Common efficacy measures and measurement instruments lead to more meaningful clinical research.

Q4 Medicine Ugeskrift for laeger Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.61409/V12230799
Dorthe B Berthelsen, Linea Rishøj Thorlacius, Bente Villumsen, Gregor Be Jemec, Robin Christensen
{"title":"Common efficacy measures and measurement instruments lead to more meaningful clinical research.","authors":"Dorthe B Berthelsen, Linea Rishøj Thorlacius, Bente Villumsen, Gregor Be Jemec, Robin Christensen","doi":"10.61409/V12230799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review describes that a core outcome set (COS) represents a consensus-based minimum set of outcomes to be collected and reported in clinical trials involving a particular disease or population. A COS serves as a guideline for global consensus on which outcome domains should be collected in all clinical trials. After defining what to measure, it becomes crucial to reach consensus on how to measure it. This includes the selection of appropriate outcome measurement instruments with credible measurement properties and interpretable thresholds of meaning.</p>","PeriodicalId":23428,"journal":{"name":"Ugeskrift for laeger","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ugeskrift for laeger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/V12230799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review describes that a core outcome set (COS) represents a consensus-based minimum set of outcomes to be collected and reported in clinical trials involving a particular disease or population. A COS serves as a guideline for global consensus on which outcome domains should be collected in all clinical trials. After defining what to measure, it becomes crucial to reach consensus on how to measure it. This includes the selection of appropriate outcome measurement instruments with credible measurement properties and interpretable thresholds of meaning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通用的疗效测量方法和测量工具有助于开展更有意义的临床研究。
本综述指出,核心结果集(COS)是在涉及特定疾病或人群的临床试验中收集和报告的一套基于共识的最低结果集。核心结果集是全球就所有临床试验应收集哪些结果领域达成共识的指南。在确定要测量什么之后,就如何测量达成共识就变得至关重要。这包括选择具有可信测量特性和可解释意义阈值的适当结果测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ugeskrift for laeger
Ugeskrift for laeger Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
345
期刊介绍: The Ulster Medical Journal is an international general medical journal with contributions on all areas of medical and surgical specialties relevant to a general medical readership. It retains a focus on material relevant to the health of the Northern Ireland population. The Honorary Editor would welcome offers of papers for publication. Prospective authors are invited to read the notice to contributors.
期刊最新文献
Ictal asystole is a rare complication of epilepsy. Intravenous iron preoperatively for woman with severe anaemia. Pneumoperitoneum ved perforeret miltabsces. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Social-motional challenges in children of mothers with postpartum depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1