Validating the splicing effect of rare variants in the SLC26A4 gene using minigene assay.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY BMC Medical Genomics Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s12920-024-02007-1
Yixin Zhao, Yan Long, Tao Shi, Xin Ma, Chengyu Lian, Hanjun Wang, Hongen Xu, Lisheng Yu, Xiaotao Zhao
{"title":"Validating the splicing effect of rare variants in the SLC26A4 gene using minigene assay.","authors":"Yixin Zhao, Yan Long, Tao Shi, Xin Ma, Chengyu Lian, Hanjun Wang, Hongen Xu, Lisheng Yu, Xiaotao Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s12920-024-02007-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SLC26A4 gene is the second most common cause of hereditary hearing loss in human. The aim of this study was to utilize the minigene assay in order to identify pathogenic variants of SLC26A4 associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and hearing loss (HL) in two patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients were subjected to multiplex PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing of common deafness genes (including GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1), then bioinformatics analysis was performed on the sequencing data to identify candidate pathogenic variants. Minigene experiments were conducted to determine the potential impact of the variants on splicing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic testing revealed that the first patient carried compound heterozygous variants c.[1149 + 1G > A]; [919-2 A > G] in the SLC26A4 gene, while the second patient carried compound heterozygous variants c.[2089 + 3 A > T]; [919-2 A > G] in the same gene. Minigene experiments demonstrated that both c.1149 + 1G > A and c.2089 + 3 A > T affected mRNA splicing. According to the ACMG guidelines and the recommendations of the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for ACMG variant interpretation, these variants were classified as \"likely pathogenic\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified the molecular etiology of hearing loss in two patients with EVA and elucidated the impact of rare variants on splicing, thus contributing to the mutational spectrum of pathogenic variants in the SLC26A4 gene.</p>","PeriodicalId":8915,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-024-02007-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The SLC26A4 gene is the second most common cause of hereditary hearing loss in human. The aim of this study was to utilize the minigene assay in order to identify pathogenic variants of SLC26A4 associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and hearing loss (HL) in two patients.

Methods: The patients were subjected to multiplex PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing of common deafness genes (including GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1), then bioinformatics analysis was performed on the sequencing data to identify candidate pathogenic variants. Minigene experiments were conducted to determine the potential impact of the variants on splicing.

Results: Genetic testing revealed that the first patient carried compound heterozygous variants c.[1149 + 1G > A]; [919-2 A > G] in the SLC26A4 gene, while the second patient carried compound heterozygous variants c.[2089 + 3 A > T]; [919-2 A > G] in the same gene. Minigene experiments demonstrated that both c.1149 + 1G > A and c.2089 + 3 A > T affected mRNA splicing. According to the ACMG guidelines and the recommendations of the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for ACMG variant interpretation, these variants were classified as "likely pathogenic".

Conclusions: This study identified the molecular etiology of hearing loss in two patients with EVA and elucidated the impact of rare variants on splicing, thus contributing to the mutational spectrum of pathogenic variants in the SLC26A4 gene.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用微型基因检测验证 SLC26A4 基因罕见变体的剪接效应
背景:SLC26A4基因是导致人类遗传性听力损失的第二大常见原因。本研究的目的是利用微型基因检测法,在两名患者中鉴定与前庭导水管扩大(EVA)和听力损失(HL)相关的 SLC26A4 致病变体:对患者进行常见耳聋基因(包括GJB2、SLC26A4和MT-RNR1)的多重PCR扩增和新一代测序,然后对测序数据进行生物信息学分析,以确定候选致病变体。然后对测序数据进行生物信息学分析,找出候选致病变异体,并进行微型基因实验,以确定这些变异体对剪接的潜在影响:基因检测结果显示,第一位患者携带 SLC26A4 基因中的复合杂合变异 c.[1149 + 1G > A]; [919-2 A > G],而第二位患者携带同一基因中的复合杂合变异 c.[2089 + 3 A > T]; [919-2 A > G]。微型基因实验表明,c.1149 + 1G > A 和 c.2089 + 3 A > T 都会影响 mRNA 的剪接。根据ACMG指南和ClinGen听力损失专家组对ACMG变异解释的建议,这些变异被归类为 "可能致病":本研究确定了两名 EVA 患者听力损失的分子病因,阐明了罕见变异对剪接的影响,从而为 SLC26A4 基因致病变异的突变谱做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Genomics
BMC Medical Genomics 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
243
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Genomics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of functional genomics, genome structure, genome-scale population genetics, epigenomics, proteomics, systems analysis, and pharmacogenomics in relation to human health and disease.
期刊最新文献
The signature of SARS-CoV-2-related genes predicts the immune therapeutic response and prognosis in breast cancer. Association between venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation: a Mendelian randomization study. New insight into the development of synpolydactyly caused by expansion of HOXD13 polyalanine based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis. RNA-seq validation of microRNA expression signatures for precision melanoma diagnosis and prognostic stratification. The Toll-like receptor 4 antagonist TAK-242 in combination with sodium hyaluronate alleviates postoperative abdominal adhesion in a mouse model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1