The exponential growth of nonsurgeons performing fusions for low-back pain.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311
Abraham Dada, Cecilia Dalle Ore, Praveen V Mummaneni, Arati Patel, Vardhaan Ambati, Katie O Orrico, Luis M Tumialán, Joseph S Cheng, John J Knightly, Anthony M DiGiorgio
{"title":"The exponential growth of nonsurgeons performing fusions for low-back pain.","authors":"Abraham Dada, Cecilia Dalle Ore, Praveen V Mummaneni, Arati Patel, Vardhaan Ambati, Katie O Orrico, Luis M Tumialán, Joseph S Cheng, John J Knightly, Anthony M DiGiorgio","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to report changes in utilization and payment trends of low-back pain (LBP) interventions and the impact of nonsurgeon interventionalists on these changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare Part B national summary data files were used to gather annual utilization and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data for LBP interventions from 2000 to 2021. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes were grouped as decompression, spinal fusion, sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), physical therapy (PT), and chiropractic manipulation (Chiro). The total allowed services and payments were collected for each HCPCS group. CMS provider-level files, available from 2013 to 2021, were used to collect neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, and nonsurgeon interventionalist (interventional radiology and pain management) data for each surgical HCPCS code group (decompression, spinal fusion, and SI joint fusion). The United States Consumer Price Index was used to adjust for inflation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2000 to 2021, there were 339,720,725 Medicare-approved interventions and payments of approximately $21 billion for LBP (percentage of cumulative payments: 41.8% Chiro, 16.5% ESI, 14.4% spinal fusion, 14.3% PT, 10.2% decompression, and 0.4% SI joint fusion). In a subgroup analysis, spinal fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (59.2%), neurosurgeons (40.6%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (< 1%) from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon fusion utilization each grew by < 3% and associated Medicare payments to each specialty declined by 1% each year. During the same period, nonsurgeon interventionalist utilization grew 26% each year and associated Medicare payments to nonsurgeon interventionalists for spine fusions grew 62% each year. In a subgroup analysis, SI joint fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (50.7%), neurosurgeons (24.8%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (24.5%) from 2018 to 2021. Neurosurgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined by 1% each year and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 2% each year. Orthopedic surgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined 1% and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 4% each year. Nonsurgeon interventionalist use of SI joint fusions grew 415% and payments grew 435% each year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The substantial growth in Medicare payments for surgical LBP interventions is disproportionally driven by nonsurgeon interventionalists. The exponential growth of nonsurgeon interventionalists performing spinal fusion surgeries, particularly SI joint fusions, largely accounts for the significant increase in Medicare expenditures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to report changes in utilization and payment trends of low-back pain (LBP) interventions and the impact of nonsurgeon interventionalists on these changes.

Methods: Medicare Part B national summary data files were used to gather annual utilization and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data for LBP interventions from 2000 to 2021. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes were grouped as decompression, spinal fusion, sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), physical therapy (PT), and chiropractic manipulation (Chiro). The total allowed services and payments were collected for each HCPCS group. CMS provider-level files, available from 2013 to 2021, were used to collect neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, and nonsurgeon interventionalist (interventional radiology and pain management) data for each surgical HCPCS code group (decompression, spinal fusion, and SI joint fusion). The United States Consumer Price Index was used to adjust for inflation.

Results: From 2000 to 2021, there were 339,720,725 Medicare-approved interventions and payments of approximately $21 billion for LBP (percentage of cumulative payments: 41.8% Chiro, 16.5% ESI, 14.4% spinal fusion, 14.3% PT, 10.2% decompression, and 0.4% SI joint fusion). In a subgroup analysis, spinal fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (59.2%), neurosurgeons (40.6%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (< 1%) from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon fusion utilization each grew by < 3% and associated Medicare payments to each specialty declined by 1% each year. During the same period, nonsurgeon interventionalist utilization grew 26% each year and associated Medicare payments to nonsurgeon interventionalists for spine fusions grew 62% each year. In a subgroup analysis, SI joint fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (50.7%), neurosurgeons (24.8%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (24.5%) from 2018 to 2021. Neurosurgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined by 1% each year and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 2% each year. Orthopedic surgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined 1% and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 4% each year. Nonsurgeon interventionalist use of SI joint fusions grew 415% and payments grew 435% each year.

Conclusions: The substantial growth in Medicare payments for surgical LBP interventions is disproportionally driven by nonsurgeon interventionalists. The exponential growth of nonsurgeon interventionalists performing spinal fusion surgeries, particularly SI joint fusions, largely accounts for the significant increase in Medicare expenditures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非外科医生实施腰背痛融合术的人数呈指数级增长。
目的:本研究旨在报告腰背痛介入治疗的使用和支付趋势变化,以及非外科医生介入治疗对这些变化的影响:本研究旨在报告腰背痛(LBP)介入治疗的使用和支付趋势的变化,以及非外科医生介入治疗师对这些变化的影响:方法:使用联邦医疗保险 B 部分国家汇总数据文件收集 2000 年至 2021 年腰背痛介入治疗的年度使用情况和联邦医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的支付数据。医疗保健通用程序编码系统(HCPCS)代码被归类为减压、脊柱融合、骶髂关节(SI)融合、硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)、理疗(PT)和脊椎推拿(Chiro)。我们收集了每个 HCPCS 组的允许服务和支付总额。CMS 医疗服务提供者级别文件(2013 年至 2021 年)用于收集神经外科医生、整形外科医生和非外科医生介入医生(介入放射学和疼痛管理)在每个手术 HCPCS 代码组(减压、脊柱融合和 SI 关节融合)中的数据。使用美国消费者价格指数对通货膨胀进行调整:从 2000 年到 2021 年,共有 339720725 项医疗保险批准的干预措施和约 210 亿美元的腰椎间盘突出症支付费用(占累计支付费用的百分比:脊柱治疗占 41.8%,腰椎间盘突出症占 16.8%):41.8%的脊柱治疗、16.5%的ESI、14.4%的脊柱融合、14.3%的PT、10.2%的减压和0.4%的SI关节融合)。在一项分组分析中,从 2013 年到 2021 年,为医保患者实施脊柱融合术的分别是矫形外科医生(59.2%)、神经外科医生(40.6%)和非外科医生介入医生(< 1%)。从 2013 年到 2021 年,神经外科医生和矫形外科医生的融合术使用率增长均小于 3%,而每个专科的相关医疗保险支付额每年均下降 1%。同期,非外科医生介入治疗的使用率每年增长 26%,非外科医生介入治疗脊柱融合术的相关医疗保险支付额每年增长 62%。在一项分组分析中,从 2018 年到 2021 年,为医保患者实施 SI 关节融合术的分别是骨科医生(50.7%)、神经外科医生(24.8%)和非外科医生介入医师(24.5%)。神经外科医生对 SI 关节融合术的利用率每年下降 1%,而对该群体的相关医疗保险支付每年增长 2%。矫形外科医生对 SI 关节融合术的使用率每年下降 1%,而与此相关的医疗保险支付每年增长 4%。非外科医生介入治疗 SI 关节融合术的使用率每年增长 415%,支付的费用每年增长 435%:结论:医疗保险对腰椎间盘突出症外科干预的支付大幅增长主要是由非外科医生介入治疗师推动的。非外科介入医师脊柱融合手术(尤其是 SI 关节融合术)的指数式增长在很大程度上导致了医疗保险支出的大幅增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of 398 cases of intradural spinal tumor resection with primary dural closure: surgical outcomes based on the suture material. Safe, simple, and valid position for obtaining flexion-extension radiographs to assess instability in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: one specific instruction can make a difference. Improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with expandable cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity-matched cohort analysis. Risk factors for postoperative ileus after corrective spinal surgery: association with reduction in the retrocrural space area. Is multilevel MIS-TLIF with bilateral facetectomy a lordosing procedure? A retrospective cohort of 3-level MIS-TLIF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1