Integrating Patients Into Programmes to Address the Allergy Knowledge Practice Gap

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Clinical and Experimental Allergy Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1111/cea.14563
John O. Warner, Sophie Jacoba Irma Maria Spitters
{"title":"Integrating Patients Into Programmes to Address the Allergy Knowledge Practice Gap","authors":"John O. Warner,&nbsp;Sophie Jacoba Irma Maria Spitters","doi":"10.1111/cea.14563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a wide gap between the first publication of new treatments with efficacy and their successful application in clinical practice. In many respects, the management of allergic diseases is a good exemplar of the knowledge/practice gap. It was assumed that systematic reviews and publication of guidelines would ensure timely delivery of effective care, but this has not proved to be the case. While there are many reasons to explain shortcomings in healthcare delivery, the lack of patient and carer involvement in the planning of research, evidence review, guideline development and guideline implementation is most compelling. To achieve adherence to evidence-based guidelines consistently across all levels of the health service requires the implementation of integrated care with clear pathways through which patients can navigate. Quality improvement methodology could be employed to plan and implement integrated care pathways (ICPs). There is evidence that ICPs achieve improved outcomes for acute hospital-based interventions, but less work has focussed on long-term conditions where more diverse agencies are involved. At all stages, stakeholder representation from the full range of healthcare professionals, patients, their families, social services, education, local government and employers must be involved. In this article we review the step-wise and iterative process by which knowledge is implemented into practice to improve patient experience and outcomes We argue how this process can benefit from the involvement of patients and their carers as equal partners, and we discuss how different initiatives have involved patients with allergic diseases. There currently is a gap in evidence that links patient involvement to improved outcomes. We recommend the use of the Core Outcome Sets (COS) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) which have been developed for allergic diseases to monitor the effects of implementation research and the impact of patient and carer involvement on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":"54 10","pages":"723-733"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cea.14563","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.14563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a wide gap between the first publication of new treatments with efficacy and their successful application in clinical practice. In many respects, the management of allergic diseases is a good exemplar of the knowledge/practice gap. It was assumed that systematic reviews and publication of guidelines would ensure timely delivery of effective care, but this has not proved to be the case. While there are many reasons to explain shortcomings in healthcare delivery, the lack of patient and carer involvement in the planning of research, evidence review, guideline development and guideline implementation is most compelling. To achieve adherence to evidence-based guidelines consistently across all levels of the health service requires the implementation of integrated care with clear pathways through which patients can navigate. Quality improvement methodology could be employed to plan and implement integrated care pathways (ICPs). There is evidence that ICPs achieve improved outcomes for acute hospital-based interventions, but less work has focussed on long-term conditions where more diverse agencies are involved. At all stages, stakeholder representation from the full range of healthcare professionals, patients, their families, social services, education, local government and employers must be involved. In this article we review the step-wise and iterative process by which knowledge is implemented into practice to improve patient experience and outcomes We argue how this process can benefit from the involvement of patients and their carers as equal partners, and we discuss how different initiatives have involved patients with allergic diseases. There currently is a gap in evidence that links patient involvement to improved outcomes. We recommend the use of the Core Outcome Sets (COS) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) which have been developed for allergic diseases to monitor the effects of implementation research and the impact of patient and carer involvement on outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将患者纳入计划,消除过敏知识实践差距。
从首次公布具有疗效的新疗法到将其成功应用于临床实践之间存在着巨大的差距。在许多方面,过敏性疾病的治疗就是知识/实践差距的典范。人们原以为系统性综述和指南的出版能确保及时提供有效的治疗,但事实证明并非如此。虽然有很多原因可以解释医疗保健服务中存在的不足,但患者和护理人员在研究规划、证据审查、指南制定和指南实施中缺乏参与是最令人信服的。要想在各级医疗服务中始终如一地遵守循证指南,就必须实施综合护理,为患者提供清晰的路径。质量改进方法可用于规划和实施综合护理路径(ICPs)。有证据表明,综合护理路径改善了以急症医院为基础的干预措施的效果,但对于涉及更多不同机构的长期病症,这方面的工作较少。在各个阶段,都必须有来自医疗保健专业人员、患者、患者家属、社会服务、教育、地方政府和雇主等各方面的利益相关者参与。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了将知识转化为实践以改善患者体验和治疗效果的循序渐进的迭代过程。我们论证了患者及其照护者作为平等伙伴的参与如何使这一过程受益,并讨论了不同的倡议如何让过敏性疾病患者参与其中。目前,将患者参与与改善疗效联系起来的证据还很缺乏。我们建议使用针对过敏性疾病开发的核心结果集 (COS) 和患者报告体验测量 (PREMS),以监测实施研究的效果以及患者和照护者参与对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
期刊最新文献
Alternatives to Injectable Adrenaline for Treating Anaphylaxis. Milk Component IgE/IgG4 Levels for Diagnosis of Cow Milk Protein Allergy in Sensitised Children-A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study. Linking Macronutrient Composition of Common Allergenic Foods to European and North American Food Allergy Prevalence. Defining Optimal Basophil Passive Sensitisation Parameters. Shaping Allergy Training in the UK Foundation Programme: A National Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1