The neural signature of an erroneous thought.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Cerebral cortex Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhae390
Klara Steinhauser, Robert Steinhauser, Benjamin Ernst, Martin E Maier, Marco Steinhauser
{"title":"The neural signature of an erroneous thought.","authors":"Klara Steinhauser, Robert Steinhauser, Benjamin Ernst, Martin E Maier, Marco Steinhauser","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhae390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The human brain detects errors in overt behavior fast and efficiently. However, little is known about how errors are monitored that emerge on a mental level. We investigate whether neural correlates of error monitoring can be found during inner speech and whether the involved neural processes differ between these non-motor responses and behavioral motor responses. Therefore, electroencephalographic data were collected while participants performed two versions of a decision task that only differed between these response modalities. Erroneous responses were identified based on participants' metacognitive judgments. Correlates of error monitoring in event-related potentials were analyzed by applying residue iteration decomposition on stimulus-locked activity. Non-motor responses elicited the same cascade of early error-related negativity and late error positivity as motor responses. An analysis of oscillatory brain activity showed a similar theta response for both error types. A multivariate pattern classifier trained on theta from the motor condition could decode theta from the non-motor condition, demonstrating the similarity of both neural responses. These results show that errors in inner speech are monitored and detected utilizing the same neural processes as behavioral errors, suggesting that goal-directed cognition and behavior are supported by a generic error-monitoring system.</p>","PeriodicalId":9715,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex","volume":"34 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The human brain detects errors in overt behavior fast and efficiently. However, little is known about how errors are monitored that emerge on a mental level. We investigate whether neural correlates of error monitoring can be found during inner speech and whether the involved neural processes differ between these non-motor responses and behavioral motor responses. Therefore, electroencephalographic data were collected while participants performed two versions of a decision task that only differed between these response modalities. Erroneous responses were identified based on participants' metacognitive judgments. Correlates of error monitoring in event-related potentials were analyzed by applying residue iteration decomposition on stimulus-locked activity. Non-motor responses elicited the same cascade of early error-related negativity and late error positivity as motor responses. An analysis of oscillatory brain activity showed a similar theta response for both error types. A multivariate pattern classifier trained on theta from the motor condition could decode theta from the non-motor condition, demonstrating the similarity of both neural responses. These results show that errors in inner speech are monitored and detected utilizing the same neural processes as behavioral errors, suggesting that goal-directed cognition and behavior are supported by a generic error-monitoring system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
错误思维的神经特征。
人脑能快速有效地检测出明显行为中的错误。然而,人们对如何监测心理层面出现的错误却知之甚少。我们研究了在内心言语过程中是否能发现错误监测的神经相关性,以及这些非运动反应和行为运动反应所涉及的神经过程是否有所不同。因此,我们在参与者执行两个版本的决策任务时收集了脑电图数据,而这两个版本的决策任务仅在这些反应模式之间存在差异。根据参与者的元认知判断来识别错误的反应。通过对刺激锁定活动进行残差迭代分解,分析了事件相关电位中错误监测的相关因素。非运动反应引起了与运动反应相同的早期错误相关负性和晚期错误正性级联。对大脑振荡活动的分析表明,两种错误类型都有类似的θ反应。根据运动状态的θ训练的多元模式分类器可以解码非运动状态的θ,这证明了两种神经反应的相似性。这些结果表明,内心言语中的错误与行为错误一样,都是利用相同的神经过程进行监测和检测的,这表明目标导向的认知和行为是由一个通用的错误监测系统支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
510
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cerebral Cortex publishes papers on the development, organization, plasticity, and function of the cerebral cortex, including the hippocampus. Studies with clear relevance to the cerebral cortex, such as the thalamocortical relationship or cortico-subcortical interactions, are also included. The journal is multidisciplinary and covers the large variety of modern neurobiological and neuropsychological techniques, including anatomy, biochemistry, molecular neurobiology, electrophysiology, behavior, artificial intelligence, and theoretical modeling. In addition to research articles, special features such as brief reviews, book reviews, and commentaries are included.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in functional connectivity during suppression of imagined threat. When emotion and time meet from human and rodent perspectives: a central role for the amygdala? Introspective psychophysics for the study of subjective experience. Examining threat responses through a developmental lens. Causal relationship between cortical structural changes and onset of anxiety disorder: evidence from Mendelian randomization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1