Pub Date : 2024-12-27Epub Date: 2024-12-03DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.019
Epameinondas Evangelos Kantidakis, Emmanouil K Symvoulakis, Maria Basta, Evgenia Chourdaki, Helen Dimitriou
Persons with mental health disorders are vulnerable, with demanding care needs. This cross-sectional study aimed to report on their vaccination coverage against COVID-19 and common vaccine-preventable diseases. The study was conducted from September to November 2022 at the psychiatric outpatient settings of Venizeleion General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece, and the Mental Health Center of Heraklion. Information was collected via personal medical interview and prescription data. The study population included 361 participants, with a mean age of 49.8±14.3 years, 59.0% women. The most common diagnoses were recurrent depressive disorder (24.1%), schizophrenia (22.7%), anxiety disorder (21.3%), and bipolar disorder (15.7%). Vaccination coverage against seasonal influenza for 2020, 2021, and 2022 was 43.2%, 39.8%, and 40.7%, respectively. Pneumococcal vaccination included the conjugate (28.8%) and polysaccharide (7.7%) vaccines. Vaccination against Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis (TDP) accounted for 11.0%, Hepatitis B for 5.8%, and Herpes Zoster for 27.1%. COVID-19 vaccination, with at least one booster dose, reached a high 73.6%. Patients with severe mental illness, 139 out of 361, were less likely to have contracted COVID-19 (50/139, 35.9%) than those without (108/222, 46.6%), (p=0.018). Coverage with polysaccharide vaccine, TDP, and Hepatitis B, was very low. Patients annually vaccinated for influenza in the last three consecutive years were most likely to be fully vaccinated for pneumococcal disease and for COVID-19 (with at least one booster dose). Future research and clinical practice should focus on identifying patients at risk of not receiving preventive services, such as vaccines.
{"title":"Vaccination coverage of persons using hospital outpatient mental health services at Heraklion, Crete, Greece: A cross-sectional study during pandemic.","authors":"Epameinondas Evangelos Kantidakis, Emmanouil K Symvoulakis, Maria Basta, Evgenia Chourdaki, Helen Dimitriou","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.019","DOIUrl":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persons with mental health disorders are vulnerable, with demanding care needs. This cross-sectional study aimed to report on their vaccination coverage against COVID-19 and common vaccine-preventable diseases. The study was conducted from September to November 2022 at the psychiatric outpatient settings of Venizeleion General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece, and the Mental Health Center of Heraklion. Information was collected via personal medical interview and prescription data. The study population included 361 participants, with a mean age of 49.8±14.3 years, 59.0% women. The most common diagnoses were recurrent depressive disorder (24.1%), schizophrenia (22.7%), anxiety disorder (21.3%), and bipolar disorder (15.7%). Vaccination coverage against seasonal influenza for 2020, 2021, and 2022 was 43.2%, 39.8%, and 40.7%, respectively. Pneumococcal vaccination included the conjugate (28.8%) and polysaccharide (7.7%) vaccines. Vaccination against Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis (TDP) accounted for 11.0%, Hepatitis B for 5.8%, and Herpes Zoster for 27.1%. COVID-19 vaccination, with at least one booster dose, reached a high 73.6%. Patients with severe mental illness, 139 out of 361, were less likely to have contracted COVID-19 (50/139, 35.9%) than those without (108/222, 46.6%), (p=0.018). Coverage with polysaccharide vaccine, TDP, and Hepatitis B, was very low. Patients annually vaccinated for influenza in the last three consecutive years were most likely to be fully vaccinated for pneumococcal disease and for COVID-19 (with at least one booster dose). Future research and clinical practice should focus on identifying patients at risk of not receiving preventive services, such as vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":"282-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent restrictive measures on the mental health and well-being of the population and psychiatric patients have been widely recognized. Patients' treatment attendance and engagement with mental health services had been negatively affected by the pandemic, whereas patients were less likely to receive timely outpatient care. The pandemic also impacted the use of inpatient services. The aim of the present study was to explore the variability of attendance and admissions to a general hospital psychiatric ward over a 12-month interval after the onset of the pandemic (March 2020), compared to the respective 12-month pre-pandemic interval. A retrospective, observational pre/post study was performed, involving a general hospital psychiatric ward in Corfu, Northwest Greece, which serves an insular catchment area of approximately 100,000 inhabitants. For data analysis, c- and u-charts of statistical process control charts were employed, using monthly data (March 2019 to February 2021). Overall, a significant decline in attendance rates was observed, mostly accounted for by a 26.5% reduction in voluntary attendance rates (1516 patients prior vs. 1114 patients after the onset of the pandemic). The involuntary commitment of patients did not differ between the two periods (106 prior vs. 100 after the onset of the pandemic). Admission rates did not change significantly between the two periods. Diagnoses that exhibited significant variance in examinations between the two study periods were mood disorders and personality disorders, whereas there was no significant variation in the number of admissions across different diagnoses. Length of hospital stay increased significantly by 13.2% over the first year of the pandemic, from 25.57 days (Md= 13, IQR= 22) during the pre-COVID-19 period to 28.95 days (Md= 22, IQR= 28) during the COVID-19 period. Patients with schizophrenia and related disorders (Mean= 34.25 days, SD= 43.19) and mood disorders (Mean= 26.26, SD= 33.48) had prolonged hospital stays compared to other diagnoses. These findings highlight significant shifts in psychiatric care delivery during the pandemic and underscore the need for targeted interventions to address the evolving demands on mental health services during public health crises.
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admissions in a psychiatric ward in a general hospital in Greece.","authors":"Ioanna-Athina Botsari, Anastasios Papatsoris, Petros Argitis, Nicholas-Tiberio Economou, Vaios Peritogiannis","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.018","DOIUrl":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent restrictive measures on the mental health and well-being of the population and psychiatric patients have been widely recognized. Patients' treatment attendance and engagement with mental health services had been negatively affected by the pandemic, whereas patients were less likely to receive timely outpatient care. The pandemic also impacted the use of inpatient services. The aim of the present study was to explore the variability of attendance and admissions to a general hospital psychiatric ward over a 12-month interval after the onset of the pandemic (March 2020), compared to the respective 12-month pre-pandemic interval. A retrospective, observational pre/post study was performed, involving a general hospital psychiatric ward in Corfu, Northwest Greece, which serves an insular catchment area of approximately 100,000 inhabitants. For data analysis, c- and u-charts of statistical process control charts were employed, using monthly data (March 2019 to February 2021). Overall, a significant decline in attendance rates was observed, mostly accounted for by a 26.5% reduction in voluntary attendance rates (1516 patients prior vs. 1114 patients after the onset of the pandemic). The involuntary commitment of patients did not differ between the two periods (106 prior vs. 100 after the onset of the pandemic). Admission rates did not change significantly between the two periods. Diagnoses that exhibited significant variance in examinations between the two study periods were mood disorders and personality disorders, whereas there was no significant variation in the number of admissions across different diagnoses. Length of hospital stay increased significantly by 13.2% over the first year of the pandemic, from 25.57 days (Md= 13, IQR= 22) during the pre-COVID-19 period to 28.95 days (Md= 22, IQR= 28) during the COVID-19 period. Patients with schizophrenia and related disorders (Mean= 34.25 days, SD= 43.19) and mood disorders (Mean= 26.26, SD= 33.48) had prolonged hospital stays compared to other diagnoses. These findings highlight significant shifts in psychiatric care delivery during the pandemic and underscore the need for targeted interventions to address the evolving demands on mental health services during public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":"269-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is a chronic condition with rising prevalence. The only treatment for individuals with T1D to prevent diabetes-related complications is exogenous insulin administration. Diabetes-related technology has significantly contributed to the management of T1D by reducing the burden of living with diabetes and providing greater flexibility in insulin management during daily activities. This study presents the psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) Scale, which assesses satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device and the impact of diabetes management on individuals with T1D. A sample of 101 adults with T1D, mostly females (71.3%), with a mean age of 38.4 years (± 11.7), completed the translated Greek version of DIDS (DIDS-Gr). Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: 'Device Satisfaction', 'Diabetes Management Impact', and (new factor) 'Device Usability'. The internal consistency indices (Cronbach's alpha) for the subscales were 0.86, 0.71, and 0.60, respectively. Furthermore, convergent validity was demonstrated with moderate to high positive correlations between the DIDS-Grand the Diabetes Quality of Life Brief Clinical Inventory (DQoL-BCI) and its subscales, while divergent validity was also confirmed with weaker correlations with the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Additionally, test-retest reliability and differential validity were present in our study. Therefore, DIDS-Gr is a valid and reliable measure for assessing the impact of diabetes on individuals with T1D and the satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device in Greece.
{"title":"Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) scale.","authors":"Emmanouil S Benioudakis, Argyroula Kalaitzaki, Eleni Karlafti, Oxana Ahanov, Elisavet Kapageridou, Christos Savopoulos, Triantafyllos Didangelos","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.017","DOIUrl":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is a chronic condition with rising prevalence. The only treatment for individuals with T1D to prevent diabetes-related complications is exogenous insulin administration. Diabetes-related technology has significantly contributed to the management of T1D by reducing the burden of living with diabetes and providing greater flexibility in insulin management during daily activities. This study presents the psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) Scale, which assesses satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device and the impact of diabetes management on individuals with T1D. A sample of 101 adults with T1D, mostly females (71.3%), with a mean age of 38.4 years (± 11.7), completed the translated Greek version of DIDS (DIDS-Gr). Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: 'Device Satisfaction', 'Diabetes Management Impact', and (new factor) 'Device Usability'. The internal consistency indices (Cronbach's alpha) for the subscales were 0.86, 0.71, and 0.60, respectively. Furthermore, convergent validity was demonstrated with moderate to high positive correlations between the DIDS-Grand the Diabetes Quality of Life Brief Clinical Inventory (DQoL-BCI) and its subscales, while divergent validity was also confirmed with weaker correlations with the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Additionally, test-retest reliability and differential validity were present in our study. Therefore, DIDS-Gr is a valid and reliable measure for assessing the impact of diabetes on individuals with T1D and the satisfaction with the use of an insulin delivery device in Greece.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":"314-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142352611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27Epub Date: 2024-12-15DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.022
Nikos Christodoulou
<p><p>Disasters, both natural and man-made, impose a significant burden on the mental health of individuals, communities, and societies. The frequency and intensity of disasters are increasing; 3–4fold compared to the last century, with 400–500 significant disasters/year, affecting >1.5 billion people worldwide and costing 250–400 billion dollars/year. Most natural disasters are directly or indirectly linked to climate change, itself a natural disaster of human origin. Armed conflict is another human self-infliction; 59 state-based conflicts are currently active, the highest since WW2 (Uppsala Conflict Data Program-UCDP1). The mental health impact of disasters is multifaceted, influencing both immediate and long-term mental health outcomes. Acute stress, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represent just the direct impact of disasters on mental health. Forced displacement, economic hardship, and societal matrix disturbance can predispose survivors – especially the most vulnerable – to longer-term and indirect mental health morbidity. In some cases, there may be persistent, even transgenerational morbidity.2,3 Disasters also have important systemic effects, especially in less well-developed systems, where disasters cause acuteon-chronic failures. The ethical handicap is that pressured systems fail exactly where the most vulnerable need them intact. Indeed, in disasters, mental health services are likely to fail early.2–4 Disaster Psychiatry is a branch dedicated to preventing, preparing for, and responding to the mental health consequences of disasters. It relies on a range of evidence-based interventions designed to address the acute response to disasters, but more importantly, to address future disasters by prevention and preparedness. Acute disaster response refers to supporting individuals and the wider system at times of crisis. It is well covered by guidelines by the WHO/IASC, the Sphere, RCPsych, APA, and the World Psychiatric Association, Section on Disaster Psychiatry.5 Beyond practical support and good clinical care, several well-supported interventions deal with the clinical sequelae of disasters. A key intervention is Psychological First Aid (PFA), which focuses on providing immediate and practical support to individuals following a disaster. Among others, effective therapeutic interventions include Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which has emerged as a gold standard for treating PTSD in meta-research, and Exposure Therapy (ET) which has lately been enhanced by XR and AI integration. To minimize the escalation of disaster-related psychopathology, early intervention, social support, and good access to mental health services are critical. Supporting the wider system before, during, and after disasters includes psychoeducation and support for front-line responders, advising decision-makers, facilitating coordination and effective communication between
{"title":"Disaster Psychiatry: An urgent field in psychiatry posing a pertinent question.","authors":"Nikos Christodoulou","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.022","DOIUrl":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disasters, both natural and man-made, impose a significant burden on the mental health of individuals, communities, and societies. The frequency and intensity of disasters are increasing; 3–4fold compared to the last century, with 400–500 significant disasters/year, affecting >1.5 billion people worldwide and costing 250–400 billion dollars/year. Most natural disasters are directly or indirectly linked to climate change, itself a natural disaster of human origin. Armed conflict is another human self-infliction; 59 state-based conflicts are currently active, the highest since WW2 (Uppsala Conflict Data Program-UCDP1).\u0000\u0000The mental health impact of disasters is multifaceted, influencing both immediate and long-term mental health outcomes. Acute stress, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represent just the direct impact of disasters on mental health. Forced displacement, economic hardship, and societal matrix disturbance can predispose survivors – especially the most vulnerable – to longer-term and indirect mental health morbidity. In some cases, there may be persistent, even transgenerational morbidity.2,3\u0000\u0000Disasters also have important systemic effects, especially in less well-developed systems, where disasters cause acuteon-chronic failures. The ethical handicap is that pressured systems fail exactly where the most vulnerable need them intact. Indeed, in disasters, mental health services are likely to fail early.2–4\u0000\u0000Disaster Psychiatry is a branch dedicated to preventing, preparing for, and responding to the mental health consequences of disasters. It relies on a range of evidence-based interventions designed to address the acute response to disasters, but more importantly, to address future disasters by prevention and preparedness. Acute disaster response refers to supporting individuals and the wider system at times of crisis. It is well covered by guidelines by the WHO/IASC, the Sphere, RCPsych, APA, and the World Psychiatric Association, Section on Disaster Psychiatry.5 Beyond practical support and good clinical care, several well-supported interventions deal with the clinical sequelae of disasters. A key intervention is Psychological First Aid (PFA), which focuses on providing immediate and practical support to individuals following a disaster. Among others, effective therapeutic interventions include Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which has emerged as a gold standard for treating PTSD in meta-research, and Exposure Therapy (ET) which has lately been enhanced by XR and AI integration.\u0000\u0000To minimize the escalation of disaster-related psychopathology, early intervention, social support, and good access to mental health services are critical. Supporting the wider system before, during, and after disasters includes psychoeducation and support for front-line responders, advising decision-makers, facilitating coordination and effective communication between","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":"265-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142838924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27Epub Date: 2024-12-03DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.020
Maria P Ntalouka, Agathi Karakosta, Diamanto Aretha, Alexandra Papaioannou, Vasileia Nyktari, Pelagia Chloropoulou, Eleni Koraki, Efstathia Pistioli, Paraskevi K Matsota, Petros Tzimas, Mary Gouva, Eleni M Arnaoutoglou
Anaesthesiologists actively involved with COVID-19 are at increased risk for post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSS). We assessed the PTSD and possible determinants of anaesthesiologists in COVID-19 referral hospitals in the post-COVID-19 era with the validated PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted among anaesthesiologists working in the 7 COVID-19 referral university/tertiary hospitals during November 2022 (post-COVID-19 era) in Greece. PCL-5 is a 20-item, 5-point Likert scale self-report measure, scored in two different ways to ensure a provisional diagnosis of PTSS. Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) explores 3 main dimensions of personality, whereas the Lie (L) scale serves as a measure of "dishonesty". Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predicting factors of PTSS using the stepwise forward method. One hundred doctors (response rate 85%) from 7 hospitals (72% females, median age 46 [33-51.5] years) participated. The overall Cronbach's alpha for PCL-5 was 0.946. According to each scoring, 18% and 23% of responders were diagnosed with PTSS, respectively, while 7% were classified as suffering from probable PTSD. Interestingly, children (OR=0.17, p=0.048) and the satisfaction with job position (OR=0.211, p=0.024) exhibited a protective effect against PTSS. On the other hand, family obligations were identified as an aggravating factor (OR=4.274, p=0.026). Concerning personality traits, only neuroticism was identified as a statistically significant independent factor predicting PTSS (OR=1.524, p=0.001). Finally, job ranking was also a statistically significant independent factor predicting PTSS, with a 3 times risk augmentation for each level in the job hierarchy (from Residents towards Academics) (OR=3.034, p=0.022). In the post-COVID-19 era, up to 23% of Greek anaesthesiologists working in referral hospitals suffered from PTSS. Children and job satisfaction exhibited a protective role in contrast to higher ranks of the job hierarchy.
{"title":"Greek anaesthesiologists' post-traumatic stress syndrome in the post COVID-19 era: An observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study from COVID-19 referral, university/tertiary hospitals.","authors":"Maria P Ntalouka, Agathi Karakosta, Diamanto Aretha, Alexandra Papaioannou, Vasileia Nyktari, Pelagia Chloropoulou, Eleni Koraki, Efstathia Pistioli, Paraskevi K Matsota, Petros Tzimas, Mary Gouva, Eleni M Arnaoutoglou","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.020","DOIUrl":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaesthesiologists actively involved with COVID-19 are at increased risk for post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSS). We assessed the PTSD and possible determinants of anaesthesiologists in COVID-19 referral hospitals in the post-COVID-19 era with the validated PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted among anaesthesiologists working in the 7 COVID-19 referral university/tertiary hospitals during November 2022 (post-COVID-19 era) in Greece. PCL-5 is a 20-item, 5-point Likert scale self-report measure, scored in two different ways to ensure a provisional diagnosis of PTSS. Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) explores 3 main dimensions of personality, whereas the Lie (L) scale serves as a measure of \"dishonesty\". Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predicting factors of PTSS using the stepwise forward method. One hundred doctors (response rate 85%) from 7 hospitals (72% females, median age 46 [33-51.5] years) participated. The overall Cronbach's alpha for PCL-5 was 0.946. According to each scoring, 18% and 23% of responders were diagnosed with PTSS, respectively, while 7% were classified as suffering from probable PTSD. Interestingly, children (OR=0.17, p=0.048) and the satisfaction with job position (OR=0.211, p=0.024) exhibited a protective effect against PTSS. On the other hand, family obligations were identified as an aggravating factor (OR=4.274, p=0.026). Concerning personality traits, only neuroticism was identified as a statistically significant independent factor predicting PTSS (OR=1.524, p=0.001). Finally, job ranking was also a statistically significant independent factor predicting PTSS, with a 3 times risk augmentation for each level in the job hierarchy (from Residents towards Academics) (OR=3.034, p=0.022). In the post-COVID-19 era, up to 23% of Greek anaesthesiologists working in referral hospitals suffered from PTSS. Children and job satisfaction exhibited a protective role in contrast to higher ranks of the job hierarchy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":"293-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27Epub Date: 2024-09-18DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.014
Maria Karapatsia, Maria Evangelia Antoniadou, Chara Tzavara, Ioannis Michopoulos, Fragiskos Gonidakis
Binge eating disorder (BED), the most prevalent eating disorder, carries significant physical and psychological consequences. Therefore, there is a continuous need to assess binge eating symptomatology and evaluate the effectiveness of various therapeutic interventions. The Binge Eating Scale (BES), which is a self-administered questionnaire, is widely used to assess binge eating in obese people. It examines the person' s experience of binge eating and the emotional, cognitive, and behavioural symptoms associated with it. The purpose of the present study was to translate and adapt BES in Greek, as well as to assess the factorial structure of BES and evaluate its psychometric properties. A sample of 160 participants (90% females) with a mean age of 40.7 years (SD=11.5 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) 37.5kg/m2 (SD=9.2kg/m2) completed the BES and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was carried out to assess the construct validity of the BES in a sample of patients with BED according to DSM-5 who came for therapy at the Eating Disorders Unit at Eginition Hospital and the day center "Anasa". The two-factor structure fits the data best. Regarding internal consistency, the results were acceptable, with Cronbach' s alpha equal to 0.78. The BES has high significant correlations with the Eating Concern, Weight Concern, and Shape Concern subscales and the Global Score of EDE-Q, but not with the Restrain subscale. Also, BES has correlations with the specific EDE-Q questions about the frequency of objective and subjective binge eating episodes. A high correlation was obtained with the measure of ΒΜΙ too. The Greek version of BES is a valid and reliable scale to evaluate binge eating in a clinical population diagnosed with BED.
{"title":"Validation of the Greek version of the Binge Eating Scale in a sample of binge eating disorder patients.","authors":"Maria Karapatsia, Maria Evangelia Antoniadou, Chara Tzavara, Ioannis Michopoulos, Fragiskos Gonidakis","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.014","DOIUrl":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Binge eating disorder (BED), the most prevalent eating disorder, carries significant physical and psychological consequences. Therefore, there is a continuous need to assess binge eating symptomatology and evaluate the effectiveness of various therapeutic interventions. The Binge Eating Scale (BES), which is a self-administered questionnaire, is widely used to assess binge eating in obese people. It examines the person' s experience of binge eating and the emotional, cognitive, and behavioural symptoms associated with it. The purpose of the present study was to translate and adapt BES in Greek, as well as to assess the factorial structure of BES and evaluate its psychometric properties. A sample of 160 participants (90% females) with a mean age of 40.7 years (SD=11.5 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) 37.5kg/m2 (SD=9.2kg/m2) completed the BES and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was carried out to assess the construct validity of the BES in a sample of patients with BED according to DSM-5 who came for therapy at the Eating Disorders Unit at Eginition Hospital and the day center \"Anasa\". The two-factor structure fits the data best. Regarding internal consistency, the results were acceptable, with Cronbach' s alpha equal to 0.78. The BES has high significant correlations with the Eating Concern, Weight Concern, and Shape Concern subscales and the Global Score of EDE-Q, but not with the Restrain subscale. Also, BES has correlations with the specific EDE-Q questions about the frequency of objective and subjective binge eating episodes. A high correlation was obtained with the measure of ΒΜΙ too. The Greek version of BES is a valid and reliable scale to evaluate binge eating in a clinical population diagnosed with BED.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":"303-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142352613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
People who suffer from severe mental health disorders are also at high risk of developing other serious health problems. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors combined with low self-care and low health literacy among people with severe mental health disorders highlight the need to design health promotion interventions in this population group. A qualitative study was carried out with the aim of investigating the perceptions among mental health professionals on the health promotion needs of people with severe mental health disorders through the co-production approach. Two focus groups were conducted with 20 mental health professionals working in mental health community settings in Attica, Greece. The data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Regarding health promotion needs, four major themes emerged: 1) psycho-education, 2) self-care skills, 3) institutional interventions, and 4) experiential education. Concerning co-production in health promotion, three main themes emerged: 1) participatory process, 2) services evaluation, and 3) co-production training. The findings of the study provide valuable insights into the perceptions of mental health professionals and can be taken into account in contributing to the design and implementation of health promotion programs for people with severe mental health disorders.
{"title":"Mental health professionals' perceptions on health promotion needs among people with severe mental health disorders through the co-production approach.","authors":"Konstantinos Tsoukas, Gerasimos Kolaitis, Areti Lagiou, Evanthia Sakellari","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.021","DOIUrl":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People who suffer from severe mental health disorders are also at high risk of developing other serious health problems. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors combined with low self-care and low health literacy among people with severe mental health disorders highlight the need to design health promotion interventions in this population group. A qualitative study was carried out with the aim of investigating the perceptions among mental health professionals on the health promotion needs of people with severe mental health disorders through the co-production approach. Two focus groups were conducted with 20 mental health professionals working in mental health community settings in Attica, Greece. The data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Regarding health promotion needs, four major themes emerged: 1) psycho-education, 2) self-care skills, 3) institutional interventions, and 4) experiential education. Concerning co-production in health promotion, three main themes emerged: 1) participatory process, 2) services evaluation, and 3) co-production training. The findings of the study provide valuable insights into the perceptions of mental health professionals and can be taken into account in contributing to the design and implementation of health promotion programs for people with severe mental health disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":"324-332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-15DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.023
Despοina Deli, George Tsouvelas, Dimitrios Roukas, Manolis Mentis
The current number of dementia cases in Europe stands at 7.7 million, a figure projected to double by 2050. Caregivers of individuals with dementia experience a heightened burden compared to those caring for other chronically ill individuals, increasing the risk of depression and stress disorders. This systematic literature review, following PRISMA guidelines, explores the prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms in dementia caregivers. Searches in academic databases, restricted to studies from the last 15 years, identified 85 articles with 16 meeting the inclusion criteria. Results indicate significant caregiver burden, diminished self-reported quality of life, and a propensity for clinical depression. Depression and anxiety symptoms were more pronounced among female caregivers. Caregiver depression correlated with increased emergency department utilization by dementia patients, with a surge in depressive symptoms reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Caregiving for dementia patients was associated with burnout, adversely impacting caregiver quality of life. Depression and anxiety symptoms in caregivers correlated with substance use. Sociodemographic variables, including low socioeconomic status, high urbanization levels, and older age, were associated with caregiver depression. Caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease reported higher anxiety, burden, and depression scores compared to those assisting individuals with other dementias, particularly when neuropsychiatric symptoms were evident. The identification of the factors that are linked to the mental burden of caregivers allows mental health professionals to enhance symptom detection and provide tailored support, ultimately alleviating caregiver burden and improving dementia care quality. Systematic professional assistance and training opportunities through health policies can effectively alleviate caregiver burden.
{"title":"A systematic review of depressive and anxiety symptoms in caregivers of dementia patients.","authors":"Despοina Deli, George Tsouvelas, Dimitrios Roukas, Manolis Mentis","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2024.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current number of dementia cases in Europe stands at 7.7 million, a figure projected to double by 2050. Caregivers of individuals with dementia experience a heightened burden compared to those caring for other chronically ill individuals, increasing the risk of depression and stress disorders. This systematic literature review, following PRISMA guidelines, explores the prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms in dementia caregivers. Searches in academic databases, restricted to studies from the last 15 years, identified 85 articles with 16 meeting the inclusion criteria. Results indicate significant caregiver burden, diminished self-reported quality of life, and a propensity for clinical depression. Depression and anxiety symptoms were more pronounced among female caregivers. Caregiver depression correlated with increased emergency department utilization by dementia patients, with a surge in depressive symptoms reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Caregiving for dementia patients was associated with burnout, adversely impacting caregiver quality of life. Depression and anxiety symptoms in caregivers correlated with substance use. Sociodemographic variables, including low socioeconomic status, high urbanization levels, and older age, were associated with caregiver depression. Caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease reported higher anxiety, burden, and depression scores compared to those assisting individuals with other dementias, particularly when neuropsychiatric symptoms were evident. The identification of the factors that are linked to the mental burden of caregivers allows mental health professionals to enhance symptom detection and provide tailored support, ultimately alleviating caregiver burden and improving dementia care quality. Systematic professional assistance and training opportunities through health policies can effectively alleviate caregiver burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142838980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-15DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.026
Chrysoula Vatikioti, Kalliopi Triantafyllou, Chara Tzavara, Thomas Paparrigopoulos
In recent decades, a growing body of research has emphasized the unique nature of substance abuse among women, necessitating a gender-specific approach and thus individualized therapeutic interventions.The purpose of this study, based on the existential approach, was to examine whether symptoms of several behavioral addictions (shopping, sex, gambling and betting, eating) and alcohol use disorder correlate with death anxiety, lack of meaning in life, and levels of mental resilience in a convenience sample of women. A total of 3,176 women participated in this online study and completed a demographic characteristics questionnaire, the Shorter PROMIS Questionnaire (SPQ), the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and the Death Anxiety Scale (DAS).The results showed a significant negative correlation between the "Presence of meaning in life" subscale and all addiction symptoms subscales (shopping, p<0.001; sex, p<0.001; gambling and betting, p=0.006; food, p<0.001, and alcohol use, p<0.001). Conversely, the "Search for meaning in life" subscale showed a significant positive correlation with all addiction symptoms subscales (shopping, sex, gambling and betting, food, and alcohol use, p<0.001). Resilience emerged as a protective factor, showing significant negative correlations with symptoms of sex addiction (p<0.001), alcohol use disorder (p<0.001), shopping addiction (p<0.001), and food addiction (p<0.001) addiction, although the correlation coefficients were small (ranging from -0.07 to -0.21), indicating a weak or no correlation. Participants with higher death anxiety also showed more symptoms of gambling and betting addiction (p<0.001), shopping addiction (p<0.001), and food addiction (p<0.001). Women who were married and had a university degree showed fewer symptoms of sex addiction (â = - 0.079; p = 0.004 / â = - 0.118; p = 0.001), alcohol use disorder (â = -0.105; p = 0.011 / â = -0.158; p = 0.004), and gambling addiction (â = -0.055; p < 0.001 / â = -0.091; p < 0.001), while women aged 18-25 displayed significantly lower symptoms of shopping and food addiction. Marriage and higher levels of education emerged as protective factors against certain types of addictive behaviors. In conclusion, this research showed a meaningful relationship between the lack of meaning in life and death anxiety with the manifestation of behavioral addiction symptoms and alcohol use. Also, the presence of mental resilience may act as a protective factor against gambling and betting addiction, shopping addiction, and food addiction, but not against sex addiction and alcohol use disorder.
{"title":"Death anxiety, life's meaninglessness, and mental resilience among women with symptoms of behavioral addictions and alcohol use disorder: Using the existential approach.","authors":"Chrysoula Vatikioti, Kalliopi Triantafyllou, Chara Tzavara, Thomas Paparrigopoulos","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2024.026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent decades, a growing body of research has emphasized the unique nature of substance abuse among women, necessitating a gender-specific approach and thus individualized therapeutic interventions.The purpose of this study, based on the existential approach, was to examine whether symptoms of several behavioral addictions (shopping, sex, gambling and betting, eating) and alcohol use disorder correlate with death anxiety, lack of meaning in life, and levels of mental resilience in a convenience sample of women. A total of 3,176 women participated in this online study and completed a demographic characteristics questionnaire, the Shorter PROMIS Questionnaire (SPQ), the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and the Death Anxiety Scale (DAS).The results showed a significant negative correlation between the \"Presence of meaning in life\" subscale and all addiction symptoms subscales (shopping, p<0.001; sex, p<0.001; gambling and betting, p=0.006; food, p<0.001, and alcohol use, p<0.001). Conversely, the \"Search for meaning in life\" subscale showed a significant positive correlation with all addiction symptoms subscales (shopping, sex, gambling and betting, food, and alcohol use, p<0.001). Resilience emerged as a protective factor, showing significant negative correlations with symptoms of sex addiction (p<0.001), alcohol use disorder (p<0.001), shopping addiction (p<0.001), and food addiction (p<0.001) addiction, although the correlation coefficients were small (ranging from -0.07 to -0.21), indicating a weak or no correlation. Participants with higher death anxiety also showed more symptoms of gambling and betting addiction (p<0.001), shopping addiction (p<0.001), and food addiction (p<0.001). Women who were married and had a university degree showed fewer symptoms of sex addiction (â = - 0.079; p = 0.004 / â = - 0.118; p = 0.001), alcohol use disorder (â = -0.105; p = 0.011 / â = -0.158; p = 0.004), and gambling addiction (â = -0.055; p < 0.001 / â = -0.091; p < 0.001), while women aged 18-25 displayed significantly lower symptoms of shopping and food addiction. Marriage and higher levels of education emerged as protective factors against certain types of addictive behaviors. In conclusion, this research showed a meaningful relationship between the lack of meaning in life and death anxiety with the manifestation of behavioral addiction symptoms and alcohol use. Also, the presence of mental resilience may act as a protective factor against gambling and betting addiction, shopping addiction, and food addiction, but not against sex addiction and alcohol use disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142838981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-15DOI: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.025
Antonis Tsionis, Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, George Konstantakopoulos
The COVID-19 pandemic emerged suddenly, profoundly impacting the lives of us all, including mental health workers (MHW). This unprecedented crisis introduced significant challenges for MHW, exposing them to increased risks of psychological distress. This systematic review aims to evaluate the psychopathological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on MHW. Additionally, it seeks to explore factors-social, regional, occupational, and others-influencing these effects. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 2621 citations were screened, with 29 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for analysis. Our review focused exclusively on studies utilizing validated measurement tools to ensure reliability. Our findings revealed a high prevalence of anxiety, depression, stress, trauma-related disorders, and burnout among mental health nurses and other MHW during the COVID-19 pandemic, with significant variations based on regional, occupational, gender, and other demographic factors. Depressive symptoms ranged from 16.8% to 52.2%, and anxiety levels varied from 9.7% to 63% among MHW. Interestingly, MHW exhibited lower rates of depression and anxiety compared to other healthcare workers and the general population, possibly indicating higher resilience. Factors such as younger age, female gender, profession, work setting, fear of COVID-19, and workload were associated with increased psychological distress. Our review also underscores the need for more systematically accurate trauma research, particularly in how trauma is defined and assessed during global crises. While the consistency in study findings highlights the considerable effect of the pandemic, we observed differences that suggest the influence of multiple interacting factors. The lack of longitudinal studies and comparative data limits the ability to determine changes over time and differences with other groups. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the mental health of those responsible for caring for the mental health of others, with considerable variations influenced by multiple interacting factors. Our findings highlight the critical need for protective protocols and psychological support systems to mitigate adverse effects on MHW during global crises. The variance in impact across different countries, in relation to local, political, cultural, and other factors, provides a foundation for future research.
{"title":"Under pressure: A systematic review of the mental health impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health workers.","authors":"Antonis Tsionis, Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, George Konstantakopoulos","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2024.025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic emerged suddenly, profoundly impacting the lives of us all, including mental health workers (MHW). This unprecedented crisis introduced significant challenges for MHW, exposing them to increased risks of psychological distress. This systematic review aims to evaluate the psychopathological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on MHW. Additionally, it seeks to explore factors-social, regional, occupational, and others-influencing these effects. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 2621 citations were screened, with 29 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for analysis. Our review focused exclusively on studies utilizing validated measurement tools to ensure reliability. Our findings revealed a high prevalence of anxiety, depression, stress, trauma-related disorders, and burnout among mental health nurses and other MHW during the COVID-19 pandemic, with significant variations based on regional, occupational, gender, and other demographic factors. Depressive symptoms ranged from 16.8% to 52.2%, and anxiety levels varied from 9.7% to 63% among MHW. Interestingly, MHW exhibited lower rates of depression and anxiety compared to other healthcare workers and the general population, possibly indicating higher resilience. Factors such as younger age, female gender, profession, work setting, fear of COVID-19, and workload were associated with increased psychological distress. Our review also underscores the need for more systematically accurate trauma research, particularly in how trauma is defined and assessed during global crises. While the consistency in study findings highlights the considerable effect of the pandemic, we observed differences that suggest the influence of multiple interacting factors. The lack of longitudinal studies and comparative data limits the ability to determine changes over time and differences with other groups. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the mental health of those responsible for caring for the mental health of others, with considerable variations influenced by multiple interacting factors. Our findings highlight the critical need for protective protocols and psychological support systems to mitigate adverse effects on MHW during global crises. The variance in impact across different countries, in relation to local, political, cultural, and other factors, provides a foundation for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142838926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}