Current evidence in support of insect-friendly lighting practices

IF 5.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOLOGY Current opinion in insect science Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cois.2024.101276
Avalon CS Owens , Michael JO Pocock , Brett M Seymoure
{"title":"Current evidence in support of insect-friendly lighting practices","authors":"Avalon CS Owens ,&nbsp;Michael JO Pocock ,&nbsp;Brett M Seymoure","doi":"10.1016/j.cois.2024.101276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic light pollution is an emerging threat to natural ecosystems with myriad effects on insects in particular. Insect conservationists are increasingly interested in mitigating this driver of insect declines via sustainable lighting practices. Current recommendations often follow the five principles for responsible outdoor lighting developed by DarkSky International, a nonprofit organization founded by astronomers. While these principles unquestionably increase star visibility, their ecological costs and benefits remain relatively unexplored. Herein, we review recent research into the effects of each principle on insect fitness broadly defined. Most studies test the efficacy of spectral tuning, followed by dimming, although both mitigation methods seem generally ineffective in practice. In contrast, both shielding and motion detectors show promise as mitigation methods but remain remarkably understudied. Nonetheless, a preponderance of evidence now demonstrates that removing unnecessary light sources from natural habitats can reverse their varied impacts on diverse insect taxa and greatly benefit insect conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11038,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in insect science","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101276"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in insect science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574524001184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic light pollution is an emerging threat to natural ecosystems with myriad effects on insects in particular. Insect conservationists are increasingly interested in mitigating this driver of insect declines via sustainable lighting practices. Current recommendations often follow the five principles for responsible outdoor lighting developed by DarkSky International, a nonprofit organization founded by astronomers. While these principles unquestionably increase star visibility, their ecological costs and benefits remain relatively unexplored. Herein, we review recent research into the effects of each principle on insect fitness broadly defined. Most studies test the efficacy of spectral tuning, followed by dimming, although both mitigation methods seem generally ineffective in practice. In contrast, both shielding and motion detectors show promise as mitigation methods but remain remarkably understudied. Nonetheless, a preponderance of evidence now demonstrates that removing unnecessary light sources from natural habitats can reverse their varied impacts on diverse insect taxa and greatly benefit insect conservation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持昆虫友好型照明做法的现有证据。
人为光污染是自然生态系统面临的新威胁,尤其对昆虫产生了无数影响。昆虫保护主义者越来越希望通过可持续照明实践来缓解这一导致昆虫数量下降的因素。目前的建议通常遵循由天文学家创立的非营利组织 "黑暗天空国际"(DarkSky International)制定的负责任的户外照明五项原则。虽然这些原则无疑提高了星星的能见度,但其生态成本和效益仍相对较低。在此,我们回顾了最近有关每项原则对广义昆虫适应性影响的研究。大多数研究都测试了光谱调谐的效果,然后是调暗,尽管这两种缓解方法在实践中似乎普遍无效。与此相反,屏蔽和运动探测器都显示出作为缓解方法的前景,但研究仍然明显不足。尽管如此,大量证据表明,从自然栖息地移除不必要的光源可以扭转光源对不同昆虫类群的不同影响,并对昆虫保护大有裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in insect science
Current opinion in insect science BIOLOGYECOLOGYENTOMOLOGY-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Insect Science is a new systematic review journal that aims to provide specialists with a unique and educational platform to keep up–to–date with the expanding volume of information published in the field of Insect Science. As this is such a broad discipline, we have determined themed sections each of which is reviewed once a year. The following 11 areas are covered by Current Opinion in Insect Science. -Ecology -Insect genomics -Global Change Biology -Molecular Physiology (Including Immunity) -Pests and Resistance -Parasites, Parasitoids and Biological Control -Behavioural Ecology -Development and Regulation -Social Insects -Neuroscience -Vectors and Medical and Veterinary Entomology There is also a section that changes every year to reflect hot topics in the field. Section Editors, who are major authorities in their area, are appointed by the Editors of the journal. They divide their section into a number of topics, ensuring that the field is comprehensively covered and that all issues of current importance are emphasized. Section Editors commission articles from leading scientists on each topic that they have selected and the commissioned authors write short review articles in which they present recent developments in their subject, emphasizing the aspects that, in their opinion, are most important. In addition, they provide short annotations to the papers that they consider to be most interesting from all those published in their topic over the previous year.
期刊最新文献
Adapting to change: Bee pollinator signatures in anthropized environments. Anticipating evolutionary responses of mosquito mating systems to population suppression with mass-reared males. Olfactory coding in the mosquito antennal lobe: labeled lines or combinatorial code? Genomics of insect natural enemies in agroecosystems. Large-scale omics analyses of nutrition-responsive mechanisms of female germline stem cell proliferation and maintenance in Drosophila melanogaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1