{"title":"A classification model for resectability in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.","authors":"Ikuo Nakamura, Tomoaki Yoh, Takashi Nishimura, Masayuki Okuno, Tomohiro Okamoto, Hideaki Sueoka, Kenjiro Iida, Masaharu Tada, Takamichi Ishii, Satoru Seo, Yasuhiro Fujimoto, Hiroko Iijima, Seiko Hirono, Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Some patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new resectability classification for patients with HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We classified patients into three categories: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). Patients (n = 409) who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were assigned to the non-UR (R and BR classes combined; n = 285) and UR-HCC classes (n = 68; training cohort). Patient characteristics in the BR-HCC and R-HCC groups were compared. The new criteria were tested in a validation cohort (n = 295).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 285 patients, 229 and 56 were classified into the R- and BR-HCC classes, respectively, using macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and future liver remnant/modified albumin-bilirubin scores. Patients with BR-HCC demonstrated significantly worse progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than patients with R-HCC in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis of the non-UR-HCC group in the training cohort revealed that the tumor number and BR-HCC were independent predictive factors for poor overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This classification can help select patients with BR-HCC for preoperative treatment before considering surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Some patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new resectability classification for patients with HCC.
Methods: We classified patients into three categories: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). Patients (n = 409) who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were assigned to the non-UR (R and BR classes combined; n = 285) and UR-HCC classes (n = 68; training cohort). Patient characteristics in the BR-HCC and R-HCC groups were compared. The new criteria were tested in a validation cohort (n = 295).
Results: Of the 285 patients, 229 and 56 were classified into the R- and BR-HCC classes, respectively, using macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and future liver remnant/modified albumin-bilirubin scores. Patients with BR-HCC demonstrated significantly worse progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than patients with R-HCC in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis of the non-UR-HCC group in the training cohort revealed that the tumor number and BR-HCC were independent predictive factors for poor overall survival.
Conclusions: This classification can help select patients with BR-HCC for preoperative treatment before considering surgery.
期刊介绍:
Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.