Role of the Surgeon in De-Escalating Emotion During a Breast Cancer Surgery Consultation: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences in Alliance A231701CD.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16156-1
Megan C Saucke, Nora Jacobson, Grace McKinney, Heather B Neuman
{"title":"Role of the Surgeon in De-Escalating Emotion During a Breast Cancer Surgery Consultation: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences in Alliance A231701CD.","authors":"Megan C Saucke, Nora Jacobson, Grace McKinney, Heather B Neuman","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16156-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient engagement in decision making can improve satisfaction with care. Studies demonstrate that patients' emotional states can be significant barriers to engaging in shared decision making.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to examine how emotion associated with a breast cancer diagnosis impacts patient experiences during the surgical consultation, and explore opportunities for surgeons to mitigate the impact of emotion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with patients who participated in the decision aid arm of Alliance A231701CD, had low engagement, and experienced barriers to engagement. We used qualitative content analysis to analyze the interview data and organize it into overarching themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants recalled strong emotions with their diagnosis, describing it as devastating and shocking. Although several participants said that their emotional reaction to the diagnosis lessened over time, others expressed still feeling very anxious. Participants described ways in which their surgeon helped to de-escalate their emotional state, beginning with the establishment of rapport and continuing through treatment planning. Participants valued surgeons who they perceived to be personable and compassionate, treated them as an individual, provided reassuring and matter-of-fact information about their cancer, and efficiently communicated plans for next steps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with breast cancer are often emotionally overwhelmed during their surgical consults, which impedes their ability to listen and participate in decision making. However, surgeon behaviors can help de-escalate emotions. Addressing emotion is critical to support patients in reaching a decision for breast cancer surgery and is likely to improve patient satisfaction with the decision process.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03766009.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"8873-8881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16156-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement in decision making can improve satisfaction with care. Studies demonstrate that patients' emotional states can be significant barriers to engaging in shared decision making.

Objective: We sought to examine how emotion associated with a breast cancer diagnosis impacts patient experiences during the surgical consultation, and explore opportunities for surgeons to mitigate the impact of emotion.

Methods: We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with patients who participated in the decision aid arm of Alliance A231701CD, had low engagement, and experienced barriers to engagement. We used qualitative content analysis to analyze the interview data and organize it into overarching themes.

Results: Participants recalled strong emotions with their diagnosis, describing it as devastating and shocking. Although several participants said that their emotional reaction to the diagnosis lessened over time, others expressed still feeling very anxious. Participants described ways in which their surgeon helped to de-escalate their emotional state, beginning with the establishment of rapport and continuing through treatment planning. Participants valued surgeons who they perceived to be personable and compassionate, treated them as an individual, provided reassuring and matter-of-fact information about their cancer, and efficiently communicated plans for next steps.

Conclusions: Patients with breast cancer are often emotionally overwhelmed during their surgical consults, which impedes their ability to listen and participate in decision making. However, surgeon behaviors can help de-escalate emotions. Addressing emotion is critical to support patients in reaching a decision for breast cancer surgery and is likely to improve patient satisfaction with the decision process.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03766009.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科医生在乳腺癌手术咨询过程中消除情绪的作用:A231701CD 联盟中患者体验的定性研究。
背景:患者参与决策可提高护理满意度。研究表明,患者的情绪状态可能成为参与共同决策的重大障碍:我们试图研究与乳腺癌诊断相关的情绪如何影响患者在手术咨询过程中的体验,并探索外科医生减轻情绪影响的机会:我们对参与了联盟 A231701CD 决策辅助部分、参与度较低并遇到参与障碍的患者进行了 30 次半结构式访谈。我们采用定性内容分析法对访谈数据进行了分析,并将其整理成总体主题:参与者回忆起他们被诊断时的强烈情绪,将其描述为毁灭性的、令人震惊的。尽管几位参与者表示,随着时间的推移,他们对诊断结果的情绪反应有所缓解,但其他人表示仍然感到非常焦虑。参与者描述了他们的外科医生帮助他们缓和情绪的方式,从建立融洽的关系开始,一直到治疗计划。他们认为外科医生具有亲和力和同情心,将他们视为一个独立的个体,提供有关其癌症的令人放心和实事求是的信息,并有效地传达下一步计划:结论:乳腺癌患者在接受手术咨询时往往会情绪激动,这妨碍了他们倾听和参与决策的能力。然而,外科医生的行为有助于缓解情绪。解决情绪问题对于支持患者做出乳腺癌手术决定至关重要,并有可能提高患者对决策过程的满意度:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03766009。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The Top Ten Annals of Surgical Oncology Original Articles on Twitter/X: 2020-2023. Correction: ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgery, Three-Dimensional (3D) Reconstruction and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: The Perfect Combo to Enter the Era of Intraoperative Liver Navigation. Correction: Patient-Reported Outcomes 10 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. ASO Visual Abstract: Evaluating the Efficacy of Different Treatment Intensities in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Nationwide Cancer Registry-Based Study. ASO Visual Abstract: Cost-Analysis of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1