Immediate and One-Year Outcomes of an Asthma-Tailored Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme in Overweight and Obese People with Difficult-to-Treat Asthma.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2024-09-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S466894
Helen Clare Ricketts, Varun Sharma, Femke Steffensen, Elaine Mackay, Gordon Wallace MacDonald, Duncan S Buchan, Michael Lean, Rekha Chaudhuri, Douglas C Cowan
{"title":"Immediate and One-Year Outcomes of an Asthma-Tailored Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme in Overweight and Obese People with Difficult-to-Treat Asthma.","authors":"Helen Clare Ricketts, Varun Sharma, Femke Steffensen, Elaine Mackay, Gordon Wallace MacDonald, Duncan S Buchan, Michael Lean, Rekha Chaudhuri, Douglas C Cowan","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S466894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Management of difficult-to-treat asthma is particularly challenging in people with elevated body mass index (BMI). Our randomised controlled trial of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) showed improved outcomes at 8 weeks. Here we assess immediate and one-year effects of asthma-tailored PR in participants with difficult-to-treat asthma and BMI ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and identify response predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study of PR, tailored to asthma, comparing outcomes at baseline (V1), immediately after 8 weeks of PR (V2), and at 1 year (V3). Baseline characteristics were compared in responders/non-responders defined by achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for asthma control questionnaire (ACQ6) (0.5) at 8 weeks and 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 92 participants, 56 attended V2 and 45 attended V3. Mean age was 60 (SD 13) years, 60% were female, and median (IQR) BMI was 33.8 (29.5-38.7) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. At V1, V2, and V3, respectively, there were significant differences in ACQ6 (mean (95% CI): 2.5 (2.1-2.9), 2.2 (1.8-2.5), and 2.3 (1.9-2.7), <i>p</i><0.003), Borg breathlessness score post-6-minute walk test (median (IQR): 2 (0.5-3), 1 (0-2), and 1 (0.5-2), <i>p</i><0.035), and annualised exacerbations requiring prednisolone (median (IQR): 3 (2-5), 0 (0-4.7), and 1.5 (0-4.2), <i>p</i><0.003). A total of 27/56 (48%) had improvements >MCID for ACQ6 at V2 and 16 (33%) at V3. Participants with higher ACQ6 scores at baseline (suggesting poorer asthma control) were more likely to achieve MCID. Baseline BMI, within the range studied, was not predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation induced improvements in asthma-related outcomes including perception of breathlessness, asthma control, and exacerbation frequency at 1 year. Those with poorer baseline asthma control were more likely to benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"911-928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S466894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Management of difficult-to-treat asthma is particularly challenging in people with elevated body mass index (BMI). Our randomised controlled trial of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) showed improved outcomes at 8 weeks. Here we assess immediate and one-year effects of asthma-tailored PR in participants with difficult-to-treat asthma and BMI ≥25 kg/m2, and identify response predictors.

Methods: A prospective observational study of PR, tailored to asthma, comparing outcomes at baseline (V1), immediately after 8 weeks of PR (V2), and at 1 year (V3). Baseline characteristics were compared in responders/non-responders defined by achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for asthma control questionnaire (ACQ6) (0.5) at 8 weeks and 1 year.

Results: Of 92 participants, 56 attended V2 and 45 attended V3. Mean age was 60 (SD 13) years, 60% were female, and median (IQR) BMI was 33.8 (29.5-38.7) kg/m2. At V1, V2, and V3, respectively, there were significant differences in ACQ6 (mean (95% CI): 2.5 (2.1-2.9), 2.2 (1.8-2.5), and 2.3 (1.9-2.7), p<0.003), Borg breathlessness score post-6-minute walk test (median (IQR): 2 (0.5-3), 1 (0-2), and 1 (0.5-2), p<0.035), and annualised exacerbations requiring prednisolone (median (IQR): 3 (2-5), 0 (0-4.7), and 1.5 (0-4.2), p<0.003). A total of 27/56 (48%) had improvements >MCID for ACQ6 at V2 and 16 (33%) at V3. Participants with higher ACQ6 scores at baseline (suggesting poorer asthma control) were more likely to achieve MCID. Baseline BMI, within the range studied, was not predictive.

Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation induced improvements in asthma-related outcomes including perception of breathlessness, asthma control, and exacerbation frequency at 1 year. Those with poorer baseline asthma control were more likely to benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对难以治疗的超重和肥胖哮喘患者的哮喘定制肺康复计划的近期和一年期疗效。
导言:对于体重指数(BMI)升高的患者来说,管理难以治疗的哮喘尤其具有挑战性。我们的肺康复(PR)随机对照试验显示,8 周后疗效有所改善。在此,我们对哮喘难以治愈且体重指数≥25 kg/m2的参与者进行了哮喘量身定制的肺康复治疗的即时效果和一年效果评估,并确定了反应预测因素:针对哮喘定制的 PR 的前瞻性观察研究,比较基线(V1)、PR 8 周后(V2)和 1 年后(V3)的结果。比较了有反应者和无反应者的基线特征,有反应者的定义是在 8 周和 1 年时哮喘控制问卷 (ACQ6) 达到最小临床意义差异 (MCID)(0.5):92 名参与者中,56 人参加了 V2,45 人参加了 V3。平均年龄为 60 (SD 13) 岁,60% 为女性,体重指数中位数 (IQR) 为 33.8 (29.5-38.7) kg/m2。在 V1、V2 和 V3,ACQ6 分别有显著差异(平均值(95% CI):2.5 (2.1-2.9)、2.2 (1.8-2.5) 和 2.3 (1.9-2.7),V2 的 ACQ6 为 pppMCID,V3 为 16 (33%)。基线 ACQ6 分数较高的参与者(表明哮喘控制较差)更有可能达到 MCID。在研究范围内,基线体重指数(BMI)并不具有预测性:结论:肺康复治疗可改善哮喘相关结果,包括呼吸困难感、哮喘控制和1年后的哮喘加重频率。基线哮喘控制较差的患者更有可能从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
期刊最新文献
Disease Modification in Asthma: Are We on the Right Way? A Multidisciplinary Expert Delphi Consensus (MODIASTHMA Consensus). Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma Identified as Responders to Omalizumab Treatment at 2 Years Based on the GETE Score Continued Treatment for an Extended Period. Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO). Benralizumab: Effectiveness in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma at 6 and 12 Months at a Third-Level Care Hospital. Capacity for ICS-LABA Therapy Reduction. Response to Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1