Mood regulation in euthymic patients with a history of antidepressant-induced mania.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Bipolar Disorders Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1111/bdi.13504
Ramzi Halabi, Khairatun Yusuff, Clara Park, Alexandra DeShaw, Christina Gonzalez-Torres, Muhammad I Husain, Claire O'Donovan, Martin Alda, Benoit H Mulsant, Abigail Ortiz
{"title":"Mood regulation in euthymic patients with a history of antidepressant-induced mania.","authors":"Ramzi Halabi, Khairatun Yusuff, Clara Park, Alexandra DeShaw, Christina Gonzalez-Torres, Muhammad I Husain, Claire O'Donovan, Martin Alda, Benoit H Mulsant, Abigail Ortiz","doi":"10.1111/bdi.13504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder (BD) remains contentious, in part due to the risk of antidepressant-induced mania (AIM). However, there is no information on the architecture of mood regulation in patients who have experienced AIM. We compared the architecture of mood regulation in euthymic patients with and without a history of AIM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-four euthymic participants were included. Participants rated their mood, anxiety and energy levels daily using an electronic (e-) visual analog scale, for a mean (SD) of 280.8(151.4) days. We analyzed their multivariate time series by computing each variable's auto-correlation, inter-variable cross-correlation, and composite multiscale entropy of mood, anxiety, and energy. Then, we compared the data features of participants with a history of AIM and those without AIM, using analysis of covariance, controlling for age, sex, and current treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 18,103 daily observations, participants with AIM showed significantly stronger day-to-day auto-correlation and cross-correlation for mood, anxiety, and energy than those without AIM. The highest cross-correlation in participants with AIM was between mood and energy within the same day (median (IQR), 0.58 (0.27)). The strongest negative cross-correlation in participants with AIM was between mood and anxiety series within the same day (median (IQR), -0.52 (0.34)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a history of AIM have a different underlying mood architecture compared to those without AIM. Their mood, anxiety and energy stay the same from day-to-day; and their anxiety is negatively correlated with their mood.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder (BD) remains contentious, in part due to the risk of antidepressant-induced mania (AIM). However, there is no information on the architecture of mood regulation in patients who have experienced AIM. We compared the architecture of mood regulation in euthymic patients with and without a history of AIM.

Methods: Eighty-four euthymic participants were included. Participants rated their mood, anxiety and energy levels daily using an electronic (e-) visual analog scale, for a mean (SD) of 280.8(151.4) days. We analyzed their multivariate time series by computing each variable's auto-correlation, inter-variable cross-correlation, and composite multiscale entropy of mood, anxiety, and energy. Then, we compared the data features of participants with a history of AIM and those without AIM, using analysis of covariance, controlling for age, sex, and current treatment.

Results: Based on 18,103 daily observations, participants with AIM showed significantly stronger day-to-day auto-correlation and cross-correlation for mood, anxiety, and energy than those without AIM. The highest cross-correlation in participants with AIM was between mood and energy within the same day (median (IQR), 0.58 (0.27)). The strongest negative cross-correlation in participants with AIM was between mood and anxiety series within the same day (median (IQR), -0.52 (0.34)).

Conclusion: Patients with a history of AIM have a different underlying mood architecture compared to those without AIM. Their mood, anxiety and energy stay the same from day-to-day; and their anxiety is negatively correlated with their mood.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有抗抑郁剂诱发躁狂症病史的嗜睡患者的情绪调节。
导言:双相情感障碍(BD)患者使用抗抑郁药仍存在争议,部分原因是抗抑郁药诱发躁狂(AIM)的风险。然而,目前还没有关于经历过 AIM 的患者的情绪调节结构的信息。我们比较了有过和没有过 AIM 病史的嗜睡症患者的情绪调节结构:方法:我们纳入了 84 名情绪亢奋的参与者。参与者每天使用电子(e-)视觉模拟量表评定自己的情绪、焦虑和能量水平,平均(标清)评定时间为 280.8(151.4)天。我们通过计算每个变量的自相关性、变量间的交叉相关性以及情绪、焦虑和精力的复合多尺度熵,对他们的多变量时间序列进行了分析。然后,我们使用协方差分析法比较了有 AIM 病史和无 AIM 病史的参与者的数据特征,并对年龄、性别和当前治疗进行了控制:结果:根据 18103 次日常观察,有 AIM 的参与者在情绪、焦虑和能量方面的日常自相关性和交叉相关性明显强于无 AIM 的参与者。在有 AIM 的参与者中,同一天内情绪和能量之间的交叉相关性最高(中位数(IQR),0.58 (0.27))。在 AIM 患者中,同一天内情绪与焦虑系列之间的负相关性最强(中位数(IQR),-0.52 (0.34)):结论:与无 AIM 患者相比,有 AIM 病史的患者具有不同的潜在情绪结构。结论:与无 AIM 患者相比,有 AIM 病史的患者有不同的潜在情绪结构,他们的情绪、焦虑和精力每天都保持不变,焦虑与情绪呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Early use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in bipolar disorder type I: An expert consensus. Psychotherapy online: Bridging the gap between recommendations and reality Commentary on ‘Comorbidity of bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder: Phenomenology, course and treatment considerations’ by Temes et al. The Holy Grail revisited: What works for whom?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1