{"title":"Do We Know the Long-Term Effects of the Most Popular Traditional Swallow Maneuvers on the Submental Muscles?","authors":"Ayşe Kübra Söyler, Nefati Kıylıoğlu, Selen Serel Arslan, Numan Demir, Mustafa Gök, Ersen Ertekin, Tülin Düger","doi":"10.1111/joor.13862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various trainings focus on the submental muscles (SMs) for dysphagia rehabilitation because of their importance for swallowing safety and efficiency. According to the current literature, swallow-specific tasks may be optimal exercises for dysphagia. The effortful swallow (ES) and the Masako maneuver (MM) are the most commonly used swallow-specific tasks in the clinical settings for dysphagia for years, but long-term effects for these trainings is insufficient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate and compare the effects of ES and MM on SM activity, strength and thickness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven healthy adults were randomised to ES, MM and control groups, and ES and MM groups completed 6 weeks of swallowing training. Participants in both training groups performed a total of 120 swallows in each session, while control group did not participate in any swallowing training. Surface electromyography was used to evaluate SM activity, digital dynamometer for SM strength and ultrasonography for SM thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both trainings did not change SM activity (p > 0.05), but increased SM strength (p < 0.05). MM increased the thickness of all SM (p < 0.05), and ES increased the thickness of mylohyoid (right, left) and digastric muscle (right) (p < 0.05), and there was no change in all evaluation parameters in the control group (p > 0.05). Also, trainings were not superior to each other in any parameter (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study provided new evidence to the literature to show that ES and MM trainings are effective for improving SM strength and thickness. Considering that SM is important in terms of swallowing safety and effectiveness, it is thought that both trainings may be promising by increasing the strength and mass of SM, especially in individuals with reduced SM strength and mass.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Various trainings focus on the submental muscles (SMs) for dysphagia rehabilitation because of their importance for swallowing safety and efficiency. According to the current literature, swallow-specific tasks may be optimal exercises for dysphagia. The effortful swallow (ES) and the Masako maneuver (MM) are the most commonly used swallow-specific tasks in the clinical settings for dysphagia for years, but long-term effects for these trainings is insufficient.
Objectives: This study aims to investigate and compare the effects of ES and MM on SM activity, strength and thickness.
Methods: Thirty-seven healthy adults were randomised to ES, MM and control groups, and ES and MM groups completed 6 weeks of swallowing training. Participants in both training groups performed a total of 120 swallows in each session, while control group did not participate in any swallowing training. Surface electromyography was used to evaluate SM activity, digital dynamometer for SM strength and ultrasonography for SM thickness.
Results: Both trainings did not change SM activity (p > 0.05), but increased SM strength (p < 0.05). MM increased the thickness of all SM (p < 0.05), and ES increased the thickness of mylohyoid (right, left) and digastric muscle (right) (p < 0.05), and there was no change in all evaluation parameters in the control group (p > 0.05). Also, trainings were not superior to each other in any parameter (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study provided new evidence to the literature to show that ES and MM trainings are effective for improving SM strength and thickness. Considering that SM is important in terms of swallowing safety and effectiveness, it is thought that both trainings may be promising by increasing the strength and mass of SM, especially in individuals with reduced SM strength and mass.
背景:由于吞咽安全和效率的重要性,针对吞咽困难康复的各种训练主要集中在下颌肌肉(SMs)上。根据目前的文献,吞咽特定任务可能是治疗吞咽困难的最佳练习。多年来,费力吞咽(ES)和正子手法(MM)是吞咽困难临床中最常用的吞咽特定任务,但这些训练的长期效果并不充分:本研究旨在调查和比较 ES 和 MM 对 SM 活性、强度和厚度的影响:37名健康成年人被随机分为ES组、MM组和对照组,ES组和MM组均完成了为期6周的吞咽训练。两个训练组的参与者在每次训练中总共进行了 120 次吞咽,而对照组没有参加任何吞咽训练。采用表面肌电图评估吞咽肌活动,数字测力计评估吞咽肌力量,超声波检查吞咽肌厚度:结果:两种训练都没有改变 SM 的活动(P > 0.05),但增加了 SM 的力量(P 0.05)。此外,两种训练在任何参数上都没有优劣之分(P > 0.05):本研究结果为文献提供了新的证据,表明 ES 和 MM 训练能有效提高 SM 的强度和厚度。考虑到SM对吞咽的安全性和有效性非常重要,我们认为这两种训练都能增加SM的强度和质量,尤其是对SM强度和质量较低的人来说,这两种训练都很有前景。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.