A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy variants for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Psychotraumatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1080/20008066.2024.2406662
Karin Prillinger, Andreas Goreis, Sarah Macura, Carola Hajek Gross, Annika Lozar, Selina Fanninger, Anna Mayer, Claudia Oppenauer, Paul L Plener, Oswald D Kothgassner
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy variants for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.","authors":"Karin Prillinger, Andreas Goreis, Sarah Macura, Carola Hajek Gross, Annika Lozar, Selina Fanninger, Anna Mayer, Claudia Oppenauer, Paul L Plener, Oswald D Kothgassner","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2024.2406662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While there are well-established treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), these interventions appear to be less effective for individuals with comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptoms. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for PTSD and DBT Prolonged Exposure (PE) are both effective interventions for treating these patients, but a comprehensive analysis evaluating the efficacy of these two interventions is lacking.<b>Objective:</b> To determine the effect sizes of PTSD-specific DBT treatments.<b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review and pre-registered meta-analysis of the DBT literature for treating PTSD (osf.io/62rfq). Eligible trials and treatment evaluations published before September 2023 were searched in SCOPUS, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Thirteen articles were identified, and data were extracted for primary (PTSD symptoms) and secondary outcomes (BPD, depression, dissociation, non-suicidal self-injury [NSSI]). Treatment effects were calculated for randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and pre-post evaluations.<b>Results:</b> Overall, the studies involved 663 participants. Compared with control groups, PTSD-specific DBT treatments showed moderate effects in reducing PTSD symptom severity <i>g</i> = -0.69 (95% CI -1.03 to -0.34, <i>p</i> < .001) and depression <i>g</i> = -0.62 (95% CI -1.13 to -0.12, <i>p</i> = .016). Moreover, the pre-post changes showed an overall effect size for dissociative symptoms of <i>g</i> = -0.72 (95% CI -1.05 to -0.40, <i>p</i> < .001), for BPD-associated symptoms of <i>g</i> = -0.82 (95% CI -1.06 to -0.59, <i>p</i> < .001), and for NSSI frequency (<i>g</i> = -0.70, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.28, <i>p</i> = .001).<b>Conclusions:</b> Based on the results of our meta-analysis, DBT-PTSD and DBT PE were effective in reducing PTSD symptom severity and comorbid depressive symptoms. Further research on stage-based treatments should focus on systematically assessing NSSI, BPD symptoms, and suicidality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"15 1","pages":"2406662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2406662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While there are well-established treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), these interventions appear to be less effective for individuals with comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptoms. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for PTSD and DBT Prolonged Exposure (PE) are both effective interventions for treating these patients, but a comprehensive analysis evaluating the efficacy of these two interventions is lacking.Objective: To determine the effect sizes of PTSD-specific DBT treatments.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and pre-registered meta-analysis of the DBT literature for treating PTSD (osf.io/62rfq). Eligible trials and treatment evaluations published before September 2023 were searched in SCOPUS, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Thirteen articles were identified, and data were extracted for primary (PTSD symptoms) and secondary outcomes (BPD, depression, dissociation, non-suicidal self-injury [NSSI]). Treatment effects were calculated for randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and pre-post evaluations.Results: Overall, the studies involved 663 participants. Compared with control groups, PTSD-specific DBT treatments showed moderate effects in reducing PTSD symptom severity g = -0.69 (95% CI -1.03 to -0.34, p < .001) and depression g = -0.62 (95% CI -1.13 to -0.12, p = .016). Moreover, the pre-post changes showed an overall effect size for dissociative symptoms of g = -0.72 (95% CI -1.05 to -0.40, p < .001), for BPD-associated symptoms of g = -0.82 (95% CI -1.06 to -0.59, p < .001), and for NSSI frequency (g = -0.70, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.28, p = .001).Conclusions: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, DBT-PTSD and DBT PE were effective in reducing PTSD symptom severity and comorbid depressive symptoms. Further research on stage-based treatments should focus on systematically assessing NSSI, BPD symptoms, and suicidality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于辩证行为疗法变体治疗创伤后应激障碍疗效的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:虽然创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)有成熟的治疗方法,但这些干预措施对合并有边缘型人格障碍(BPD)症状的患者似乎效果较差。针对创伤后应激障碍的辩证行为疗法(DBT)和DBT延长暴露疗法(PE)都是治疗这些患者的有效干预措施,但目前还缺乏对这两种干预措施疗效的全面分析评估:目的:确定 PTSD 特异性 DBT 治疗的效应大小:我们对治疗创伤后应激障碍的 DBT 文献(osf.io/62rfq)进行了系统回顾和预先注册的荟萃分析。我们在 SCOPUS、PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中检索了 2023 年 9 月之前发表的符合条件的试验和治疗评估。确定了 13 篇文章,并提取了主要结果(创伤后应激障碍症状)和次要结果(BPD、抑郁、解离、非自杀性自伤 [NSSI])的数据。计算了随机对照试验、临床对照试验和前后评价的治疗效果:这些研究共涉及 663 名参与者。与对照组相比,创伤后应激障碍特异性 DBT 治疗在降低创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度方面显示出中等效果 g = -0.69 (95% CI -1.03 to -0.34, p g = -0.62 (95% CI -1.13 to -0.12, p = .016)。此外,前后变化对分离症状的总体影响大小为 g = -0.72 (95% CI -1.05 to -0.40, p g = -0.82 (95% CI -1.06 to -0.59, p g = -0.70, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.28, p = .001):根据我们的荟萃分析结果,DBT-PTSD 和 DBT PE 能有效降低创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度和合并抑郁症状。对基于阶段的治疗方法的进一步研究应侧重于系统评估 NSSI、BPD 症状和自杀倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
期刊最新文献
Atrophy in the supramarginal gyrus associated with impaired cognitive inhibition in grieving Chinese Shidu parents Dynamic networks of complex posttraumatic stress disorder and depression among college students with childhood trauma: insights from cross-sectional and cross-lagged panel network analysis A novel intervention for acute stress reaction: exploring the feasibility of ReSTART among Norwegian soldiers Wellbeing and illbeing in women exposed to physical and sexual violence during peripregnancy: a population-based longitudinal study Childhood-related PTSD: the role of cognitions in EMDR and imagery rescripting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1