Main Coronary Flow Calculation With the Assistance of Physiological Side Branch Flow.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1109/TBME.2024.3469289
Anbang Wang, Heye Zhang, Baihong Xie, Zhifan Gao, Yong Dong, Changnong Peng, Xiujian Liu
{"title":"Main Coronary Flow Calculation With the Assistance of Physiological Side Branch Flow.","authors":"Anbang Wang, Heye Zhang, Baihong Xie, Zhifan Gao, Yong Dong, Changnong Peng, Xiujian Liu","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2024.3469289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary angiography, referred to as ICA-FFR, is a less-invasive alternative for invasive FFR measurement based on computational fluid dynamics. Blood flow into side branches influences the accuracy of ICA-FFR. However, properly compensating for side branch flow in ICAFFR analysis is challenging. In this study, we proposed a physiological side branch flow model to comprehensively compensate side branch flow for ICA-FFR analysis with no need for reconstructing side branch geometry.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>the physiological side branch flow model employed a reduced-order model to calculate the pressure distribution in vessel segments. The main coronary artery (without side branches) was delineated and divided based on bifurcation nodes. The model compensates for flow to invisible side branches within each segment and flow to visible side branches at each bifurcation node. Lastly, ICA-FFR based on physiological side branch flow model (ICA-FFRPSBF) was calculated from a single angiographic view. Functional stenosis is defined by FFR ≤ 0.80.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Our study involved 223 vessels from 172 patients. Using invasive FFR as a reference, the Pearson correlation coefficient of ICAFFRPSBF was 0.93. ICA-FFRPSBF showed a high AUC (AUC = 0.96) and accuracy (91.9%) in predicting functional stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed model accurately compensates for flow to side branches without their geometry in ICA-FFR analysis. ICA-FFR analysis exhibits high feasibility and diagnostic performance in identifying functional stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2024.3469289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary angiography, referred to as ICA-FFR, is a less-invasive alternative for invasive FFR measurement based on computational fluid dynamics. Blood flow into side branches influences the accuracy of ICA-FFR. However, properly compensating for side branch flow in ICAFFR analysis is challenging. In this study, we proposed a physiological side branch flow model to comprehensively compensate side branch flow for ICA-FFR analysis with no need for reconstructing side branch geometry.

Methodology: the physiological side branch flow model employed a reduced-order model to calculate the pressure distribution in vessel segments. The main coronary artery (without side branches) was delineated and divided based on bifurcation nodes. The model compensates for flow to invisible side branches within each segment and flow to visible side branches at each bifurcation node. Lastly, ICA-FFR based on physiological side branch flow model (ICA-FFRPSBF) was calculated from a single angiographic view. Functional stenosis is defined by FFR ≤ 0.80.

Result: Our study involved 223 vessels from 172 patients. Using invasive FFR as a reference, the Pearson correlation coefficient of ICAFFRPSBF was 0.93. ICA-FFRPSBF showed a high AUC (AUC = 0.96) and accuracy (91.9%) in predicting functional stenosis.

Conclusion: The proposed model accurately compensates for flow to side branches without their geometry in ICA-FFR analysis. ICA-FFR analysis exhibits high feasibility and diagnostic performance in identifying functional stenosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用生理侧支血流计算主冠脉血流
目的:由冠状动脉造影得出的分数血流储备(FFR)被称为 ICA-FFR,它是基于计算流体动力学的有创 FFR 测量的一种微创替代方法。侧支血流会影响 ICA-FFR 的准确性。然而,在 ICAFFR 分析中适当补偿侧支血流具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种生理侧支血流模型,无需重建侧支几何形状,即可在 ICA-FFR 分析中全面补偿侧支血流。根据分叉节点对冠状动脉主干(无侧支)进行划定和划分。该模型补偿了每个管段内不可见侧支的流量以及每个分叉节点处可见侧支的流量。最后,基于生理侧支血流模型(ICA-FFRPSBF)的 ICA-FFR 是通过单个血管造影视图计算得出的。功能性狭窄的定义是 FFR ≤ 0.80:我们的研究涉及 172 名患者的 223 条血管。以有创 FFR 为参照,ICA-FFRPSBF 的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.93。在预测功能性血管狭窄方面,ICA-FFRPSBF 显示出较高的 AUC(AUC = 0.96)和准确性(91.9%):结论:在 ICA-FFR 分析中,所提出的模型能准确补偿侧支血流,而无需考虑其几何形状。ICA-FFR分析在识别功能性狭窄方面具有很高的可行性和诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Front Cover IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Handling Editors Information IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Information IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1