Co-Expression Network and Machine Learning Analysis of Transcriptomics Data Identifies Distinct Gene Signatures and Pathways in Lesional and Non-Lesional Atopic Dermatitis.
Eskezeia Y Dessie, Lili Ding, Latha Satish, Tesfaye B Mersha
{"title":"Co-Expression Network and Machine Learning Analysis of Transcriptomics Data Identifies Distinct Gene Signatures and Pathways in Lesional and Non-Lesional Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"Eskezeia Y Dessie, Lili Ding, Latha Satish, Tesfaye B Mersha","doi":"10.3390/jpm14090960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin condition with complex origins. Current treatments often yield suboptimal results due to an incomplete understanding of its underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to identify pathway and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional AD, non-lesional AD, and healthy skin.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted differential gene expression and co-expression network analyses to identify differentially co-expressed genes (DCEGs) in lesional AD vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional AD, and non-lesional AD vs. healthy skin. Modules associated with lesional and non-lesional AD were identified based on the correlation coefficients between module eigengenes and clinical phenotypes (|R| ≥ 0.5, <i>p</i>-value < 0.05). Subsequently, we employed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) on the identified DCEGs, followed by machine learning (ML) analysis within the pathway expression framework. The ML analysis of pathway expressions, selected by IPA and derived from gene expression data, identified relevant pathway signatures, which were validated using an independent dataset and correlated with AD severity measures (EASI and SCORAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 975, 441, and 40 DCEGs in lesional vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional, and non-lesional vs. healthy skin, respectively. IPA and ML analyses revealed 25 relevant pathway signatures, including wound healing, glucocorticoid receptor signaling, and S100 gene family signaling pathways. Validation confirmed the significance of 10 pathway signatures, which were correlated with the AD severity measures. DCEGs such as MMP12 and S100A8 demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy (AUC > 0.70) in both the discovery and validation datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differential gene expression, co-expression networks and ML analyses of pathway expression have unveiled relevant pathways and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional, non-lesional, and healthy skin, providing valuable insights into AD pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14090960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin condition with complex origins. Current treatments often yield suboptimal results due to an incomplete understanding of its underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to identify pathway and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional AD, non-lesional AD, and healthy skin.
Method: We conducted differential gene expression and co-expression network analyses to identify differentially co-expressed genes (DCEGs) in lesional AD vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional AD, and non-lesional AD vs. healthy skin. Modules associated with lesional and non-lesional AD were identified based on the correlation coefficients between module eigengenes and clinical phenotypes (|R| ≥ 0.5, p-value < 0.05). Subsequently, we employed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) on the identified DCEGs, followed by machine learning (ML) analysis within the pathway expression framework. The ML analysis of pathway expressions, selected by IPA and derived from gene expression data, identified relevant pathway signatures, which were validated using an independent dataset and correlated with AD severity measures (EASI and SCORAD).
Results: We identified 975, 441, and 40 DCEGs in lesional vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional, and non-lesional vs. healthy skin, respectively. IPA and ML analyses revealed 25 relevant pathway signatures, including wound healing, glucocorticoid receptor signaling, and S100 gene family signaling pathways. Validation confirmed the significance of 10 pathway signatures, which were correlated with the AD severity measures. DCEGs such as MMP12 and S100A8 demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy (AUC > 0.70) in both the discovery and validation datasets.
Conclusions: Differential gene expression, co-expression networks and ML analyses of pathway expression have unveiled relevant pathways and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional, non-lesional, and healthy skin, providing valuable insights into AD pathogenesis.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.