Survival impact of pathologic features after salvage lung resection following definitive chemoradiotherapy or systemic therapy for initially unresectable lung cancer.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s11748-024-02086-y
Naoyuki Oka, Tomoyuki Hishida, Kaoru Kaseda, Yuri Suzuki, Yu Okubo, Kyohei Masai, Keisuke Asakura, Katsura Emoto, Hisao Asamura
{"title":"Survival impact of pathologic features after salvage lung resection following definitive chemoradiotherapy or systemic therapy for initially unresectable lung cancer.","authors":"Naoyuki Oka, Tomoyuki Hishida, Kaoru Kaseda, Yuri Suzuki, Yu Okubo, Kyohei Masai, Keisuke Asakura, Katsura Emoto, Hisao Asamura","doi":"10.1007/s11748-024-02086-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Salvage surgery for primary lung cancer is expected to become increasingly common. This study aimed to clarify the survival impact of pathologic characteristics after salvage surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent salvage surgery following definitive chemoradiotherapy or systemic therapy for initially unresectable lung cancer from 2010 to 2020 were enrolled in this study. The tumor slides were reviewed to determine the size of the tumor bed and the proportions of viable tumor, necrosis, and stroma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 patients were evaluated, and 18 had clinical stage IIIB-IV disease. Six received chemoradiotherapy and 17 received systemic therapy alone. A major pathologic response (MPR, ≤ 10% of viable tumor) was observed in 6 patients, and 4 patients achieved a pathological complete response. The 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates (OS and RFS) were 78.6% and 59.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with and without MPR, and even non-MPR patients achieved a favorable 3-year OS of 70.2%. Meanwhile, patients with high (≥ 30%) stroma showed significantly better OS than those with low (< 30%) stroma (3-year OS: 100% vs. 23.3%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that the proportion of stroma can be useful for predicting long-term survival after salvage surgery. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm the current findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-024-02086-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Salvage surgery for primary lung cancer is expected to become increasingly common. This study aimed to clarify the survival impact of pathologic characteristics after salvage surgery.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent salvage surgery following definitive chemoradiotherapy or systemic therapy for initially unresectable lung cancer from 2010 to 2020 were enrolled in this study. The tumor slides were reviewed to determine the size of the tumor bed and the proportions of viable tumor, necrosis, and stroma.

Results: A total of 23 patients were evaluated, and 18 had clinical stage IIIB-IV disease. Six received chemoradiotherapy and 17 received systemic therapy alone. A major pathologic response (MPR, ≤ 10% of viable tumor) was observed in 6 patients, and 4 patients achieved a pathological complete response. The 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates (OS and RFS) were 78.6% and 59.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with and without MPR, and even non-MPR patients achieved a favorable 3-year OS of 70.2%. Meanwhile, patients with high (≥ 30%) stroma showed significantly better OS than those with low (< 30%) stroma (3-year OS: 100% vs. 23.3%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study showed that the proportion of stroma can be useful for predicting long-term survival after salvage surgery. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm the current findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最初无法切除的肺癌患者在接受明确的化放疗或全身治疗后进行挽救性肺切除术,其病理特征对存活率的影响。
目的:原发性肺癌的挽救手术预计会越来越常见。本研究旨在阐明挽救手术后病理特征对生存的影响:本研究选取了 2010 年至 2020 年间因最初无法切除的肺癌接受明确化放疗或全身治疗后接受挽救手术的连续患者。对肿瘤切片进行审查,以确定肿瘤床的大小以及存活肿瘤、坏死和基质的比例:共对 23 名患者进行了评估,其中 18 名患者的疾病处于临床 IIIB-IV 期。6名患者接受了化放疗,17名患者只接受了全身治疗。6名患者观察到主要病理反应(MPR,存活肿瘤≤10%),4名患者获得病理完全反应。3年总生存率和无复发生存率(OS和RFS)分别为78.6%和59.2%。MPR患者和非MPR患者的OS无明显差异,即使非MPR患者的3年OS也达到了70.2%。同时,基质含量高(≥ 30%)的患者的 OS 明显优于基质含量低的患者:本研究表明,基质比例有助于预测挽救手术后的长期生存率。有必要进一步开展大规模研究,以证实目前的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung abnormalities. Lessons from short chest drain management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Long-term results of the frozen elephant trunk technique in primary chronic type B aortic dissection. A balanced mitral leaflet and large ring strategy avoids systolic anterior motion in Barlow's disease. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1