Quantitative assessment of postural stability in individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy compared with healthy controls.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-14 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.12.SPINE24970
Guanqing Li, Jingye Wu, Tenghui Ge, Jintao Ao, Zhongning Xu, Qingyun Li, Ronghui Cai, Shuquan Zhang, Yuqing Sun
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of postural stability in individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy compared with healthy controls.","authors":"Guanqing Li, Jingye Wu, Tenghui Ge, Jintao Ao, Zhongning Xu, Qingyun Li, Ronghui Cai, Shuquan Zhang, Yuqing Sun","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.SPINE24970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess postural stability using force plate center of pressure (COP) parameters in a large sample of Chinese patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), compare the results with healthy controls, and examine correlations between balance measures (COP parameters, brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test [Brief-BESTest] scores) and clinical assessments, including MRI findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study included 141 patients with DCM (diagnosed from June 2022 to May 2024) and 141 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Postural balance was assessed using COP parameters and Brief-BESTest scores. Clinical assessments included the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, 10-second grip and release test, 10-second step test, and Hoffman sign. MRI findings included the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the spinal cord at the most compressed level and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. COP parameters were compared between patients with DCM and controls, while correlations between COP parameters and Brief-BESTest scores and clinical/MRI findings were analyzed within the DCM cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with DCM had significantly greater COP values in path length, ellipse area, average velocity, and average acceleration compared with controls (all p < 0.001), indicating notable balance impairment. Brief-BESTest scores and COP parameters showed moderate to strong correlations with mJOA scores (ρ = 0.310-0.768) and varied significantly across mJOA severity levels (p < 0.01). Moderate correlations were observed between CSA and balance measures (ρ = 0.212-0.487), while increased signal intensity on MRI had limited impact. Both the grip and release and step tests also correlated moderately with balance measures (ρ = 0.245-0.640).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with DCM showed substantial balance impairment compared with healthy controls, with COP parameters and Brief-BESTest scores correlating well with mJOA scores, highlighting their utility in balance assessment. Moderate associations between CSA and balance suggest that structural MRI changes are relevant to postural stability in DCM. Future research could enhance balance assessment by integrating additional objective tools, such as motion analysis, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of DCM on postural control.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"551-560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.SPINE24970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess postural stability using force plate center of pressure (COP) parameters in a large sample of Chinese patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), compare the results with healthy controls, and examine correlations between balance measures (COP parameters, brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test [Brief-BESTest] scores) and clinical assessments, including MRI findings.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 141 patients with DCM (diagnosed from June 2022 to May 2024) and 141 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Postural balance was assessed using COP parameters and Brief-BESTest scores. Clinical assessments included the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, 10-second grip and release test, 10-second step test, and Hoffman sign. MRI findings included the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the spinal cord at the most compressed level and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. COP parameters were compared between patients with DCM and controls, while correlations between COP parameters and Brief-BESTest scores and clinical/MRI findings were analyzed within the DCM cohort.

Results: Patients with DCM had significantly greater COP values in path length, ellipse area, average velocity, and average acceleration compared with controls (all p < 0.001), indicating notable balance impairment. Brief-BESTest scores and COP parameters showed moderate to strong correlations with mJOA scores (ρ = 0.310-0.768) and varied significantly across mJOA severity levels (p < 0.01). Moderate correlations were observed between CSA and balance measures (ρ = 0.212-0.487), while increased signal intensity on MRI had limited impact. Both the grip and release and step tests also correlated moderately with balance measures (ρ = 0.245-0.640).

Conclusions: Patients with DCM showed substantial balance impairment compared with healthy controls, with COP parameters and Brief-BESTest scores correlating well with mJOA scores, highlighting their utility in balance assessment. Moderate associations between CSA and balance suggest that structural MRI changes are relevant to postural stability in DCM. Future research could enhance balance assessment by integrating additional objective tools, such as motion analysis, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of DCM on postural control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与健康对照相比,退行性脊髓型颈椎病患者体位稳定性的定量评估
目的:本研究的目的是利用压力中心(COP)参数定量评估中国大样本退行性颈椎病(DCM)患者的姿势稳定性,将结果与健康对照进行比较,并检查平衡测量(COP参数、简要平衡评估系统测试[brief - best]评分)与临床评估(包括MRI结果)之间的相关性。方法:这项横断面观察性研究包括141例DCM患者(诊断于2022年6月至2024年5月)和141例年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。使用COP参数和brief - best分数评估体位平衡。临床评估包括改良的日本骨科协会(mJOA)评分、10秒握放试验、10秒步动试验和Hoffman体征。MRI表现包括脊髓最压缩水平的横断面积(CSA)和t2加权图像上的信号强度增加。比较DCM患者和对照组的COP参数,并分析DCM队列中COP参数与brief - best评分和临床/MRI结果之间的相关性。结果:与对照组相比,DCM患者在路径长度、椭圆面积、平均速度和平均加速度方面的COP值显著增加(均p < 0.001),表明存在明显的平衡障碍。brief - best评分和COP参数与mJOA评分呈中至强相关性(ρ = 0.310-0.768),在mJOA严重程度水平上差异显著(p < 0.01)。CSA与平衡测量之间存在中等相关性(ρ = 0.212-0.487),而MRI信号强度的增加影响有限。握力和释放以及台阶测试也与平衡测量适度相关(ρ = 0.245-0.640)。结论:与健康对照相比,DCM患者表现出严重的平衡障碍,COP参数和brief - best评分与mJOA评分相关性良好,突出了它们在平衡评估中的效用。CSA和平衡之间的适度关联表明MRI结构变化与DCM的姿势稳定性有关。未来的研究可以通过整合其他客观工具(如运动分析)来加强平衡评估,从而更全面地了解DCM对姿势控制的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial. Intraoperative neuromonitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: are we asking the right questions? The evolving landscape of spinal cord injury: a tale of 3 decades. The association between lumbopelvic fixation and improved pain and function in patients with unstable pathologic sacral fractures. Utility of direct wave intraoperative neuromonitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection. Use of pelvic incidence to predict proximal junctional failure in long-segment spinal fusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1