Associations between psychosocial factors and long-term opioid use among injured workers receiving early opioids

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of industrial medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1002/ajim.23666
Andrea Elmore MS, Deborah Fulton-Kehoe PhD, MPH, Anne Arewasikporn PhD, John R. Haight MPH, Gary M. Franklin MD, MPH
{"title":"Associations between psychosocial factors and long-term opioid use among injured workers receiving early opioids","authors":"Andrea Elmore MS,&nbsp;Deborah Fulton-Kehoe PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Anne Arewasikporn PhD,&nbsp;John R. Haight MPH,&nbsp;Gary M. Franklin MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Long-term opioid use is related to numerous harms and has uncertain efficacy for chronic, non-cancer pain. Identification of individuals at risk for long-term opioid use can help support treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to determine psychosocial factors associated with opioid use 6 months after a work-related injury.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective observational cohort study incorporating surveys and administrative data. Eligibility included a workers' compensation claim for an injury between June 2019 and September 2021, no opioid use within 3 months before injury, and opioid use within 6 weeks after injury. The outcome was self-reported opioid use at the 6-month follow-up survey (no use, use some days, or use most or every day). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to calculate relative risk ratios (RRRs) for associations between self-reported psychosocial factors and long-term opioid use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 1724 respondents, 301 (17.5%) reported taking long-term opioids on some days and 87 (5.0%) reported taking long-term opioids on most or every day. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical covariates, workers reporting work fear-avoidance had a higher relative risk of opioid use most or every day, versus no opioid use at the 6-month survey, compared to those without work fear-avoidance (RRR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.08, 3.50). Anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and recovery expectations were not associated with long-term opioid use after covariate adjustment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Work fear-avoidance was associated with long-term opioid use in this study of injured workers. Addressing fears surrounding an injury and returning to work may help deter reliance on long-term opioids.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Long-term opioid use is related to numerous harms and has uncertain efficacy for chronic, non-cancer pain. Identification of individuals at risk for long-term opioid use can help support treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to determine psychosocial factors associated with opioid use 6 months after a work-related injury.

Methods

This was a prospective observational cohort study incorporating surveys and administrative data. Eligibility included a workers' compensation claim for an injury between June 2019 and September 2021, no opioid use within 3 months before injury, and opioid use within 6 weeks after injury. The outcome was self-reported opioid use at the 6-month follow-up survey (no use, use some days, or use most or every day). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to calculate relative risk ratios (RRRs) for associations between self-reported psychosocial factors and long-term opioid use.

Results

Of the 1724 respondents, 301 (17.5%) reported taking long-term opioids on some days and 87 (5.0%) reported taking long-term opioids on most or every day. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical covariates, workers reporting work fear-avoidance had a higher relative risk of opioid use most or every day, versus no opioid use at the 6-month survey, compared to those without work fear-avoidance (RRR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.08, 3.50). Anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and recovery expectations were not associated with long-term opioid use after covariate adjustment.

Conclusions

Work fear-avoidance was associated with long-term opioid use in this study of injured workers. Addressing fears surrounding an injury and returning to work may help deter reliance on long-term opioids.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受早期阿片类药物治疗的受伤工人的社会心理因素与长期使用阿片类药物之间的关系。
背景:长期使用阿片类药物会带来许多危害,而且对慢性非癌症疼痛的疗效也不确定。识别长期使用阿片类药物的风险个体有助于支持治疗决策。本研究旨在确定与工伤 6 个月后使用阿片类药物相关的社会心理因素:这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,其中包括调查和管理数据。研究对象的资格包括:在 2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 9 月期间因工伤申请工伤赔偿,受伤前 3 个月内未使用过阿片类药物,以及受伤后 6 周内使用过阿片类药物。结果是在 6 个月的随访调查中自我报告的阿片类药物使用情况(未使用、偶尔使用、大部分或每天使用)。多项式逻辑回归模型用于计算自我报告的社会心理因素与长期使用阿片类药物之间的相对风险比(RRR):在 1724 名受访者中,有 301 人(17.5%)报告说有时会长期服用阿片类药物,有 87 人(5.0%)报告说大部分时间或每天都会长期服用阿片类药物。在对社会人口学和临床协变量进行调整后,与没有工作恐惧回避的受访者相比,报告工作恐惧回避的受访者在 6 个月的调查中每天或大部分时间服用阿片类药物的相对风险高于未服用阿片类药物的受访者(RRR = 1.95,95% CI = 1.08,3.50)。经过协变量调整后,焦虑症状、抑郁症状和康复预期与长期使用阿片类药物无关:结论:在这项针对受伤工人的研究中,工作恐惧回避与阿片类药物的长期使用有关。消除对受伤和重返工作岗位的恐惧可能有助于阻止对阿片类药物的长期依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
期刊最新文献
A longitudinal pre-post study: An evaluation of the Department of the Air Force bundled occupational fall prevention efforts. Issue Information Essential(ly forgotten) workers: Latine youth farmworkers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveillance of asbestos related disease among workers enrolled in an exposure registry. Prevalence of COVID-19 and Long COVID by industry and occupation: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1