Household Food Insecurity among Indigenous Communities in Sarawak, Malaysia: Predictors and Coping Strategies.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Indian journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.4103/ijph.ijph_545_23
Wan Jool Teoh, Leh Shii Law, Hazmi Helmy, Jeffery Anak Stephen, Whye Lian Cheah, Yolanda Anak Salleh
{"title":"Household Food Insecurity among Indigenous Communities in Sarawak, Malaysia: Predictors and Coping Strategies.","authors":"Wan Jool Teoh, Leh Shii Law, Hazmi Helmy, Jeffery Anak Stephen, Whye Lian Cheah, Yolanda Anak Salleh","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_545_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food insecurity prevails in people at all phases of their life course and causes remarkable health, social, and financial repercussions. In Sarawak state, Malaysia, information regarding household food insecurity is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of household food insecurity, together with its predictors and coping strategies among the Sarawak indigenous communities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among 953 Indigenous households (women) located in six districts throughout Sarawak using multistage sampling. Interviewer-administrated questionnaires were used. Simple and multiple logistic regressions were employed to draw inferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of food insecurity was 42.2%. Large household size (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =1.57 [1.04-2.45]), hardcore poor (AOR = 12.26 [5.07-29.65]), and absolute poor families (AOR = 3.01 [1.76-5.15]), recipient of financial assistance (AOR = 1.94 [1.27, 2.96]), no savings (AOR = 1.63 [1.08-2.46]), increased resource loss (AOR = 1.004 [1.001-1.008]), and employment of coping strategies (AOR = 3.78 [2.50-5.72]) were significantly related to a higher risk of household food insecurity. High level of perceived social support (AOR = 0.73 [0.58-0.93]), optimism (AOR = 0.91 [0.86-0.96]), and general perceived self-efficacy (AOR = 0.88 [0.85-0.91]) among respondents were protective against household food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly half of the Indigenous households faced food insecurity in the current study. The findings suggest that incessant effort by pertinent stakeholders is warranted via diverse strategies to enhance the socioeconomic status and nutrition intervention programs that incorporate components of perceived social support, optimism, and perceived general self-efficacy to mitigate the level of food insecurity among the Sarawak Indigenous communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":"68 3","pages":"380-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_545_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Food insecurity prevails in people at all phases of their life course and causes remarkable health, social, and financial repercussions. In Sarawak state, Malaysia, information regarding household food insecurity is limited.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of household food insecurity, together with its predictors and coping strategies among the Sarawak indigenous communities.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 953 Indigenous households (women) located in six districts throughout Sarawak using multistage sampling. Interviewer-administrated questionnaires were used. Simple and multiple logistic regressions were employed to draw inferences.

Results: The prevalence of food insecurity was 42.2%. Large household size (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =1.57 [1.04-2.45]), hardcore poor (AOR = 12.26 [5.07-29.65]), and absolute poor families (AOR = 3.01 [1.76-5.15]), recipient of financial assistance (AOR = 1.94 [1.27, 2.96]), no savings (AOR = 1.63 [1.08-2.46]), increased resource loss (AOR = 1.004 [1.001-1.008]), and employment of coping strategies (AOR = 3.78 [2.50-5.72]) were significantly related to a higher risk of household food insecurity. High level of perceived social support (AOR = 0.73 [0.58-0.93]), optimism (AOR = 0.91 [0.86-0.96]), and general perceived self-efficacy (AOR = 0.88 [0.85-0.91]) among respondents were protective against household food insecurity.

Conclusion: Nearly half of the Indigenous households faced food insecurity in the current study. The findings suggest that incessant effort by pertinent stakeholders is warranted via diverse strategies to enhance the socioeconomic status and nutrition intervention programs that incorporate components of perceived social support, optimism, and perceived general self-efficacy to mitigate the level of food insecurity among the Sarawak Indigenous communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚沙捞越土著社区的家庭粮食不安全问题:预测因素与应对策略
背景:人们在一生中的各个阶段都会面临粮食不安全问题,并对健康、社会和经济造成严重影响。在马来西亚沙捞越州,有关家庭粮食不安全的信息十分有限:本研究的目的是调查沙捞越土著社区中家庭粮食不安全的普遍程度及其预测因素和应对策略:这项横断面研究采用多阶段抽样法,对沙捞越六个地区的 953 户原住民家庭(妇女)进行了调查。采用了由受访者填写的调查问卷。采用简单和多重逻辑回归进行推断:结果:粮食不安全的发生率为 42.2%。大户型家庭(调整后的几率比 [AOR] =1.57 [1.04-2.45])、核心贫困家庭(AOR = 12.26 [5.07-29.65])和绝对贫困家庭(AOR = 3.01 [1.76-5.15])、接受财政援助的家庭(AOR = 1.94 [1.27, 2.96])、无储蓄(AOR = 1.63 [1.08-2.46])、资源损失增加(AOR = 1.004 [1.001-1.008])和采用应对策略(AOR = 3.78 [2.50-5.72])与家庭粮食不安全风险较高有显著关系。受访者的高水平社会支持感知(AOR = 0.73 [0.58-0.93])、乐观感知(AOR = 0.91 [0.86-0.96])和一般自我效能感知(AOR = 0.88 [0.85-0.91])对家庭粮食不安全具有保护作用:结论:在本次研究中,近一半的土著家庭面临粮食不安全问题。研究结果表明,相关利益方应通过各种策略不断努力,提高社会经济地位,并实施营养干预计划,将感知到的社会支持、乐观情绪和感知到的一般自我效能等因素结合起来,以减轻沙捞越土著社区的粮食不安全程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of public health
Indian journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.
期刊最新文献
Severe Pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus Coinfection in Infants with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Social and Cultural Influences on Genetic Counseling Acceptability: A Mixed-Methods Study on Beta-Thalassemia Carriers Among Graduate Students in West Bengal, India. Time to Revisit COTPA as Herbs Become Perilous. Training Needs Assessment Should Be Introduced as a Competency for Postgraduate Training in Community Medicine in India. "Fit India Movement" Promotes WHO's Physical Activity Recommendations: Some Issues to Consider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1