledge using the Hugo™ RAS. Learning curves of port placement, arm positioning, docking, and procedure time can be rapidly adapted in a well-trained team. Our experience suggests the technology is still in its learning curve period.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02109-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We share our experience with the Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery system in benign gynecological surgeries. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent elective robotic surgeries for benign gynecological conditions at our surgical center from February 2023 to February 2024. Data collected included patient demographics, surgery indications, and outcomes. Perioperative data on port-placement time, arm configurations, docking, and console time were documented. Procedural outcome data including troubleshooting and overall satisfaction were also recorded. The primary outcome was perioperative data on port placement, docking time, arm configuration, and console time. The secondary outcome was defined as team satisfaction, system troubleshooting, arm repositioning, and complications graded 3-4 on the Clavien-Dindo Scale. A total of 60 patients underwent procedures for benign gynecological conditions using the Hugo™ RAS over the 12-month study period, primarily for pelvic endometriosis (53%), hysterectomies (27%), and adnexal surgery (10%). The mean port-placement time was 13 min and 41 s. In 31% of cases, low-port placement was used, with arm positioning being asymmetrical in 63% and symmetrical in 37%, demonstrating the system's flexibility in customizing port configurations while optimizing cosmetic outcomes. Docking time averaged 5 min and 51 s, and console time was 1 h and 5 min. Operational challenges included arm tremors and limited workspace for the assistant. This study details our knowledge using the Hugo™ RAS. Learning curves of port placement, arm positioning, docking, and procedure time can be rapidly adapted in a well-trained team. Our experience suggests the technology is still in its learning curve period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 HUGO™ RAS 系统进行良性妇科手术 12 个月的初步经验。
我们分享了使用 Hugo™ 机器人辅助手术系统进行良性妇科手术的经验。我们回顾性分析了 2023 年 2 月至 2024 年 2 月期间在本外科中心接受良性妇科疾病择期机器人手术的患者。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、手术适应症和结果。记录了围手术期的端口放置时间、手臂配置、对接和控制台时间等数据。还记录了包括故障排除和总体满意度在内的手术结果数据。主要结果是端口置入、对接时间、手臂配置和控制台时间的围手术期数据。次要结果是指团队满意度、系统故障排除、手臂重新定位以及在克拉维恩-丁多量表中分级为 3-4 级的并发症。在 12 个月的研究期间,共有 60 名患者使用 Hugo™ RAS 接受了良性妇科疾病手术,主要是盆腔子宫内膜异位症(53%)、子宫切除术(27%)和附件手术(10%)。在 31% 的病例中使用了低端口置入,63% 的病例中手臂定位不对称,37% 的病例中手臂定位对称,这表明该系统可以灵活定制端口配置,同时优化美容效果。对接时间平均为 5 分钟 51 秒,控制台时间为 1 小时 5 分钟。操作挑战包括手臂震颤和助手工作空间有限。本研究详细介绍了我们使用 Hugo™ RAS 所获得的知识。在训练有素的团队中,可以迅速适应端口放置、手臂定位、对接和手术时间的学习曲线。我们的经验表明,该技术仍处于学习曲线期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
A review of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in perioperative radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patient reported health related quality of life outcomes after viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue placement directly over spared neurovascular bundles after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bothersome LUTS-a retrospective cohort study. Correction: Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1