Improving Well-Being Through Digital Detoxification Among Social Media Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1089/cyber.2023.0742
Sameer Ansari, Naved Iqbal, Ahmad Azeem, Kainaat Danyal
{"title":"Improving Well-Being Through Digital Detoxification Among Social Media Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sameer Ansari, Naved Iqbal, Ahmad Azeem, Kainaat Danyal","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2023.0742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital detoxification is a conscious disconnection from all smartphone activities for a certain period of time, which has been undertaken as effective by researchers to improve well-being, but studies found inconsistent results, with a primary focus on negative well-being, thus necessitating a need to focus on the positive aspect. As a result, the current study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess digital detoxification and its influence on users subjective and psychological well-being (PWB). A comprehensive search (up to November 19, 2023) across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Pro-Quest, and Google Search yielded a total of 26 eligible studies (18 for meta-analysis) comprising 8,147 participants (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 25.20 years). The Studies' quality was assessed using Cochrane's updated Risk of Bias Tool, and statistical analysis was performed in R Studio. Digital detoxification was found to be effective in improving subjective well-being (SWB) (Standardized mean difference [<i>SMD</i>] = 0.21, <i>95% CI</i>: 0.06, 0.34; <i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 73.6%, <i>n</i> = 14 papers), as well as PWB (<i>SMD</i> = 0.27, <i>95% CI</i>: 0.09, 0.46; <i>p</i> < 0.05; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.0%, <i>n</i> = 4 papers). Notably, we detected no publication bias but addressed funnel plot asymmetry using Trim & Fill. Moderation analysis revealed the impact of internet coverage, developmental status, location, intervention effectiveness, and risk of bias on the estimated effect size for SWB. Meta-regression highlighted the significant influence of mean age, and although no potential outliers were identified, influential plots are provided for transparency. Our findings consolidate the efficacy of digital detoxification, emphasizing the need for nuanced consideration of study factors. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on digital well-being, offering valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":" ","pages":"753-770"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital detoxification is a conscious disconnection from all smartphone activities for a certain period of time, which has been undertaken as effective by researchers to improve well-being, but studies found inconsistent results, with a primary focus on negative well-being, thus necessitating a need to focus on the positive aspect. As a result, the current study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess digital detoxification and its influence on users subjective and psychological well-being (PWB). A comprehensive search (up to November 19, 2023) across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Pro-Quest, and Google Search yielded a total of 26 eligible studies (18 for meta-analysis) comprising 8,147 participants (Mage = 25.20 years). The Studies' quality was assessed using Cochrane's updated Risk of Bias Tool, and statistical analysis was performed in R Studio. Digital detoxification was found to be effective in improving subjective well-being (SWB) (Standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.34; p < 0.01, I2 = 73.6%, n = 14 papers), as well as PWB (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.46; p < 0.05; I2 = 0.0%, n = 4 papers). Notably, we detected no publication bias but addressed funnel plot asymmetry using Trim & Fill. Moderation analysis revealed the impact of internet coverage, developmental status, location, intervention effectiveness, and risk of bias on the estimated effect size for SWB. Meta-regression highlighted the significant influence of mean age, and although no potential outliers were identified, influential plots are provided for transparency. Our findings consolidate the efficacy of digital detoxification, emphasizing the need for nuanced consideration of study factors. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on digital well-being, offering valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社交媒体用户的数字排毒来改善幸福感:系统回顾与元分析》。
数字排毒是指在一段时间内有意识地断开与所有智能手机活动的连接,研究人员认为这种方法能有效提高幸福感,但研究发现结果并不一致,主要集中在消极幸福感方面,因此有必要关注积极方面。因此,本研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估数字排毒及其对用户主观心理健康(PWB)的影响。通过对 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Pro-Quest 和 Google Search 等数据库进行全面检索(截至 2023 年 11 月 19 日),共获得 26 项符合条件的研究(18 项用于荟萃分析),包括 8,147 名参与者(Mage = 25.20 岁)。研究质量由 Cochrane 更新的偏倚风险工具进行评估,统计分析由 R Studio 进行。研究发现,数字排毒可有效改善主观幸福感(SWB)(标准化平均差 [SMD] = 0.21,95% CI:0.06,0.34;P < 0.01,I2 = 73.6%,n = 14 篇论文)以及脉搏搏波(SMD = 0.27,95% CI:0.09,0.46;P < 0.05;I2 = 0.0%,n = 4 篇论文)。值得注意的是,我们没有发现发表偏倚,但使用修剪与填充法解决了漏斗图不对称的问题。调节分析显示了互联网覆盖率、发展状况、地点、干预效果和偏倚风险对估计的 SWB 效果大小的影响。元回归凸显了平均年龄的重要影响,虽然没有发现潜在的异常值,但为了透明起见,我们提供了影响图。我们的研究结果巩固了数字排毒的功效,强调了对研究因素进行细致考虑的必要性。这项研究为当前有关数字福祉的讨论做出了贡献,为研究人员、从业人员和政策制定者提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
期刊最新文献
Testing the Proteus Effect in Autistic and Neurotypical Participants. Dark Triad Personality Traits and Cyberbullying: The Mediating Role of Emotional Empathy. Supporting Teachers and Students: The Role of AI in Shaping the Future of Education. Zoom Fatigue and Facial Dissatisfaction Relate to Virtual Meeting Engagement Differently in the U.S. and South Korean Contexts. Anonymous and Insecure Bullies are Less Depressed than Confident and Identifiable Ones, but Only if Remorseful: Cyberbullying Goals, Identifiability, and Depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1