Validating the CogSleep Screener in older adults at a memory and cognition clinic.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14355
Shawn Dexiao Kong, Zoe Menczel Schrire, Ping Hsiu Lin, Simone Simonetti, Nathan Cross, Loren Mowszowski, Catriona Ireland, Ivana Rosenzweig, Sharon L Naismith
{"title":"Validating the CogSleep Screener in older adults at a memory and cognition clinic.","authors":"Shawn Dexiao Kong, Zoe Menczel Schrire, Ping Hsiu Lin, Simone Simonetti, Nathan Cross, Loren Mowszowski, Catriona Ireland, Ivana Rosenzweig, Sharon L Naismith","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While sleep disturbances are prevalent in older people and are linked with poor health and cognitive outcomes, screening for the range of sleep disturbances is inefficient and therefore not ideal nor routine in memory and cognition clinic settings. We aimed to develop and validate a new brief self-report questionnaire for easy use within memory and cognition clinics. The design for this study was cross-sectional. Older adults (aged ≥50 in Sydney, Australia) were recruited from a memory and cognition research clinic. Participants (N = 402, mean age 67.3 years, range 50-86, 63.6% female) completed a comprehensive medical, neuropsychological, and mental health assessment, alongside self-report instruments, including existing sleep questionnaires and a new 10-item sleep questionnaire, the CogSleep Screener. We examined the factor structure, convergent validity, internal consistency, and discriminant validity of this novel questionnaire. Using exploratory principal component analysis, a 3-factor solution was generated highlighting the factors of Insomnia, Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Symptoms and Daytime Sleepiness. Each factor was significantly correlated with currently used sleep questionnaires for each subdomain (all Spearman rho >0.3, all p < 0.001), suggesting good convergent validity. Internal consistency was also good (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed good discriminative ability between participants with and without sleep disturbances (all area under curve >0.7, all p < 0.01). The CogSleep Screener has good psychometric properties in older to elderly adults attending a memory and cognition clinic. The instrument has the potential to be used in memory clinics and other clinical settings to provide quick and accurate screening of sleep disturbances.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While sleep disturbances are prevalent in older people and are linked with poor health and cognitive outcomes, screening for the range of sleep disturbances is inefficient and therefore not ideal nor routine in memory and cognition clinic settings. We aimed to develop and validate a new brief self-report questionnaire for easy use within memory and cognition clinics. The design for this study was cross-sectional. Older adults (aged ≥50 in Sydney, Australia) were recruited from a memory and cognition research clinic. Participants (N = 402, mean age 67.3 years, range 50-86, 63.6% female) completed a comprehensive medical, neuropsychological, and mental health assessment, alongside self-report instruments, including existing sleep questionnaires and a new 10-item sleep questionnaire, the CogSleep Screener. We examined the factor structure, convergent validity, internal consistency, and discriminant validity of this novel questionnaire. Using exploratory principal component analysis, a 3-factor solution was generated highlighting the factors of Insomnia, Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Symptoms and Daytime Sleepiness. Each factor was significantly correlated with currently used sleep questionnaires for each subdomain (all Spearman rho >0.3, all p < 0.001), suggesting good convergent validity. Internal consistency was also good (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed good discriminative ability between participants with and without sleep disturbances (all area under curve >0.7, all p < 0.01). The CogSleep Screener has good psychometric properties in older to elderly adults attending a memory and cognition clinic. The instrument has the potential to be used in memory clinics and other clinical settings to provide quick and accurate screening of sleep disturbances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在记忆和认知诊所验证老年人的 CogSleep Screener。
虽然睡眠障碍在老年人中很普遍,而且与不良的健康和认知结果有关,但对各种睡眠障碍进行筛查的效率很低,因此在记忆和认知诊所中并不理想,也不是例行工作。我们旨在开发并验证一种新的简短自我报告问卷,以便于在记忆和认知诊所中使用。本研究采用横断面设计。我们从一家记忆和认知研究诊所招募了老年人(年龄≥50 岁,居住在澳大利亚悉尼)。参与者(N = 402,平均年龄 67.3 岁,年龄在 50-86 岁之间,女性占 63.6%)在完成自我报告工具(包括现有的睡眠问卷和新的 10 项睡眠问卷,即 CogSleep Screener)的同时,还完成了全面的医疗、神经心理学和心理健康评估。我们研究了这份新问卷的因子结构、收敛效度、内部一致性和判别效度。通过探索性主成分分析,得出了一个 3 因子解决方案,突出了失眠、快速眼动(REM)症状和白天嗜睡这三个因子。每个因子与目前使用的睡眠问卷的每个子域都有明显的相关性(所有 Spearman rho 均大于 0.3,所有 p 均为 0.7,所有 p 均为 0.5)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Poor sleep quality is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective cohort study. Pilot analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based contributors to patient-centred optimization of mandibular advancement devices in obstructive sleep apnea. Differential effects of sleep position and sleep stage on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sex-specific changes in sleep quality with aging: Insights from wearable device analysis. The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1