Attrition, adherence, and compliance to exercise training interventions in persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of training studies.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-01-02 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2403632
Carly L A Wender, Elijah Farrar, Brian M Sandroff
{"title":"Attrition, adherence, and compliance to exercise training interventions in persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of training studies.","authors":"Carly L A Wender, Elijah Farrar, Brian M Sandroff","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2403632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise training (ET) is a promising rehabilitation approach for long-term negative consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known regarding overall rates of attrition, adherence, and compliance to ET in TBI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to estimate average attrition, adherence, and compliance rates in ET studies in persons with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched from inception to April 15, 2024. Two authors independently extracted data related to attrition, adherence, compliance, and possible moderators identified <i>a priori</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average rate of attrition from 45 studies was 14.4%, although the majority of studies had small sample sizes (i.e. <i>n</i> < 42). Based on hierarchical linear regression, the most influential predictors of attrition were sample size and study design. A minority of studies reported adherence (44.4%) or compliance (22.2%) but those that did reported good average adherence (85.1%) and compliance (77.7%). These studies support the ability of persons with TBI to complete an ET intervention as prescribed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Researchers can use this information to ensure adequate power to detect a true effect of ET in persons with TBI. Researchers conducting ET studies in persons with TBI should clearly and thoroughly report data on attrition, adherence, and compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"70-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2403632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise training (ET) is a promising rehabilitation approach for long-term negative consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known regarding overall rates of attrition, adherence, and compliance to ET in TBI.

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to estimate average attrition, adherence, and compliance rates in ET studies in persons with TBI.

Methods: Databases were searched from inception to April 15, 2024. Two authors independently extracted data related to attrition, adherence, compliance, and possible moderators identified a priori.

Results: The average rate of attrition from 45 studies was 14.4%, although the majority of studies had small sample sizes (i.e. n < 42). Based on hierarchical linear regression, the most influential predictors of attrition were sample size and study design. A minority of studies reported adherence (44.4%) or compliance (22.2%) but those that did reported good average adherence (85.1%) and compliance (77.7%). These studies support the ability of persons with TBI to complete an ET intervention as prescribed.

Conclusions: Researchers can use this information to ensure adequate power to detect a true effect of ET in persons with TBI. Researchers conducting ET studies in persons with TBI should clearly and thoroughly report data on attrition, adherence, and compliance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑外伤患者运动训练干预的流失、坚持和依从性:训练研究的系统性回顾。
背景:运动训练(ET)是治疗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)长期不良后果的一种很有前景的康复方法。然而,人们对创伤性脑损伤患者运动训练的总体减员率、坚持率和达标率知之甚少:本系统性综述旨在估算针对 TBI 患者的 ET 研究的平均减员率、坚持率和依从率:方法:检索了从开始到 2024 年 4 月 15 日的数据库。两位作者分别独立提取了与自然减员、依从性、依从性以及先验确定的可能调节因素相关的数据:结果:45 项研究的平均流失率为 14.4%,尽管大多数研究的样本量较小(即 n 个结论):研究人员可以利用这些信息来确保有足够的力量来检测 ET 对创伤性脑损伤患者的真正影响。对创伤性脑损伤患者进行 ET 研究的研究人员应清楚、详尽地报告有关减员、依从性和顺应性的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Medical complications and advance medical decision-making in the minimally conscious state. Responding to the ongoing pandemic-related challenges of individuals with brain injury through the perspective of community-service in Canada: A qualitative study. Understanding 'quality' in adult traumatic brain injury rehabilitation from the perspectives of different stakeholders: a participatory mixed methods study. Understanding factors influencing exercise program adherence for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). Dodecafluoropentane improves neuro-behavioral outcomes and return of spontaneous circulation rate in a swine model of cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1