Efficacy and safety of a preventive strategy against tuberculosis in liver transplantation recipients including the treatment of latent infection with moxifloxacin.
Marina Fayos, Jose Tiago Silva, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Alessandro Visentin, Carmelo Loinaz, Alejandro Manrique-Municio, José María Caso, Jesús González-Olmedo, Isabel Rodríguez-Góncer, Francisco López-Medrano, Carlos Lumbreras, José María Aguado, Rafael San-Juan
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of a preventive strategy against tuberculosis in liver transplantation recipients including the treatment of latent infection with moxifloxacin.","authors":"Marina Fayos, Jose Tiago Silva, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Alessandro Visentin, Carmelo Loinaz, Alejandro Manrique-Municio, José María Caso, Jesús González-Olmedo, Isabel Rodríguez-Góncer, Francisco López-Medrano, Carlos Lumbreras, José María Aguado, Rafael San-Juan","doi":"10.1111/tid.14382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventive management of tuberculosis in liver transplantation (LT) is challenging due to difficulties in detecting and treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of a screening strategy for LTBI with the inclusion of moxifloxacin as treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective single-center study of all LTs performed between 2016 and 2019 with a minimum 4-year follow-up and a standardized protocol for the evaluation of LTBI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pretransplant LTBI screening was performed in 191/218 (87.6%) patients, and LTBI was diagnosed in 27.2% of them. Treatment for LTBI was administered to 71.2% of the patients and included moxifloxacin in 75.6% of the cases. After a median follow-up of 1628 days, no cases of active tuberculosis occurred among moxifloxacin-treated patients. The incidence of Clostridioides difficile (0.46 vs. 0.38 episodes/1000 transplant-days; p = .8) and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infection (0 vs. 0.7 episodes per 1000 transplant-days; p = .08) were not significantly higher in comparison to patients who did not receive moxifloxacin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A preventive strategy based on systematic LTBI screening and moxifloxacin treatment before LT in positive cases appears safe and effective in preventing the development of tuberculosis in LT recipients. However, our findings are limited by a small sample size; thus, larger studies are required to validate our observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Preventive management of tuberculosis in liver transplantation (LT) is challenging due to difficulties in detecting and treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of a screening strategy for LTBI with the inclusion of moxifloxacin as treatment.
Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study of all LTs performed between 2016 and 2019 with a minimum 4-year follow-up and a standardized protocol for the evaluation of LTBI.
Results: Pretransplant LTBI screening was performed in 191/218 (87.6%) patients, and LTBI was diagnosed in 27.2% of them. Treatment for LTBI was administered to 71.2% of the patients and included moxifloxacin in 75.6% of the cases. After a median follow-up of 1628 days, no cases of active tuberculosis occurred among moxifloxacin-treated patients. The incidence of Clostridioides difficile (0.46 vs. 0.38 episodes/1000 transplant-days; p = .8) and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infection (0 vs. 0.7 episodes per 1000 transplant-days; p = .08) were not significantly higher in comparison to patients who did not receive moxifloxacin.
Conclusion: A preventive strategy based on systematic LTBI screening and moxifloxacin treatment before LT in positive cases appears safe and effective in preventing the development of tuberculosis in LT recipients. However, our findings are limited by a small sample size; thus, larger studies are required to validate our observations.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.