Cardiorespiratory fitness, atrial fibrillation and stroke: a review of the evidence in 2024.

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1080/14779072.2024.2409440
Setor K Kunutsor, Sudhir Kurl, Jari A Laukkanen
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory fitness, atrial fibrillation and stroke: a review of the evidence in 2024.","authors":"Setor K Kunutsor, Sudhir Kurl, Jari A Laukkanen","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2024.2409440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The body of evidence linking cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels with the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke - two interconnected cardiovascular conditions - is not entirely consistent. Furthermore, specific CRF thresholds beyond which the risk of AF or stroke might not decrease are not well defined.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review summarizes research evidence on the role of CRF in the development of AF and stroke including dose-response relationships in general population participants, explores the biological mechanisms through which CRF may exert its effects, assesses the potential implications for clinical care and population health, identifies gaps in the current evidence, and suggest directions for future research. MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception until July 2024 to identify observational longitudinal and interventional studies as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to these study designs.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In the general population, increasing levels of CRF, achieved through consistent physical activity, can significantly reduce the likelihood of developing AF and stroke. The findings also advocate for a tailored approach to exercise prescriptions, acknowledging the plateau in benefits for AF risk beyond certain CRF levels, while advocating for higher intensity or prolonged activity to further reduce stroke risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"493-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2409440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The body of evidence linking cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels with the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke - two interconnected cardiovascular conditions - is not entirely consistent. Furthermore, specific CRF thresholds beyond which the risk of AF or stroke might not decrease are not well defined.

Areas covered: This review summarizes research evidence on the role of CRF in the development of AF and stroke including dose-response relationships in general population participants, explores the biological mechanisms through which CRF may exert its effects, assesses the potential implications for clinical care and population health, identifies gaps in the current evidence, and suggest directions for future research. MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception until July 2024 to identify observational longitudinal and interventional studies as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to these study designs.

Expert opinion: In the general population, increasing levels of CRF, achieved through consistent physical activity, can significantly reduce the likelihood of developing AF and stroke. The findings also advocate for a tailored approach to exercise prescriptions, acknowledging the plateau in benefits for AF risk beyond certain CRF levels, while advocating for higher intensity or prolonged activity to further reduce stroke risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肺功能、心房颤动与中风:2024 年证据回顾。
导言:心肺功能(CRF)水平与心房颤动(AF)和中风这两种相互关联的心血管疾病的风险之间的联系证据并不完全一致。此外,心房颤动或中风风险不会降低的具体 CRF 临界值也没有得到很好的界定:本综述总结了 CRF 在心房颤动和中风发病中作用的研究证据,包括在普通人群中的剂量-反应关系,探讨了 CRF 发挥作用的生物学机制,评估了 CRF 对临床护理和人群健康的潜在影响,确定了当前证据中的不足之处,并提出了未来的研究方向。研究人员检索了从开始到2024年7月的MEDLINE和Embase,以确定观察性纵向研究和干预性研究,以及与这些研究设计相关的系统综述和荟萃分析:专家观点:在普通人群中,通过坚持体育锻炼来提高心房颤动负荷水平,可显著降低罹患心房颤动和中风的可能性。研究结果还提倡采取量身定制的运动处方,承认超过一定的 CRF 水平后,对房颤风险的益处将趋于稳定,同时提倡进行更高强度或更长时间的活动,以进一步降低中风风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Risk management of patients with multiple CVDs: what are the best practices? Contemporary review of the evolution of various treatment modalities for mitral regurgitation. Treatment of hypertension in the elderly: target the lowest well tolerated blood pressure. Short-term and long-term outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with cardiogenic shock. Nattokinase as an adjuvant therapeutic strategy for non-communicable diseases: a review of fibrinolytic, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1