Orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic and acetabular fractures

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05566-1
Alexander Martin Keppler, Markus Gosch, Christian Kammerlander
{"title":"Orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic and acetabular fractures","authors":"Alexander Martin Keppler,&nbsp;Markus Gosch,&nbsp;Christian Kammerlander","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05566-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osteoporosis, age and frailty significantly impacts outcomes in fragility fractures of the pelvis, increasing morbidity and mortality. Identifying frailty aids in risk stratification and personalized care plans, enhancing recovery and reducing complications in older adults. Orthogeriatric co-management, an interdisciplinary approach combining orthopedics and geriatrics, optimizes care for older adults with fragility fractures. This model improves outcomes through integrated preoperative and postoperative care. This study examines the current literature for orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic ring or acetabular fractures, aiming to improve outcomes for older adults.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Orthogeriatric co-management can be an effective tool to significantly enhances clinical care and reduces complications in older adults with pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. Studies demonstrate increased detection of urological complications and earlier patient mobilisation, alongside a notable decrease in revision surgery rates. The implementation of a specialized framework underscores the necessity for standardised orthogeriatric protocols, optimizing patient outcomes and satisfaction. Integrating geriatric expertise in surgical treatment addresses comorbidities more effectively and minimizes postoperative complications. The certification of such centers ensures adherence to quality standards, fostering continuous improvement in care. Standardised orthogeriatric management should extend to all older fracture patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"144 10","pages":"4595 - 4599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05566-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis, age and frailty significantly impacts outcomes in fragility fractures of the pelvis, increasing morbidity and mortality. Identifying frailty aids in risk stratification and personalized care plans, enhancing recovery and reducing complications in older adults. Orthogeriatric co-management, an interdisciplinary approach combining orthopedics and geriatrics, optimizes care for older adults with fragility fractures. This model improves outcomes through integrated preoperative and postoperative care. This study examines the current literature for orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic ring or acetabular fractures, aiming to improve outcomes for older adults.

Conclusion

Orthogeriatric co-management can be an effective tool to significantly enhances clinical care and reduces complications in older adults with pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. Studies demonstrate increased detection of urological complications and earlier patient mobilisation, alongside a notable decrease in revision surgery rates. The implementation of a specialized framework underscores the necessity for standardised orthogeriatric protocols, optimizing patient outcomes and satisfaction. Integrating geriatric expertise in surgical treatment addresses comorbidities more effectively and minimizes postoperative complications. The certification of such centers ensures adherence to quality standards, fostering continuous improvement in care. Standardised orthogeriatric management should extend to all older fracture patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨盆和髋臼骨折的老年骨科共同管理。
背景:骨质疏松症、年龄和体弱会严重影响骨盆脆性骨折的治疗效果,增加发病率和死亡率。识别虚弱程度有助于进行风险分层和制定个性化护理计划,促进老年人的康复并减少并发症。骨科与老年病学联合管理是一种结合骨科与老年病学的跨学科方法,可优化对脆性骨折老年人的护理。这种模式通过整合术前和术后护理来提高治疗效果。本研究对骨盆环或髋臼骨折的老年骨科共同管理的现有文献进行了研究,旨在改善老年人的治疗效果:结论:对于骨盆环和髋臼骨折的老年人来说,老年骨科共同管理是一种有效的工具,可显著提高临床护理水平并减少并发症。研究表明,泌尿系统并发症的检出率有所提高,患者的活动能力也有所增强,同时翻修手术率也明显下降。专业框架的实施强调了标准化老年骨科治疗方案的必要性,从而优化了患者的治疗效果和满意度。在手术治疗中融入老年医学专业知识,能更有效地解决合并症问题,并最大限度地减少术后并发症。此类中心的认证可确保遵守质量标准,促进护理工作的持续改进。标准化的老年骨科管理应扩展至所有老年骨折患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Epiphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between trabecular metal and titanium augments. Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: a systematic review and Delphi consensus from the European Knee Society. Correction potential and outcome of various surgical procedures for hallux valgus surgery: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient-reported outcome measures in studies on hallux valgus surgery: what should be assessed. Periprocedural clinical outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty: a multi-centric comparison of current strategies based on the NSQIP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1