Investigating Painkiller Use in Amateur Football: A Coach's Perspective.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.3390/jpm14091003
Andreas Kopf, Werner Krutsch, Dominik Szymski, Johannes Weber, Volker Alt, Hermann Josef Bail, Niklas Engel, Johannes Rüther, Lorenz Huber
{"title":"Investigating Painkiller Use in Amateur Football: A Coach's Perspective.","authors":"Andreas Kopf, Werner Krutsch, Dominik Szymski, Johannes Weber, Volker Alt, Hermann Josef Bail, Niklas Engel, Johannes Rüther, Lorenz Huber","doi":"10.3390/jpm14091003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Painkiller use in amateur sports and, especially, in football is increasingly being discussed, but the scientific data on this field are very limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of painkiller use in amateur football from the perspective of coaches, as well as to determine how and to which extent coaches can influence their teams in terms of painkiller use and prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an online questionnaire, a cross-sectional analysis of painkiller use in German amateur football from the 4th league to the lowest amateur classes was carried out from the perspective of team coaches. A total of 628 participants were contacted, and 400 (63.7%) completed the questionnaire completely and were therefore included in the evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 400 participating team coaches in amateur football, 369 (92.3%) were male and 31 (7.7%) were female. The coaches reported that 36.2% (SD = 29.1) of their players have used painkillers at some point due to football-related pain in their career. The majority of coaches believed that the use of painkillers is not compatible with competition (74%), and even more believed that it is not compatible with football training (90.8%). Furthermore, 56.2% of the coaches themselves had already taken painkillers in their own football career for football-related pain, and 64% had already bought over-the-counter painkillers without a prescription. The use of painkillers increased in the higher playing levels. The availability of painkillers in first aid kits was reported by around 60%, but they were reported as freely accessible in the dressing room by only 10% of the coaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to describe the painkiller use in amateur football from the perspective of coaches. The prevalence of painkiller use in this study was found to be significantly lower than what is indicated in the data from the existing literature. The majority of coaches see the use of painkillers during games and training as incompatible, even though there is a large proportion of coaches who have already bought over-the-counter painkillers for football-related pain. As the first scientific analysis of team coaches, this study provides fundamental data for the prevention of excessive painkiller use in amateur football.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14091003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Painkiller use in amateur sports and, especially, in football is increasingly being discussed, but the scientific data on this field are very limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of painkiller use in amateur football from the perspective of coaches, as well as to determine how and to which extent coaches can influence their teams in terms of painkiller use and prevention.

Methods: Using an online questionnaire, a cross-sectional analysis of painkiller use in German amateur football from the 4th league to the lowest amateur classes was carried out from the perspective of team coaches. A total of 628 participants were contacted, and 400 (63.7%) completed the questionnaire completely and were therefore included in the evaluation.

Results: Of the 400 participating team coaches in amateur football, 369 (92.3%) were male and 31 (7.7%) were female. The coaches reported that 36.2% (SD = 29.1) of their players have used painkillers at some point due to football-related pain in their career. The majority of coaches believed that the use of painkillers is not compatible with competition (74%), and even more believed that it is not compatible with football training (90.8%). Furthermore, 56.2% of the coaches themselves had already taken painkillers in their own football career for football-related pain, and 64% had already bought over-the-counter painkillers without a prescription. The use of painkillers increased in the higher playing levels. The availability of painkillers in first aid kits was reported by around 60%, but they were reported as freely accessible in the dressing room by only 10% of the coaches.

Conclusions: This is the first study to describe the painkiller use in amateur football from the perspective of coaches. The prevalence of painkiller use in this study was found to be significantly lower than what is indicated in the data from the existing literature. The majority of coaches see the use of painkillers during games and training as incompatible, even though there is a large proportion of coaches who have already bought over-the-counter painkillers for football-related pain. As the first scientific analysis of team coaches, this study provides fundamental data for the prevention of excessive painkiller use in amateur football.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查业余足球运动员使用止痛药的情况:教练的视角。
背景/目的:业余体育运动,尤其是足球运动中使用止痛药的讨论越来越多,但这方面的科学数据却非常有限。因此,本研究旨在从教练员的角度调查业余足球运动中使用止痛药的普遍程度,并确定教练员如何以及在多大程度上能够在止痛药的使用和预防方面影响其球队:通过在线问卷调查,从球队教练的角度对德国业余足球(从第四级别联赛到最低级别业余足球)中止痛药的使用情况进行了横向分析。共联系了 628 名参与者,其中 400 人(63.7%)完整填写了问卷,因此被纳入评估范围:在 400 名业余足球队教练中,369 人(92.3%)为男性,31 人(7.7%)为女性。教练们表示,他们的球员中有 36.2%(SD = 29.1)的人在职业生涯中曾因足球相关疼痛而使用过止痛药。大多数教练认为使用止痛药与比赛不符(74%),更多的教练认为使用止痛药与足球训练不符(90.8%)。此外,有 56.2%的教练员在自己的足球生涯中曾因与足球有关的疼痛而服用过止痛药,64%的教练员曾在没有处方的情况下购买过非处方止痛药。比赛级别越高,止痛药的使用率越高。约有 60% 的人表示急救包中备有止痛药,但只有 10% 的教练表示在更衣室中可以随意取用止痛药:这是首次从教练员的角度描述业余足球运动中止痛药使用情况的研究。本研究发现,止痛药的使用率明显低于现有文献中的数据。大多数教练认为在比赛和训练期间使用止痛药是不相容的,尽管有很大一部分教练已经购买了非处方止痛药来治疗与足球有关的疼痛。作为首次对球队教练进行的科学分析,这项研究为防止业余足球运动员过度使用止痛药提供了基础数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Applications of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systems in the Management of Esophageal Varices. Clinical and Laboratory Parameters Associated with PICU Admission in Children with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Associated with COVID-19 (MIS-C). Oral Care in Head and Neck Radiotherapy: Proposal for an Oral Hygiene Protocol. Sinonasal Outcomes Obtained after 2 Years of Treatment with Benralizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma and CRSwNP: A "Real-Life" Observational Study. Melatonin Receptors and Serotonin: Age-Related Changes in the Ovaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1