Characterizing pulmonary rehabilitation referrals from primary care

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107822
{"title":"Characterizing pulmonary rehabilitation referrals from primary care","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Supporting referral to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) from primary care for people with chronic lung disease could improve equity of access. Understanding who is referred to PR from primary care, and by whom, could inform development of strategies to increase awareness of and referral to PR for people with chronic respiratory disease. We aimed to quantify the proportion of patients referred to PR from primary care in an Australian metropolitan setting; and to identify characteristic features of patients and referrers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, single-site, audit of referrals was undertaken. Corresponding patient medical records were reviewed for referral details, patient demographics and baseline PR assessment measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between January 2020 and December 2023 658 referrals to PR were received of which 6.2 % (n = 41) originated from a primary care source (98 % general practice; 2 % allied health). People referred to PR from primary care were typically diagnosed with COPD (71 %), were female (59 %), had moderate disease severity (mean(SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s 70(26) %predicted) and had mild symptoms (53 % modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea score 0 or 1) and modest functional impairment (6-min walk distance 410(121) meters). Just 4 of 36 primary care practitioners referred more than one patient.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this audit the proportion of people referred to PR from primary care was very low. Processes to support the referral of more patients from primary care to PR, across the spectrum of chronic respiratory disease, remain a priority for improving access to this well-established treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095461112400297X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Supporting referral to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) from primary care for people with chronic lung disease could improve equity of access. Understanding who is referred to PR from primary care, and by whom, could inform development of strategies to increase awareness of and referral to PR for people with chronic respiratory disease. We aimed to quantify the proportion of patients referred to PR from primary care in an Australian metropolitan setting; and to identify characteristic features of patients and referrers.

Methods

A retrospective, single-site, audit of referrals was undertaken. Corresponding patient medical records were reviewed for referral details, patient demographics and baseline PR assessment measures.

Results

Between January 2020 and December 2023 658 referrals to PR were received of which 6.2 % (n = 41) originated from a primary care source (98 % general practice; 2 % allied health). People referred to PR from primary care were typically diagnosed with COPD (71 %), were female (59 %), had moderate disease severity (mean(SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s 70(26) %predicted) and had mild symptoms (53 % modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea score 0 or 1) and modest functional impairment (6-min walk distance 410(121) meters). Just 4 of 36 primary care practitioners referred more than one patient.

Conclusion

In this audit the proportion of people referred to PR from primary care was very low. Processes to support the referral of more patients from primary care to PR, across the spectrum of chronic respiratory disease, remain a priority for improving access to this well-established treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从基层医疗机构转诊的肺康复患者的特点。
背景:支持慢性肺病患者从初级保健转诊至肺康复(PR)可提高就诊的公平性。了解哪些人以及由哪些人从初级保健转诊到肺康复,可以为制定提高慢性呼吸系统疾病患者对肺康复的认识和转诊的策略提供参考。我们的目标是量化澳大利亚大都市中由初级医疗转诊至 PR 的患者比例,并确定患者和转诊者的特征:方法:我们对转诊患者进行了一次单一地点的回顾性审计。结果:在 2020 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,转诊病人和转诊人的特征发生了变化:2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间,共收到 658 例转诊到 PR 的患者,其中 6.2% (n=41) 来自初级医疗机构(98% 为全科医生;2% 为联合医疗机构)。从初级医疗机构转介到 PR 的患者通常被诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病(71%),女性(59%),疾病严重程度中等(平均(标度)一秒钟用力呼气量为 70(26) % 预测值),症状轻微(53% 经修改的医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分为 0 或 1),功能受损程度适中(6 分钟步行距离为 410(121) 米)。在 36 名初级保健医生中,仅有 4 名医生转介了一名以上的患者:在本次审核中,从初级医疗机构转诊到 PR 的患者比例非常低。在各种慢性呼吸道疾病中,支持将更多患者从初级保健转诊至 PR 的流程仍是改善这一成熟治疗方法的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the acceptability of the changing model of care in cystic fibrosis Efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease and exercise pulmonary hypertension Epistaxis in COVID positive ICU patients, implications, and future interventions Prognostic Role of Pleural Fluid SUVpeak Value obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion. β-Blockers and Asthma: Surprising findings from the FAERS database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1