Telemedical Direction to Optimize Resource Utilization in a Rural Emergency Medical Services System.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5811/westjem.18427
Ramesh Karra, Amber D Rice, Aileen Hardcastle, Justin V Lara, Adrienne Hollen, Melody Glenn, Rachel Munn, Philipp Hannan, Brittany Arcaris, Daniel Derksen, Daniel W Spaite, Joshua B Gaither
{"title":"Telemedical Direction to Optimize Resource Utilization in a Rural Emergency Medical Services System.","authors":"Ramesh Karra, Amber D Rice, Aileen Hardcastle, Justin V Lara, Adrienne Hollen, Melody Glenn, Rachel Munn, Philipp Hannan, Brittany Arcaris, Daniel Derksen, Daniel W Spaite, Joshua B Gaither","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine remains an underused tool in rural emergency medical servces (EMS) systems. Rural emergency medical technicians (EMT) and paramedics cite concerns that telemedicine could increase Advanced Life Support (ALS) transports, extend on-scene times, and face challenges related to connectivity as barriers to implementation. Our aim in this project was to implement a telemedicine system in a rural EMS setting and assess the impact of telemedicine on EMS management of patients with chest pain while evaluating some of the perceived barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a mixed-methods, retrospective review of quality assurance data collected prior to and after implementation of a telemedicine program targeting patients with chest pain. We compared quantitative data from the 12-month pre-implementation phase to data from 15 months post-implementation. Patients were included if they had a chief complaint of chest pain or a 12-lead electrocardiogram had been obtained. The primary outcome was the rate of ALS transport before and after program implementation. Secondary outcomes included EMS call response times and EMS agency performance on quality improvement benchmarks. Qualitative data were also collected after each telemedicine encounter to evaluate paramedic/EMT and EMS physician perception of call quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The telemedicine pilot project was implemented in September 2020. Overall, there were 58 successful encounters. For this analysis, we included 38 patients in both the pre-implementation period (September 9, 2019-September 10, 2020) and the post-implementation period (September 11, 2020-December 5, 2021). Among this population, the ALS transport rate was 42% before and 45% after implementation (odds ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.45-2.76). The EMS median out-of-service times were 47 minutes before, and 33 minutes after (<i>P</i> = 0.07). Overall, 64% of paramedics/EMTs and 89% of EMS physicians rated the telemedicine call quality as \"good.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this rural EMS system, a telehealth platform was successfully used to connect paramedics/EMTs to board-certified EMS physicians over a 15-month period. Telemedicine use did not alter rates of ALS transports and did not increase on-scene time. The majority of paramedics/EMTs and EMS physicians rated the quality of the telemedicine connection as \"good.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"777-783"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine remains an underused tool in rural emergency medical servces (EMS) systems. Rural emergency medical technicians (EMT) and paramedics cite concerns that telemedicine could increase Advanced Life Support (ALS) transports, extend on-scene times, and face challenges related to connectivity as barriers to implementation. Our aim in this project was to implement a telemedicine system in a rural EMS setting and assess the impact of telemedicine on EMS management of patients with chest pain while evaluating some of the perceived barriers.

Methods: This study was a mixed-methods, retrospective review of quality assurance data collected prior to and after implementation of a telemedicine program targeting patients with chest pain. We compared quantitative data from the 12-month pre-implementation phase to data from 15 months post-implementation. Patients were included if they had a chief complaint of chest pain or a 12-lead electrocardiogram had been obtained. The primary outcome was the rate of ALS transport before and after program implementation. Secondary outcomes included EMS call response times and EMS agency performance on quality improvement benchmarks. Qualitative data were also collected after each telemedicine encounter to evaluate paramedic/EMT and EMS physician perception of call quality.

Results: The telemedicine pilot project was implemented in September 2020. Overall, there were 58 successful encounters. For this analysis, we included 38 patients in both the pre-implementation period (September 9, 2019-September 10, 2020) and the post-implementation period (September 11, 2020-December 5, 2021). Among this population, the ALS transport rate was 42% before and 45% after implementation (odds ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.45-2.76). The EMS median out-of-service times were 47 minutes before, and 33 minutes after (P = 0.07). Overall, 64% of paramedics/EMTs and 89% of EMS physicians rated the telemedicine call quality as "good."

Conclusion: In this rural EMS system, a telehealth platform was successfully used to connect paramedics/EMTs to board-certified EMS physicians over a 15-month period. Telemedicine use did not alter rates of ALS transports and did not increase on-scene time. The majority of paramedics/EMTs and EMS physicians rated the quality of the telemedicine connection as "good."

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在农村紧急医疗服务系统中优化资源利用的远程医疗指导。
背景:远程医疗在农村紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中仍是一种未得到充分利用的工具。农村急救医疗技术人员(EMT)和辅助医务人员担心远程医疗会增加高级生命支持(ALS)转运次数、延长现场时间,以及面临与连接有关的挑战,这些都是实施远程医疗的障碍。我们的目标是在农村急救环境中实施远程医疗系统,并评估远程医疗对胸痛患者急救管理的影响,同时评估一些感知到的障碍:本研究采用混合方法,对针对胸痛患者的远程医疗计划实施前后收集的质量保证数据进行了回顾性审查。我们将实施前 12 个月的定量数据与实施后 15 个月的数据进行了比较。如果患者主诉胸痛或已获得 12 导联心电图,则可纳入该计划。主要结果是计划实施前后的 ALS 转运率。次要结果包括紧急医疗服务呼叫响应时间和紧急医疗服务机构在质量改进基准方面的表现。在每次远程医疗会诊后还收集了定性数据,以评估辅助医务人员/急救车和急救医生对呼叫质量的看法:远程医疗试点项目于 2020 年 9 月实施。总体而言,共有 58 次成功会诊。在本次分析中,我们纳入了实施前(2019 年 9 月 9 日至 2020 年 9 月 10 日)和实施后(2020 年 9 月 11 日至 2021 年 12 月 5 日)的 38 名患者。在这些人群中,实施前和实施后的 ALS 转运率分别为 42% 和 45%(几率比 1.11;95% 置信区间 0.45-2.76)。实施前和实施后,急救服务中断时间的中位数分别为 47 分钟和 33 分钟(P = 0.07)。总体而言,64% 的护理人员/急救员和 89% 的急救医生将远程医疗呼叫质量评为 "良好":在这个农村急救系统中,远程医疗平台在 15 个月的时间里成功地将辅助医务人员/急救员与经过认证的急救医生连接起来。远程医疗的使用没有改变 ALS 转运率,也没有增加现场时间。大多数护理人员/急救员和急救医生将远程医疗连接的质量评为 "良好"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Prehospital Ultrasound Training on Simulated Paramedic Clinical Decision-Making. Interfacility Patient Transfers During COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed-Methods Study. Making A Difference: Launching a Multimodal, Resident-Run Social Emergency Medicine Program. Methadone Initiation in the Emergency Department for Opioid Use Disorder. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Sepsis in Adult Patients Meeting Two or More Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1