{"title":"Ratings of perceived effort during expiratory pressure tasks in healthy adults","authors":"Avery E. Dakin , Michelle S. Troche","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) is a resistance exercise used to improve maximal expiratory pressure and airway protective functions (cough and swallow) in clinical populations. Although ratings of perceived exertion/effort (RPE) are commonly used in exercise prescription and monitoring, they have been underutilized in EMST and require investigation. Our study aims were to: (1) examine how healthy adults rate their effort using the EMST-150 device and MicroRPM respiratory manometer; (2) assess variability in RPE; and (3) compare RPE and relative expiratory pressures obtained from the two devices.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Healthy adults completed thirty randomized expiratory maneuvers into a respiratory manometer and an EMST-150 device. RPE was measured using the Borg Category Ratio Scale. Linear mixed multilevel models were used for Aim 1 and 3, and coefficient of variation was used for Aim 2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty healthy adults (Median age: 24.5 years) participated. Results demonstrated a strong positive relationship between resistive load and perceived effort when using both devices. Intra-individual variability in perceived effort decreased as resistive load increased. Participants produced an average of 18.2 % lower expiratory pressure when blowing into the manometer (relative to their maximum) than when blowing into the EMST device.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our results support the utilization of RPE in EMST research and clinical practice. The addition of RPE as a measure of intensity during respiratory exercise prescription may be used in future research to help refine EMST protocols and improve rehabilitation outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"331 ","pages":"Article 104356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824001496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) is a resistance exercise used to improve maximal expiratory pressure and airway protective functions (cough and swallow) in clinical populations. Although ratings of perceived exertion/effort (RPE) are commonly used in exercise prescription and monitoring, they have been underutilized in EMST and require investigation. Our study aims were to: (1) examine how healthy adults rate their effort using the EMST-150 device and MicroRPM respiratory manometer; (2) assess variability in RPE; and (3) compare RPE and relative expiratory pressures obtained from the two devices.
Method
Healthy adults completed thirty randomized expiratory maneuvers into a respiratory manometer and an EMST-150 device. RPE was measured using the Borg Category Ratio Scale. Linear mixed multilevel models were used for Aim 1 and 3, and coefficient of variation was used for Aim 2.
Results
Twenty healthy adults (Median age: 24.5 years) participated. Results demonstrated a strong positive relationship between resistive load and perceived effort when using both devices. Intra-individual variability in perceived effort decreased as resistive load increased. Participants produced an average of 18.2 % lower expiratory pressure when blowing into the manometer (relative to their maximum) than when blowing into the EMST device.
Discussion
Our results support the utilization of RPE in EMST research and clinical practice. The addition of RPE as a measure of intensity during respiratory exercise prescription may be used in future research to help refine EMST protocols and improve rehabilitation outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense.
Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as:
-Mechanics of breathing-
Gas exchange and acid-base balance-
Respiration at rest and exercise-
Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen-
Embryonic and adult respiration-
Comparative respiratory physiology.
Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.