Clinical Use of Bedside Portable Ultra-Low-Field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From the Multicenter SAFE MRI ECMO Study.

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy & Fuels Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069187
Sung-Min Cho, Shivalika Khanduja, Christopher Wilcox, Kha Dinh, Jiah Kim, Jin Kook Kang, Ifeanyi David Chinedozi, Zachary Darby, Matthew Acton, Hannah Rando, Jessica Briscoe, Errol L Bush, Haris I Sair, John Pitts, Lori R Arlinghaus, Audrey-Carelle N Wandji, Elena Moreno, Glenda Torres, Bindu Akkanti, Jose Gavito-Higuera, Steven Keller, HuiMahn A Choi, Bo Soo Kim, Aaron Gusdon, Glenn J Whitman
{"title":"Clinical Use of Bedside Portable Ultra-Low-Field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From the Multicenter SAFE MRI ECMO Study.","authors":"Sung-Min Cho, Shivalika Khanduja, Christopher Wilcox, Kha Dinh, Jiah Kim, Jin Kook Kang, Ifeanyi David Chinedozi, Zachary Darby, Matthew Acton, Hannah Rando, Jessica Briscoe, Errol L Bush, Haris I Sair, John Pitts, Lori R Arlinghaus, Audrey-Carelle N Wandji, Elena Moreno, Glenda Torres, Bindu Akkanti, Jose Gavito-Higuera, Steven Keller, HuiMahn A Choi, Bo Soo Kim, Aaron Gusdon, Glenn J Whitman","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of acute brain injury (ABI) at the bedside is critical in improving survival for patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We aimed to examine the safety of ultra-low-field (ULF; 0.064-T) portable magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) in patients undergoing ECMO and to investigate the ABI frequency and types with ULF-pMRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter prospective observational study (SAFE MRI ECMO study [Assessing the Safety and Feasibility of Bedside Portable Low-Field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on ECMO]; NCT05469139) from 2 tertiary centers (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD and University of Texas-Houston) with specially trained intensive care units. Primary outcomes were safety of ULF-pMRI during ECMO support, defined as completion of ULF-pMRI without significant adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 53 eligible patients, 3 were not scanned because of a large head size that did not fit within the head coil. ULF-pMRI was performed in 50 patients (median age, 58 years; 52% male), with 34 patients (68%) on venoarterial ECMO and 16 patients (32%) on venovenous ECMO. Of 34 patients on venoarterial ECMO, 11 (22%) were centrally cannulated and 23 (46%) were peripherally cannulated. In venovenous ECMO, 9 (18%) had single-lumen cannulation and 7 (14%) had double-lumen cannulation. Of 50 patients, adverse events occurred in 3 patients (6%), with 2 minor adverse events (ECMO suction event; transient low ECMO flow) and one serious adverse event (intra-aortic balloon pump malfunction attributable to electrocardiographic artifacts). All images demonstrated discernible intracranial pathologies with good quality. ABI was observed in 22 patients (44%). Ischemic stroke (36%) was the most common type of ABI, followed by intracranial hemorrhage (6%) and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (4%). Of 18 patients (36%) with both ULF-pMRI and head computed tomography within 24 hours, ABI was observed in 9 patients with a total of 10 events (8 ischemic, 2 hemorrhagic events). Of the 8 ischemic events, pMRI observed all 8, and head computed tomography observed only 4 events. For intracranial hemorrhage, pMRI observed only 1 of them, and head computed tomography observed both (2 events).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that ULF-pMRI can be performed in patients on ECMO across different ECMO cannulation strategies in specially trained intensive care units. The incidence of ABI was high, seen in 44% of ULF-pMRI studies. ULF-pMRI imaging appears to be more sensitive to ABI, particularly ischemic stroke, compared with head computed tomography.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection of acute brain injury (ABI) at the bedside is critical in improving survival for patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We aimed to examine the safety of ultra-low-field (ULF; 0.064-T) portable magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) in patients undergoing ECMO and to investigate the ABI frequency and types with ULF-pMRI.

Methods: This was a multicenter prospective observational study (SAFE MRI ECMO study [Assessing the Safety and Feasibility of Bedside Portable Low-Field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on ECMO]; NCT05469139) from 2 tertiary centers (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD and University of Texas-Houston) with specially trained intensive care units. Primary outcomes were safety of ULF-pMRI during ECMO support, defined as completion of ULF-pMRI without significant adverse events.

Results: Of 53 eligible patients, 3 were not scanned because of a large head size that did not fit within the head coil. ULF-pMRI was performed in 50 patients (median age, 58 years; 52% male), with 34 patients (68%) on venoarterial ECMO and 16 patients (32%) on venovenous ECMO. Of 34 patients on venoarterial ECMO, 11 (22%) were centrally cannulated and 23 (46%) were peripherally cannulated. In venovenous ECMO, 9 (18%) had single-lumen cannulation and 7 (14%) had double-lumen cannulation. Of 50 patients, adverse events occurred in 3 patients (6%), with 2 minor adverse events (ECMO suction event; transient low ECMO flow) and one serious adverse event (intra-aortic balloon pump malfunction attributable to electrocardiographic artifacts). All images demonstrated discernible intracranial pathologies with good quality. ABI was observed in 22 patients (44%). Ischemic stroke (36%) was the most common type of ABI, followed by intracranial hemorrhage (6%) and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (4%). Of 18 patients (36%) with both ULF-pMRI and head computed tomography within 24 hours, ABI was observed in 9 patients with a total of 10 events (8 ischemic, 2 hemorrhagic events). Of the 8 ischemic events, pMRI observed all 8, and head computed tomography observed only 4 events. For intracranial hemorrhage, pMRI observed only 1 of them, and head computed tomography observed both (2 events).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that ULF-pMRI can be performed in patients on ECMO across different ECMO cannulation strategies in specially trained intensive care units. The incidence of ABI was high, seen in 44% of ULF-pMRI studies. ULF-pMRI imaging appears to be more sensitive to ABI, particularly ischemic stroke, compared with head computed tomography.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外膜氧合患者床旁便携式超低场脑磁共振成像的临床应用:多中心 SAFE MRI ECMO 研究的结果。
背景:床旁早期发现急性脑损伤(ABI)对于提高体外膜氧合(ECMO)患者的存活率至关重要。我们旨在研究超低场(ULF;0.064-T)便携式磁共振成像(pMRI)在接受 ECMO 患者中的安全性,并调查超低场-pMRI 的 ABI 频率和类型:这是一项多中心前瞻性观察研究(SAFE MRI ECMO 研究 [Assessing the Safety and Feasibility of Bedside Portable Low-Field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on ECMO]; NCT05469139),由两家拥有经过专门培训的重症监护室的三级医疗中心(马里兰州巴尔的摩市约翰霍普金斯大学和德克萨斯大学休斯顿分校)进行。主要结果是在 ECMO 支持期间 ULF-pMRI 的安全性,即完成 ULF-pMRI 时无重大不良事件发生:结果:在 53 名符合条件的患者中,有 3 名患者因头部过大无法放入头部线圈而未进行扫描。对 50 名患者(中位年龄 58 岁;52% 为男性)进行了超低频-pMRI 扫描,其中 34 名患者(68%)使用静脉 ECMO,16 名患者(32%)使用静脉 ECMO。在 34 名静脉 ECMO 患者中,11 人(22%)为中心插管,23 人(46%)为外周插管。在静脉 ECMO 中,9 人(18%)采用单腔插管,7 人(14%)采用双腔插管。在 50 名患者中,有 3 名患者(6%)发生了不良事件,其中 2 例为轻微不良事件(ECMO 抽吸事件;一过性 ECMO 流量低),1 例为严重不良事件(心电图伪影导致主动脉内球囊泵故障)。所有图像都显示了可辨认的颅内病变,图像质量良好。22 名患者(44%)观察到 ABI。缺血性中风(36%)是最常见的 ABI 类型,其次是颅内出血(6%)和缺氧缺血性脑损伤(4%)。18 名患者(36%)在 24 小时内同时进行了超低频-pMRI 和头部计算机断层扫描,其中 9 名患者观察到 ABI,共发生 10 起事件(8 起缺血性事件,2 起出血性事件)。在 8 例缺血事件中,pMRI 观察到全部 8 例,而头部计算机断层扫描仅观察到 4 例。对于颅内出血,pMRI 仅观察到其中的 1 例,而头部计算机断层扫描则同时观察到 2 例:我们的研究表明,在经过专门培训的重症监护病房中,超低频-pMRI 可用于不同 ECMO 插管策略的 ECMO 患者。ABI 的发生率很高,在 44% 的超低频-pMRI 研究中都能看到。与头部计算机断层扫描相比,超低频磁共振成像似乎对 ABI 更为敏感,尤其是缺血性中风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
期刊最新文献
A Tale of Two Maladies: Interplay of Mendelian Principles. Randomized Crossover Trial of 2-Week Ketone Ester Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Contributes to Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome. Myocardial Ischemic Syndromes: A New Nomenclature to Harmonize Evolving International Clinical Practice Guidelines. Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Chinese Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: The Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center Iberis-HTN Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1