Muscle strength in sport climbing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15925-7
Søren A Skriver, Rasmus Sørensen, Mikkel Oxfeldt, Ulrik Dalgas
{"title":"Muscle strength in sport climbing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Søren A Skriver, Rasmus Sørensen, Mikkel Oxfeldt, Ulrik Dalgas","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15925-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to synthesize the literature comparing muscle strength and endurance characteristics between 1) sport climbers and non-climbing controls; 2) sport climbers at different performance levels; and 3) boulderers and lead climbers.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic literature search (PubMed, Embase and SportDiscus) was performed. Inclusion criteria involved participants aged ≥18, muscular performance measurements and comparisons of either: climbers and non-climbers, boulder climbers and lead-climbers, or climbers of different levels. Meta-analyses comparing grip strength and muscle endurance of the forearm between sport climbers and non-climbers, and finger strength between boulders and lead climbers were conducted providing the standardized mean difference (SMD).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 960 climbers and 301 non-climbers were included in the study. The data showed: 1) Compared to non-climbers, climbers showed significantly higher grip strength: SMD 1.82 (95% CI 1.23; 2.41, P<0.001) and underarm endurance: SMD 0.70 (95% CI 0.17; 1.24, P=0.01); 2) compared to lead-climbers, boulder climbers showed significantly higher finger strength: SMD 1.08 (95% CI 0.54; 1.62, P<0.001); 3) higher-level climbers showed better finger strength, grip strength, forearm endurance and powerslap when compared to lower-level climbers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Climbers had superior grip strength and forearm endurance compared to non-climbers. High-level climbers exhibited better finger strength, grip strength, forearm endurance and powerslap, when compared to lower-level climbers. Finally, boulder climbers exhibited greater finger strength than lead-climbers. These findings expand our understandings of climbers' physical attributes across disciplines and levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"80-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15925-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to synthesize the literature comparing muscle strength and endurance characteristics between 1) sport climbers and non-climbing controls; 2) sport climbers at different performance levels; and 3) boulderers and lead climbers.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature search (PubMed, Embase and SportDiscus) was performed. Inclusion criteria involved participants aged ≥18, muscular performance measurements and comparisons of either: climbers and non-climbers, boulder climbers and lead-climbers, or climbers of different levels. Meta-analyses comparing grip strength and muscle endurance of the forearm between sport climbers and non-climbers, and finger strength between boulders and lead climbers were conducted providing the standardized mean difference (SMD).

Evidence synthesis: A total of 960 climbers and 301 non-climbers were included in the study. The data showed: 1) Compared to non-climbers, climbers showed significantly higher grip strength: SMD 1.82 (95% CI 1.23; 2.41, P<0.001) and underarm endurance: SMD 0.70 (95% CI 0.17; 1.24, P=0.01); 2) compared to lead-climbers, boulder climbers showed significantly higher finger strength: SMD 1.08 (95% CI 0.54; 1.62, P<0.001); 3) higher-level climbers showed better finger strength, grip strength, forearm endurance and powerslap when compared to lower-level climbers.

Conclusions: Climbers had superior grip strength and forearm endurance compared to non-climbers. High-level climbers exhibited better finger strength, grip strength, forearm endurance and powerslap, when compared to lower-level climbers. Finally, boulder climbers exhibited greater finger strength than lead-climbers. These findings expand our understandings of climbers' physical attributes across disciplines and levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
攀岩运动中的肌肉力量:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:本研究旨在综合文献,比较 1) 运动攀岩者和非攀岩对照组;2) 不同水平的运动攀岩者;3) 抱石者和主攀岩者的肌肉力量和耐力特征:进行了系统的文献检索(PubMed、Embase 和 SportDiscus)。纳入标准包括年龄≥18 岁的参与者、肌肉性能测量结果以及以下几种情况的比较:攀岩者和非攀岩者、巨石攀岩者和主攀岩者或不同水平的攀岩者。对运动攀岩者和非攀岩者的前臂握力和肌肉耐力以及巨石攀岩者和攀岩者的手指力量进行了元分析比较,并提供了标准化平均差(SMD):研究共纳入了 960 名攀岩运动员和 301 名非攀岩运动员。数据显示1)与非登山者相比,登山者的握力明显更高:SMD 1.82 (95% CI 1.23; 2.41, PConclusions:与非攀岩运动员相比,攀岩运动员的握力和前臂耐力更胜一筹。与水平较低的攀岩者相比,水平较高的攀岩者在手指力量、握力、前臂耐力和力量拍击方面表现更佳。最后,巨石攀岩者比领攀者表现出更强的手指力量。这些发现拓展了我们对不同学科和水平的攀岩者身体素质的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Caribbean and Latin dance: evidence about health in professional and non-professional dancers. Characteristics of trunk and pelvic kinematics during batting motion in baseball players with low back pain history. An intermittent recovery test for soccer players: a validation study. Differences in throwing kinematics due to changes in run-up speed in javelin throwing. Cut-off values for estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in terms of physical functioning among middle-aged to older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1