Cutting edge confusion about cut-off settings in autoimmune diagnostics

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Autoimmunity reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103650
Jan Damoiseaux , Hetty Bontkes , Leontine Mulder
{"title":"Cutting edge confusion about cut-off settings in autoimmune diagnostics","authors":"Jan Damoiseaux ,&nbsp;Hetty Bontkes ,&nbsp;Leontine Mulder","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In autoimmune diagnostics results are interpreted in relation to a single or multiple cut-off value(s) in order to decide if the test is negative, weak positive, positive, or even strong positive. The way a cut-off is established appears to be very heterogeneous and this hampers harmonization of test results obtained in assays, either established in-house or obtained from different companies. In this context it is surprising that in diagnostic and classification criteria for distinct autoimmune diseases referral is made to cut-off values with the intention of harmonization. In this review article distinct ways to establish cut-off values will be described and discussed in relation to some disease criteria in order to increase the awareness of the confusion matrix of cut-off values and, as a consequence, the implications for test result interpretation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 11","pages":"Article 103650"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224001411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In autoimmune diagnostics results are interpreted in relation to a single or multiple cut-off value(s) in order to decide if the test is negative, weak positive, positive, or even strong positive. The way a cut-off is established appears to be very heterogeneous and this hampers harmonization of test results obtained in assays, either established in-house or obtained from different companies. In this context it is surprising that in diagnostic and classification criteria for distinct autoimmune diseases referral is made to cut-off values with the intention of harmonization. In this review article distinct ways to establish cut-off values will be described and discussed in relation to some disease criteria in order to increase the awareness of the confusion matrix of cut-off values and, as a consequence, the implications for test result interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于自身免疫诊断中截止值设置的前沿困惑。
在自身免疫诊断中,检测结果是根据一个或多个临界值来解释的,以确定检测结果是阴性、弱阳性、阳性,甚至是强阳性。确定临界值的方法似乎很不统一,这就妨碍了内部建立或从不同公司获得的检测结果的统一。在这种情况下,令人惊讶的是,在不同自身免疫性疾病的诊断和分类标准中,都会参考临界值,以求统一。在这篇综述文章中,我们将结合一些疾病的标准,描述和讨论确定临界值的不同方法,以提高人们对临界值混淆矩阵的认识,从而了解临界值对检测结果判读的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Autoimmunity reviews
Autoimmunity reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
24.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
164
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers. The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences. In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations. Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Anti-lipoprotein lipase antibodies: A review. MOGAD: A comprehensive review of clinicoradiological features, therapy and outcomes in 4699 patients globally. Advancing understanding of autoimmune disease-related interstitial lung disease (AD-ILD): A global perspective on research focus and future directions. Is it time for treat-to-target in antiphospholipid syndrome? Artificial intelligence meets the world experts; updates and novel therapies in autoimmunity - The 14th international congress on autoimmunity 2024 (AUTO14), Ljubljana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1