The effect of embryo migration after embryo transfer with fresh oocyte donation cycles on pregnancy outcomes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human Fertility Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2024.2406338
Berk Angun, Turkan Gursu, Hale Goksever Celik, Alper Eraslan, John Yeh, Ercan Bastu
{"title":"The effect of embryo migration after embryo transfer with fresh oocyte donation cycles on pregnancy outcomes.","authors":"Berk Angun, Turkan Gursu, Hale Goksever Celik, Alper Eraslan, John Yeh, Ercan Bastu","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2024.2406338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Embryo migration is defined as the movement of embryos to implant at the exact site in the endometrial cavity during assisted reproductive technology (ART). We aimed to evaluate the impact of embryo migration on clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) in fresh oocyte donation (OD) cycles. A total of 611 fresh OD cycles was recruited in this prospective cohort study. All embryos were expulsed to upper-middle uterus between 10 and 20 mm from the fundus. Air bubble-fundus distance was measured using ultrasound (USG) at the time of embryo transfer (ET) and then 60 minutes after ET. Patients were divided into 3 groups; first group consisted of patients whose embryos migrated towards fundus, second group whose embryos remained between 10 and 20 mm from fundus and the third group including embryos which migrated towards cervix. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding CPR and LBR (<i>p</i> = 0.359 and <i>p</i> = 0.865, respectively). Our study revealed that embryo migration was a fact and almost 22% of embryos migrated towards the fundus or the cervix. On the other hand, whether the embryo stayed static or migrated, CPR and LBR did not differ significantly in fresh OD cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2406338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Embryo migration is defined as the movement of embryos to implant at the exact site in the endometrial cavity during assisted reproductive technology (ART). We aimed to evaluate the impact of embryo migration on clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) in fresh oocyte donation (OD) cycles. A total of 611 fresh OD cycles was recruited in this prospective cohort study. All embryos were expulsed to upper-middle uterus between 10 and 20 mm from the fundus. Air bubble-fundus distance was measured using ultrasound (USG) at the time of embryo transfer (ET) and then 60 minutes after ET. Patients were divided into 3 groups; first group consisted of patients whose embryos migrated towards fundus, second group whose embryos remained between 10 and 20 mm from fundus and the third group including embryos which migrated towards cervix. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding CPR and LBR (p = 0.359 and p = 0.865, respectively). Our study revealed that embryo migration was a fact and almost 22% of embryos migrated towards the fundus or the cervix. On the other hand, whether the embryo stayed static or migrated, CPR and LBR did not differ significantly in fresh OD cycles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新鲜卵母细胞捐赠周期胚胎移植后胚胎迁移对妊娠结果的影响。
胚胎迁移是指在辅助生殖技术(ART)过程中,胚胎移动到子宫内膜腔的准确位置着床。我们旨在评估胚胎迁移对新鲜卵母细胞捐献(OD)周期中临床妊娠(CPR)和活产率(LBR)的影响。这项前瞻性队列研究共招募了 611 个新鲜 OD 周期。所有胚胎都被排出到距离宫底 10 到 20 毫米之间的子宫中上部。在胚胎移植(ET)时和 ET 后 60 分钟,使用超声波(USG)测量气泡与宫底的距离。患者被分为三组:第一组是胚胎移向宫底的患者,第二组是胚胎距离宫底10至20毫米的患者,第三组包括胚胎移向宫颈的患者。各组在 CPR 和 LBR 方面无明显差异(分别为 p = 0.359 和 p = 0.865)。我们的研究表明,胚胎迁移是一个事实,近 22% 的胚胎迁移至宫底或宫颈。另一方面,无论胚胎保持静止还是迁移,CPR 和 LBR 在新鲜 OD 周期中都没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
期刊最新文献
Do sperm and lubricants gel well with each other? A systematic review. Best practice recommendations for medically assisted reproduction in patients with known cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Effect of paternal body mass index on maternal and child-health outcomes of singletons after frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective study. Evidence based management of patients with endometriosis undergoing assisted conception: British fertility society policy and practice recommendations. Characterising umbilical abdominal wall endometriosis as a distinct subgroup of abdominal wall endometriosis - retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1