Construction of indicators for evaluating the quality of extended care for children with asthma.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2024.2408645
Chang Liu, Zefang Chen, Lin Mo
{"title":"Construction of indicators for evaluating the quality of extended care for children with asthma.","authors":"Chang Liu, Zefang Chen, Lin Mo","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2024.2408645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>To construct a set of scientific and effective quality evaluation indicators of continuing care for children with asthma, and to promote the development of continuing care for children with asthma toward a more specialized and standardized direction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through literature research and semi-structured interview, the item pool of evaluation index was drawn up, and the first draft of expert inquiry questionnaire was formed based on the three-dimensional quality theoretical model of structure-process-result, and the construction of quality evaluation index was completed through two rounds of expert inquiry and analytic hierarchy process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective recovery rate was 94.44% in the first round and 100.00% in the second round, the expert authority coefficient was 0.852 and 0.863, and the Kendal coordination coefficient was 0.129 and 0.126, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Finally, the evaluation index of continuing care quality for children with asthma was formed, including 3 first-level indicators, 9 s-level indicators and 36 third-level indicators, and then the weight and combination weight of each index were obtained by AHP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evaluation index of continuing care quality for children with asthma is scientific and specific, which is of great significance to the improvement of continuing care quality for children with asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"427-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2024.2408645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: To construct a set of scientific and effective quality evaluation indicators of continuing care for children with asthma, and to promote the development of continuing care for children with asthma toward a more specialized and standardized direction.

Methods: Through literature research and semi-structured interview, the item pool of evaluation index was drawn up, and the first draft of expert inquiry questionnaire was formed based on the three-dimensional quality theoretical model of structure-process-result, and the construction of quality evaluation index was completed through two rounds of expert inquiry and analytic hierarchy process.

Results: The effective recovery rate was 94.44% in the first round and 100.00% in the second round, the expert authority coefficient was 0.852 and 0.863, and the Kendal coordination coefficient was 0.129 and 0.126, respectively (p < 0.01). Finally, the evaluation index of continuing care quality for children with asthma was formed, including 3 first-level indicators, 9 s-level indicators and 36 third-level indicators, and then the weight and combination weight of each index were obtained by AHP.

Conclusions: The evaluation index of continuing care quality for children with asthma is scientific and specific, which is of great significance to the improvement of continuing care quality for children with asthma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建评估哮喘儿童延伸护理质量的指标。
背景与目的构建一套科学有效的哮喘儿童持续护理质量评价指标,促进哮喘儿童持续护理向更加专业化、规范化的方向发展:方法:通过文献研究和半结构式访谈,建立评价指标项目库,基于结构-过程-结果的三维质量理论模型,形成专家问询问卷初稿,通过两轮专家问询和层次分析法,完成质量评价指标的构建:结果:第一轮有效康复率为 94.44%,第二轮有效康复率为 100.00%,专家权威系数分别为 0.852 和 0.863,Kendal 协调系数分别为 0.129 和 0.126(P < 0.01)。最后形成哮喘患儿延续护理质量评价指标,包括3个一级指标、9个二级指标和36个三级指标,再通过AHP求得各指标的权重和组合权重:哮喘患儿持续护理质量评价指标具有科学性和针对性,对提高哮喘患儿持续护理质量具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
期刊最新文献
Dried fruit, acetate, and asthma: a mediation Mendelian randomization analysis. Causal effects of pediatric asthma on psychiatric disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Construction of indicators for evaluating the quality of extended care for children with asthma. Efficacy of medical education combined with extended care on adherence to inhaled glucocorticoids and clinical effects in patients with bronchial asthma. Emotion regulation among adults with asthma: Links with short-acting inhaler medication overuse and utilization of acute medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1