Real-world results of first-line immunotherapy or targeted therapy for metastatic melanoma in Finland: a cohort study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Future oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2024.2403329
Kalle E Mattila, Leena Tiainen, Johanna Vikkula, Anna Kreutzman, Mia Engström-Risku, Kai Kysenius, Olivia Hölsä, Sari Hernesniemi, Päivikki Hemmilä, Anssi Pystynen, Siru Mäkelä
{"title":"Real-world results of first-line immunotherapy or targeted therapy for metastatic melanoma in Finland: a cohort study.","authors":"Kalle E Mattila, Leena Tiainen, Johanna Vikkula, Anna Kreutzman, Mia Engström-Risku, Kai Kysenius, Olivia Hölsä, Sari Hernesniemi, Päivikki Hemmilä, Anssi Pystynen, Siru Mäkelä","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2024.2403329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> First-line (1L) immunotherapy has yielded superior overall survival (OS) in metastatic melanoma (MM) but some patients are ineligible for immunotherapy or need rapid response with 1L targeted therapy (TT).<b>Materials & methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study of real-world patients treated with 1L immunotherapy (144 <i>BRAF</i> wild type, 85 <i>BRAF</i>-mutated) or 1L TT (143 <i>BRAF</i>-mutated) for MM in Finland during 2014-2021.<b>Results:</b> Baseline brain metastases, liver metastases and elevated LDH were less common, 2-year OS rates were higher (60.3-63.5% vs. 33.8%) and more patients were alive without the next-line treatment (38.0-43.8% vs. 23.3%) in patients with 1L immunotherapy.<b>Conclusion:</b> Real-world patients with 1L immunotherapy for MM had favorable baseline characteristics and better treatment outcomes than observed in patients with 1L TT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2024.2403329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: First-line (1L) immunotherapy has yielded superior overall survival (OS) in metastatic melanoma (MM) but some patients are ineligible for immunotherapy or need rapid response with 1L targeted therapy (TT).Materials & methods: Retrospective cohort study of real-world patients treated with 1L immunotherapy (144 BRAF wild type, 85 BRAF-mutated) or 1L TT (143 BRAF-mutated) for MM in Finland during 2014-2021.Results: Baseline brain metastases, liver metastases and elevated LDH were less common, 2-year OS rates were higher (60.3-63.5% vs. 33.8%) and more patients were alive without the next-line treatment (38.0-43.8% vs. 23.3%) in patients with 1L immunotherapy.Conclusion: Real-world patients with 1L immunotherapy for MM had favorable baseline characteristics and better treatment outcomes than observed in patients with 1L TT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰转移性黑色素瘤一线免疫疗法或靶向疗法的实际效果:一项队列研究。
目的:一线(1L)免疫疗法在转移性黑色素瘤(MM)中取得了较好的总生存率(OS),但有些患者不符合免疫疗法的条件,或者需要1L靶向疗法(TT)的快速反应:回顾性队列研究:2014-2021年间芬兰接受1L免疫疗法(144例BRAF野生型、85例BRAF突变型)或1L TT(143例BRAF突变型)治疗的MM患者的真实世界:结果:接受1L免疫治疗的患者中,基线脑转移、肝转移和LDH升高的情况较少,2年OS率较高(60.3-63.5% vs. 33.8%),更多患者在未接受下线治疗的情况下存活(38.0-43.8% vs. 23.3%):结论:与1L TT患者相比,接受1L免疫治疗的MM患者具有良好的基线特征和更好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy and safety of eribulin versus paclitaxel in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multimodality high-frequency ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical malignant lymphoma before biopsy. Genetic variants in mitochondrial sirtuins associated with brain tumor risk: a case-control study. Physician preferences of biomarker testing strategies in newly diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients. Testosterone recovery post discontinuation of androgen deprivation for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1