Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for brain arteriovenous malformations: a single-institute experience.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03876-w
Zhao-Ying Zhu, Wei Zhang, Shi-Hong Zhu, Gui-Jun Zhang, Jing Chen
{"title":"Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for brain arteriovenous malformations: a single-institute experience.","authors":"Zhao-Ying Zhu, Wei Zhang, Shi-Hong Zhu, Gui-Jun Zhang, Jing Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03876-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) represent an ongoing clinical challenge because of their complex nature. The long-term outcomes of BAVMs patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 201 patients treated for BAVMs from January 2010 to December 2019. The identified predictors of obliteration or hemorrhage in the multivariate analysis were estimated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) alone as the primary treatment for BAVMs were included. The mean age at GKRS treatment was 31.4 ± 1.1 years, and 61.2% of the patients were male. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that a higher radiosurgery-based AVM score (OR 1.847, 95% CI = 1.292-2.641; p = 0.001) was significantly associated with worse obliteration, and a higher margin dose significantly favored obliteration (OR 0.352, 95% CI = 0.189-0.658; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increased lesion volume of 1 cm<sup>3</sup> (OR 1.279, 95% CI = 1.023-1.600; p = 0.031) and a high margin dose (OR 0.363, 95% CI = 0.134-0.983; p = 0.046) were significant prognostic factors for post-SRS hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, our study investigated the available clinical and radiological prognostic factors for BAVMs and revealed that a higher margin dose significantly improved both the obliteration rate and nonhemorrhagic outcomes. Currently, the most appropriate candidates, Spetzler-Martin grade, and optimal radiation dose are still being defined by prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"24 1","pages":"368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03876-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) represent an ongoing clinical challenge because of their complex nature. The long-term outcomes of BAVMs patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone are unclear.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 201 patients treated for BAVMs from January 2010 to December 2019. The identified predictors of obliteration or hemorrhage in the multivariate analysis were estimated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: A total of 201 patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) alone as the primary treatment for BAVMs were included. The mean age at GKRS treatment was 31.4 ± 1.1 years, and 61.2% of the patients were male. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that a higher radiosurgery-based AVM score (OR 1.847, 95% CI = 1.292-2.641; p = 0.001) was significantly associated with worse obliteration, and a higher margin dose significantly favored obliteration (OR 0.352, 95% CI = 0.189-0.658; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increased lesion volume of 1 cm3 (OR 1.279, 95% CI = 1.023-1.600; p = 0.031) and a high margin dose (OR 0.363, 95% CI = 0.134-0.983; p = 0.046) were significant prognostic factors for post-SRS hemorrhage.

Conclusions: In conclusion, our study investigated the available clinical and radiological prognostic factors for BAVMs and revealed that a higher margin dose significantly improved both the obliteration rate and nonhemorrhagic outcomes. Currently, the most appropriate candidates, Spetzler-Martin grade, and optimal radiation dose are still being defined by prospective trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单纯立体定向放射外科治疗脑动静脉畸形:一家研究所的经验。
目的:脑动静脉畸形(BAVM)因其复杂的性质而一直是临床难题。仅接受立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)治疗的脑动静脉畸形患者的长期疗效尚不明确:我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受治疗的 201 例 BAVM 患者进行了回顾性分析。在多变量分析中确定的血流阻塞或出血的预测因素通过几率比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)进行估算:结果:共纳入了201例以伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)为主要治疗手段的BAVM患者。接受伽玛刀放射外科治疗时的平均年龄为(31.4 ± 1.1)岁,61.2%的患者为男性。多变量逻辑回归显示,基于放射外科的 AVM 评分越高(OR 1.847,95% CI = 1.292-2.641;P = 0.001),其阻塞情况越差;边缘剂量越高,阻塞情况越好(OR 0.352,95% CI = 0.189-0.658;P = 0.001)。多变量分析显示,病灶体积增加到1立方厘米(OR 1.279,95% CI = 1.023-1.600;P = 0.031)和边缘剂量高(OR 0.363,95% CI = 0.134-0.983;P = 0.046)是SRS术后出血的重要预后因素:总之,我们的研究调查了现有的 BAVM 临床和放射学预后因素,结果显示较高的边缘剂量可显著提高血流阻断率和非出血预后。目前,最合适的人选、Spetzler-Martin分级和最佳放射剂量仍在前瞻性试验中确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Safety of alteplase intravenous thrombolysis and influencing factors of clinical outcome in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke. Amyloid myopathy mimicked with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy diagnosed using Congo red staining: a case report. Development and validation of the Out-of-Hospital Adherence Questionnaire for Stroke Patients (OHAQ-SP). Nitrous oxide abuse and associated neurological diseases. Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a pattern of care analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1