Co-Expression Network and Machine Learning Analysis of Transcriptomics Data Identifies Distinct Gene Signatures and Pathways in Lesional and Non-Lesional Atopic Dermatitis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.3390/jpm14090960
Eskezeia Y Dessie, Lili Ding, Latha Satish, Tesfaye B Mersha
{"title":"Co-Expression Network and Machine Learning Analysis of Transcriptomics Data Identifies Distinct Gene Signatures and Pathways in Lesional and Non-Lesional Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"Eskezeia Y Dessie, Lili Ding, Latha Satish, Tesfaye B Mersha","doi":"10.3390/jpm14090960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin condition with complex origins. Current treatments often yield suboptimal results due to an incomplete understanding of its underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to identify pathway and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional AD, non-lesional AD, and healthy skin.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted differential gene expression and co-expression network analyses to identify differentially co-expressed genes (DCEGs) in lesional AD vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional AD, and non-lesional AD vs. healthy skin. Modules associated with lesional and non-lesional AD were identified based on the correlation coefficients between module eigengenes and clinical phenotypes (|R| ≥ 0.5, <i>p</i>-value < 0.05). Subsequently, we employed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) on the identified DCEGs, followed by machine learning (ML) analysis within the pathway expression framework. The ML analysis of pathway expressions, selected by IPA and derived from gene expression data, identified relevant pathway signatures, which were validated using an independent dataset and correlated with AD severity measures (EASI and SCORAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 975, 441, and 40 DCEGs in lesional vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional, and non-lesional vs. healthy skin, respectively. IPA and ML analyses revealed 25 relevant pathway signatures, including wound healing, glucocorticoid receptor signaling, and S100 gene family signaling pathways. Validation confirmed the significance of 10 pathway signatures, which were correlated with the AD severity measures. DCEGs such as MMP12 and S100A8 demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy (AUC > 0.70) in both the discovery and validation datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differential gene expression, co-expression networks and ML analyses of pathway expression have unveiled relevant pathways and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional, non-lesional, and healthy skin, providing valuable insights into AD pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14090960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin condition with complex origins. Current treatments often yield suboptimal results due to an incomplete understanding of its underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to identify pathway and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional AD, non-lesional AD, and healthy skin.

Method: We conducted differential gene expression and co-expression network analyses to identify differentially co-expressed genes (DCEGs) in lesional AD vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional AD, and non-lesional AD vs. healthy skin. Modules associated with lesional and non-lesional AD were identified based on the correlation coefficients between module eigengenes and clinical phenotypes (|R| ≥ 0.5, p-value < 0.05). Subsequently, we employed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) on the identified DCEGs, followed by machine learning (ML) analysis within the pathway expression framework. The ML analysis of pathway expressions, selected by IPA and derived from gene expression data, identified relevant pathway signatures, which were validated using an independent dataset and correlated with AD severity measures (EASI and SCORAD).

Results: We identified 975, 441, and 40 DCEGs in lesional vs. healthy skin, lesional vs. non-lesional, and non-lesional vs. healthy skin, respectively. IPA and ML analyses revealed 25 relevant pathway signatures, including wound healing, glucocorticoid receptor signaling, and S100 gene family signaling pathways. Validation confirmed the significance of 10 pathway signatures, which were correlated with the AD severity measures. DCEGs such as MMP12 and S100A8 demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy (AUC > 0.70) in both the discovery and validation datasets.

Conclusions: Differential gene expression, co-expression networks and ML analyses of pathway expression have unveiled relevant pathways and gene signatures that distinguish between lesional, non-lesional, and healthy skin, providing valuable insights into AD pathogenesis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转录组学数据的共表达网络和机器学习分析确定了皮损性和非皮损性特应性皮炎的不同基因特征和通路
背景:特应性皮炎(AD)是一种常见的炎症性皮肤病,病因复杂。由于对特应性皮炎的潜在机制了解不全面,目前的治疗方法往往达不到最佳效果。本研究旨在确定区分病变性 AD、非病变性 AD 和健康皮肤的通路和基因特征:我们进行了差异基因表达和共表达网络分析,以确定病变性 AD 与健康皮肤、病变性 AD 与非病变性 AD 以及非病变性 AD 与健康皮肤中的差异共表达基因(DCEGs)。根据模块基因与临床表型之间的相关系数(|R| ≥ 0.5,p 值 < 0.05),确定了与病变和非病变 AD 相关的模块。随后,我们对确定的 DCEGs 采用了 Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA),然后在通路表达框架内进行了机器学习 (ML) 分析。通过对IPA选择的、来自基因表达数据的通路表达进行ML分析,确定了相关的通路特征,并通过一个独立的数据集对其进行了验证,还将其与AD严重程度测量(EASI和SCORAD)相关联:结果:我们在病变皮肤与健康皮肤、病变皮肤与非病变皮肤、非病变皮肤与健康皮肤中分别发现了 975 个、441 个和 40 个 DCEG。IPA和ML分析揭示了25个相关通路特征,包括伤口愈合、糖皮质激素受体信号传导和S100基因家族信号传导通路。验证证实了 10 个通路特征的重要性,这些通路特征与注意力缺失症的严重程度相关。在发现数据集和验证数据集中,MMP12和S100A8等DCEG都显示出很高的诊断效力(AUC > 0.70):差异基因表达、共表达网络和通路表达的ML分析揭示了区分病变、非病变和健康皮肤的相关通路和基因特征,为了解AD发病机制提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Applications of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systems in the Management of Esophageal Varices. Clinical and Laboratory Parameters Associated with PICU Admission in Children with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Associated with COVID-19 (MIS-C). Oral Care in Head and Neck Radiotherapy: Proposal for an Oral Hygiene Protocol. Sinonasal Outcomes Obtained after 2 Years of Treatment with Benralizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma and CRSwNP: A "Real-Life" Observational Study. Melatonin Receptors and Serotonin: Age-Related Changes in the Ovaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1