Evaluation of a radiological grading system for the early detection of total knee arthroplasties at risk for revision surgery.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05572-3
Nina Hörlesberger, Maria Anna Smolle, Lukas Leitner, Viktor Labmayr, Andreas Leithner, Patrick Sadoghi
{"title":"Evaluation of a radiological grading system for the early detection of total knee arthroplasties at risk for revision surgery.","authors":"Nina Hörlesberger, Maria Anna Smolle, Lukas Leitner, Viktor Labmayr, Andreas Leithner, Patrick Sadoghi","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05572-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>X-rays are regularly performed after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While soft tissue management and ligament tension cannot be evaluated, important information, such as inadequate component positioning and loose cement location, as well as subsequent loosening, can be detected. The aim of this study was to correlate radiological findings, referring to the radiological grading system (previously published by the same study group, henceforth abbreviated as \"RGS\"), with long-term outcomes and implant survival.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 266 patients who underwent titanium-coated TKA were included. In addition to implant survival, visual analogue scale score, Tegner activity score, knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and short form-12 score as well as range of motion were evaluated. Clinical examination as well as anterior-posterior, lateral, full-length weight bearing, and patellar view radiographs were performed pre- and postoperatively, at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-ups and at the final follow-up. The radiological grading system was evaluated and correlated with long-term outcome and survivorship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The revision-free survival rate was 88.4% at a median follow-up of 9.8 years (IQR: 9.3-10.3 years; range: 0.1-11.8 years). Revision surgery was required in 31 TKAs (11.7%). The multivariate Cox regression model showed a significant association between an RGS score ≥ 3 deviation points (DP) and an increased risk for revision (hazard ratio: 2.092; 95% CI: 1.020-4.290; p = 0.044). Moreover, the KSS for pain was significantly worse in patients with a RGS score ≥ 3 DP (median, 85 [74-92] vs. 90 [80-94]; p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study indicating that deviation in component positioning, having an inadequate long leg axis, the presence of free cement or residual bony structures on postoperative X-rays significantly correlate with TKA outcome and implant survival. Therefore RGS can be of high predicable value for the survivorship of the prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV - retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"4857-4863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05572-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: X-rays are regularly performed after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While soft tissue management and ligament tension cannot be evaluated, important information, such as inadequate component positioning and loose cement location, as well as subsequent loosening, can be detected. The aim of this study was to correlate radiological findings, referring to the radiological grading system (previously published by the same study group, henceforth abbreviated as "RGS"), with long-term outcomes and implant survival.

Materials and methods: A total of 266 patients who underwent titanium-coated TKA were included. In addition to implant survival, visual analogue scale score, Tegner activity score, knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and short form-12 score as well as range of motion were evaluated. Clinical examination as well as anterior-posterior, lateral, full-length weight bearing, and patellar view radiographs were performed pre- and postoperatively, at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-ups and at the final follow-up. The radiological grading system was evaluated and correlated with long-term outcome and survivorship.

Results: The revision-free survival rate was 88.4% at a median follow-up of 9.8 years (IQR: 9.3-10.3 years; range: 0.1-11.8 years). Revision surgery was required in 31 TKAs (11.7%). The multivariate Cox regression model showed a significant association between an RGS score ≥ 3 deviation points (DP) and an increased risk for revision (hazard ratio: 2.092; 95% CI: 1.020-4.290; p = 0.044). Moreover, the KSS for pain was significantly worse in patients with a RGS score ≥ 3 DP (median, 85 [74-92] vs. 90 [80-94]; p = 0.007).

Conclusions: This is the first study indicating that deviation in component positioning, having an inadequate long leg axis, the presence of free cement or residual bony structures on postoperative X-rays significantly correlate with TKA outcome and implant survival. Therefore RGS can be of high predicable value for the survivorship of the prosthesis.

Level of evidence: Level IV - retrospective cohort study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于早期发现有翻修手术风险的全膝关节置换术的放射学分级系统。
简介:初级全膝关节置换术(TKA)后定期进行 X 光检查。虽然不能对软组织管理和韧带张力进行评估,但可以发现一些重要信息,如组件定位不当、松动的骨水泥位置以及随后的松动。本研究的目的是参照放射学分级系统(由同一研究小组先前发表,以下简称 "RGS"),将放射学结果与长期疗效和植入物存活率联系起来:共纳入了 266 例接受钛涂层 TKA 的患者。除假体存活率外,还评估了视觉模拟量表评分、Tegner 活动评分、膝关节社会评分(KSS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数、短表格-12 评分以及活动范围。在术前、术后、术后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的随访以及最终随访时,均进行了临床检查以及前后、侧位、全长负重和髌骨视图X光片检查。对放射学分级系统进行了评估,并将其与长期疗效和存活率相关联:中位随访 9.8 年(IQR:9.3-10.3 年;范围:0.1-11.8 年),无翻修生存率为 88.4%。需要进行翻修手术的 TKAs 有 31 例(11.7%)。多变量 Cox 回归模型显示,RGS 评分≥ 3 个偏差点 (DP) 与翻修风险增加之间存在显著关联(危险比:2.092;95% CI:1.020-4.290;P = 0.044)。此外,RGS评分≥3个DP的患者疼痛的KSS值明显更差(中位数,85 [74-92] vs. 90 [80-94]; p = 0.007):这是第一项研究表明,组件定位偏差、长腿轴线不足、术后 X 光片上存在游离骨水泥或残留骨结构与 TKA 结果和植入物存活率有显著相关性。因此,RGS 对假体的存活率具有很高的预测价值:证据等级:IV 级--回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Epiphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between trabecular metal and titanium augments. Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: a systematic review and Delphi consensus from the European Knee Society. Correction potential and outcome of various surgical procedures for hallux valgus surgery: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient-reported outcome measures in studies on hallux valgus surgery: what should be assessed. Periprocedural clinical outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty: a multi-centric comparison of current strategies based on the NSQIP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1