A Retrospective Comparative Study of the Frequency of Hypotension in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization under General Anesthesia: Remimazolam versus Sevoflurane.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.038
Tatsuhiko Shimizu, Tomoyuki Kanazawa, Tsubasa Yoshida, Takanobu Sakura, Kazuyoshi Shimizu, Tatsuo Iwasaki, Hiroshi Morimatsu
{"title":"A Retrospective Comparative Study of the Frequency of Hypotension in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization under General Anesthesia: Remimazolam versus Sevoflurane.","authors":"Tatsuhiko Shimizu, Tomoyuki Kanazawa, Tsubasa Yoshida, Takanobu Sakura, Kazuyoshi Shimizu, Tatsuo Iwasaki, Hiroshi Morimatsu","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of hypotension between remimazolam and sevoflurane under general anesthesia for cardiac catheterization in patients with congenital heart disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single university hospital with 300 pediatric cardiac catheterizations by general anesthesia performed annually.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients younger than 15 years who underwent cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia between March 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Exclusion criteria were general anesthesia maintained with other than remimazolam or sevoflurane, receipt of remifentanil, American Society of Anesthesiologists score 4 or 5, emergency procedures, and no direct arterial pressure measurement.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>General anesthesia was maintained with remimazolam or sevoflurane.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 309 patients were analyzed, including 28 in the remimazolam group and 281 in the sevoflurane group. Propensity score matching adjusted for confounding factors resulted in 28 patients in each arm, with no apparent differences in background factors. Hypotension was defined as a time-averaged area > 1, in which systolic arterial pressure fell below 80% of the baseline from the start of anesthesia to the end of procedure. The significance level was set at P < .05. The incidence of hypotension was 39.3% in the remimazolam arm and 46.4% in the sevoflurane arm, with no significant difference (P = .79), although the ratio of the median systolic arterial pressure to the baseline value was significantly higher in the remimazolam arm (91.4 ± 15.2% vs 83.2 ± 11.4% in the sevoflurane arm; P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam was not associated with a lower incidence of hypotension compared to sevoflurane during pediatric cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease while maintaining significantly higher blood pressure overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the incidence of hypotension between remimazolam and sevoflurane under general anesthesia for cardiac catheterization in patients with congenital heart disease.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: A single university hospital with 300 pediatric cardiac catheterizations by general anesthesia performed annually.

Participants: Patients younger than 15 years who underwent cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia between March 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Exclusion criteria were general anesthesia maintained with other than remimazolam or sevoflurane, receipt of remifentanil, American Society of Anesthesiologists score 4 or 5, emergency procedures, and no direct arterial pressure measurement.

Interventions: General anesthesia was maintained with remimazolam or sevoflurane.

Measurements and main results: A total of 309 patients were analyzed, including 28 in the remimazolam group and 281 in the sevoflurane group. Propensity score matching adjusted for confounding factors resulted in 28 patients in each arm, with no apparent differences in background factors. Hypotension was defined as a time-averaged area > 1, in which systolic arterial pressure fell below 80% of the baseline from the start of anesthesia to the end of procedure. The significance level was set at P < .05. The incidence of hypotension was 39.3% in the remimazolam arm and 46.4% in the sevoflurane arm, with no significant difference (P = .79), although the ratio of the median systolic arterial pressure to the baseline value was significantly higher in the remimazolam arm (91.4 ± 15.2% vs 83.2 ± 11.4% in the sevoflurane arm; P = .03).

Conclusions: Remimazolam was not associated with a lower incidence of hypotension compared to sevoflurane during pediatric cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease while maintaining significantly higher blood pressure overall.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于全身麻醉下小儿心脏导管术中低血压发生频率的回顾性比较研究:雷马唑仑与七氟醚的对比研究
目的比较在对先天性心脏病患者进行心导管检查的全身麻醉中,瑞马唑仑和七氟醚的低血压发生率:设计:回顾性观察研究:一家大学医院,每年进行300例全身麻醉下的小儿心导管检查:2021年3月1日至2022年12月31日期间在全身麻醉下接受心导管检查的15岁以下患者。排除标准:使用瑞马唑仑或七氟醚以外的药物维持全身麻醉、使用瑞芬太尼、美国麻醉医师协会评分 4 分或 5 分、急诊手术以及未进行直接动脉压测量:干预措施:使用瑞马唑仑或七氟醚维持全身麻醉:共对309名患者进行了分析,其中包括28名瑞马唑仑组患者和281名七氟醚组患者。根据混杂因素进行倾向评分匹配后,两组各有 28 名患者,背景因素无明显差异。低血压定义为时间平均面积大于 1,即从麻醉开始到手术结束,收缩压低于基线的 80%。显著性水平设定为 P <.05。低血压发生率在雷马唑仑组和七氟醚组分别为39.3%和46.4%,无显著差异(P = .79),但雷马唑仑组收缩压中位数与基线值的比值显著更高(91.4 ± 15.2% vs 83.2 ± 11.4%;P = .03):结论:与七氟烷相比,雷马唑仑在小儿先天性心脏病心导管术中的低血压发生率并不低,但总体血压却明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Contents Editorial Board 41st Symposium in Barbados brochure Articles to Appear in Future Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1