Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) scale.

Q3 Medicine Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.22365/jpsych.2024.017
Emmanouil S Benioudakis, Argyroula Kalaitzaki, Eleni Karlafti, Oxana Ahanov, Elisavet Kapageridou, Christos Savopoulos, Triantafyllos Didangelos
{"title":"Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) scale.","authors":"Emmanouil S Benioudakis, Argyroula Kalaitzaki, Eleni Karlafti, Oxana Ahanov, Elisavet Kapageridou, Christos Savopoulos, Triantafyllos Didangelos","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is a chronic condition with rising prevalence. The only treatment for individuals with T1D to prevent diabetes-related complications is exogenous insulin administration. Diabetes-related technology has significantly contributed to the management of T1D by reducing the burden of living with diabetes and providing greater flexibility in insulin management during daily activities. This study presents the psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) Scale, which assesses satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device and the impact of diabetes management on individuals with T1D. A sample of 101 adults with T1D, mostly females (71.3%), with a mean age of 38.4 years (± 11.7), completed the translated Greek version of DIDS (DIDS-Gr). Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: 'Device Satisfaction', 'Diabetes Management Impact', and (new factor) 'Device Usability'. The internal consistency indices (Cronbach's alpha) for the subscales were 0.86, 0.71, and 0.60, respectively. Furthermore, convergent validity was demonstrated with moderate to high positive correlations between the DIDS-Grand the Diabetes Quality of Life Brief Clinical Inventory (DQoL-BCI) and its subscales, while divergent validity was also confirmed with weaker correlations with the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Additionally, test-retest reliability and differential validity were present in our study. Therefore, DIDS-Gr is a valid and reliable measure for assessing the impact of diabetes on individuals with T1D and the satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device in Greece.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2024.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is a chronic condition with rising prevalence. The only treatment for individuals with T1D to prevent diabetes-related complications is exogenous insulin administration. Diabetes-related technology has significantly contributed to the management of T1D by reducing the burden of living with diabetes and providing greater flexibility in insulin management during daily activities. This study presents the psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) Scale, which assesses satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device and the impact of diabetes management on individuals with T1D. A sample of 101 adults with T1D, mostly females (71.3%), with a mean age of 38.4 years (± 11.7), completed the translated Greek version of DIDS (DIDS-Gr). Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: 'Device Satisfaction', 'Diabetes Management Impact', and (new factor) 'Device Usability'. The internal consistency indices (Cronbach's alpha) for the subscales were 0.86, 0.71, and 0.60, respectively. Furthermore, convergent validity was demonstrated with moderate to high positive correlations between the DIDS-Grand the Diabetes Quality of Life Brief Clinical Inventory (DQoL-BCI) and its subscales, while divergent validity was also confirmed with weaker correlations with the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Additionally, test-retest reliability and differential validity were present in our study. Therefore, DIDS-Gr is a valid and reliable measure for assessing the impact of diabetes on individuals with T1D and the satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device in Greece.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊语版糖尿病影响和设备满意度量表(DIDS)的维度和心理测量特性。
1 型糖尿病(T1D)是一种慢性疾病,发病率不断上升。T1D 患者预防糖尿病相关并发症的唯一治疗方法是注射外源性胰岛素。与糖尿病相关的技术大大促进了 T1D 的管理,减轻了糖尿病患者的生活负担,并在日常活动中提供了更大的胰岛素管理灵活性。本研究介绍了糖尿病影响和设备满意度(DIDS)量表希腊语译文的心理测量特性,该量表用于评估胰岛素给药设备使用的满意度以及糖尿病管理对 T1D 患者的影响。101名患有T1D的成人完成了希腊语翻译版的DIDS(DIDS-Gr),其中大部分为女性(71.3%),平均年龄为38.4岁(± 11.7)岁。探索性因子分析显示了三个因子:设备满意度"、"糖尿病管理影响 "和(新因素)"设备可用性"。子量表的内部一致性指数(Cronbach's alpha)分别为 0.86、0.71 和 0.60。此外,DIDS-Grand 与糖尿病生活质量简明临床量表(DQoL-BCI)及其各分量表之间的中度至高度正相关性证明了其收敛效度,而与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)抑郁分量表之间较弱的相关性也证实了其发散效度。此外,我们的研究还发现了测试重复信度和差异效度。因此,DIDS-Gr 是一种有效、可靠的测量方法,可用于评估糖尿病对希腊 T1D 患者的影响以及对胰岛素给药装置使用的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Disaster Psychiatry: An urgent field in psychiatry posing a pertinent question. Under pressure: A systematic review of the mental health impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health workers. ["Pseudoneurotransmission" and gut microbiome - brain communication in neuropsychiatric disorders]. A systematic review of depressive and anxiety symptoms in caregivers of dementia patients. Death anxiety, life's meaninglessness, and mental resilience among women with symptoms of behavioral addictions and alcohol use disorder: Using the existential approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1