{"title":"A prospective study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in staging of non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Qinfen Wang, Zhensheng Deng, Chuangang Lu, Lijun Chen, Jiangjun Qin, Ping Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00432-024-05953-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the value of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-isonitrile deoxyglucosamine (CNDG) SPECT/CT in the staging and resectability diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was approved by the hospital ethics review committee. Sixty-three patients with NSCLC received <sup>99m</sup>Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT, CECT and initial TNM staging before treatment. Thirty-three patients who underwent radical surgery underwent postoperative pathological TNM staging as the reference standard. Another thirty patients underwent radiochemotherapy; among them, the reference standard of 7 patients of N staging and 5 patients of M staging was based on biopsy pathology, and the diagnosis of the remaining lesions was confirmed by at least one different image or clinical imaging follow-up for more than 3 months. The McNemar test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of staging and resectability of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT and CECT in NSCLC, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all patients and surgical patients, the accuracies of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the T stage and N stage were higher than those of CECT (all patients: 90.5%, 88.9% vs. 79.4%, 60.3%; surgical patients: 81.8%, 78.8% vs. 60.6%, 51.5%), and the differences were statistically significant (all patients: T stage, P = 0.016; N stage, P = 0.000; surgical patients: T stage, P = 0.016; N stage, P = 0.004). For all patients, the accuracy of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the M stage was higher than that of CECT (96.8% vs. 90.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.289). ROC curve analysis showed that the accuracy of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the potential resectability of NSCLC was significantly better than that of CECT (P = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary clinical study shows that <sup>99m</sup>Tc-CNDG SPECT/CT is of great value for accurate clinical staging of NSCLC compared with CECT and can significantly improve the accuracy of resectability diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"150 9","pages":"430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05953-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the value of 99mTc-isonitrile deoxyglucosamine (CNDG) SPECT/CT in the staging and resectability diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).
Methods: This research was approved by the hospital ethics review committee. Sixty-three patients with NSCLC received 99mTc-CNDG SPECT/CT, CECT and initial TNM staging before treatment. Thirty-three patients who underwent radical surgery underwent postoperative pathological TNM staging as the reference standard. Another thirty patients underwent radiochemotherapy; among them, the reference standard of 7 patients of N staging and 5 patients of M staging was based on biopsy pathology, and the diagnosis of the remaining lesions was confirmed by at least one different image or clinical imaging follow-up for more than 3 months. The McNemar test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of staging and resectability of 99mTc-CNDG SPECT/CT and CECT in NSCLC, respectively.
Results: For all patients and surgical patients, the accuracies of 99mTc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the T stage and N stage were higher than those of CECT (all patients: 90.5%, 88.9% vs. 79.4%, 60.3%; surgical patients: 81.8%, 78.8% vs. 60.6%, 51.5%), and the differences were statistically significant (all patients: T stage, P = 0.016; N stage, P = 0.000; surgical patients: T stage, P = 0.016; N stage, P = 0.004). For all patients, the accuracy of 99mTc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the M stage was higher than that of CECT (96.8% vs. 90.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.289). ROC curve analysis showed that the accuracy of 99mTc-CNDG SPECT/CT in diagnosing the potential resectability of NSCLC was significantly better than that of CECT (P = 0.046).
Conclusion: This preliminary clinical study shows that 99mTc-CNDG SPECT/CT is of great value for accurate clinical staging of NSCLC compared with CECT and can significantly improve the accuracy of resectability diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses.
The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.