A Cross-Sectional Review of HIV Screening in High-Acuity Emergency Department Patients: A Missed Opportunity.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5811/westjem.18067
Jacqueline J Mahal, Fernando Gonzalez, Deirdre Kokasko, Ahava Muskat
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Review of HIV Screening in High-Acuity Emergency Department Patients: A Missed Opportunity.","authors":"Jacqueline J Mahal, Fernando Gonzalez, Deirdre Kokasko, Ahava Muskat","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department (ED) patients requiring immediate treatment often bypass a triage process that includes HIV screening. In this study we aimed to investigate the potential missed opportunity to screen these patients for HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted this cross-sectional study in a municipal ED over a six-week period between June-August 2019. The patient population in this study arrived in the ED as a pre-notification from prehospital services or designated by the ambulance or walk-in triage nurse as requiring immediate medical attention. Medical student researchers collected demographic data and categorized patients into three clinical groups (trauma, medical, psychiatric). They documented the patient's eligibility for HIV screening as determined by a physician and confirmed that the patient met criteria of clear mental status, controlled pain, stable vital signs, and ability to contribute to a medical history and physical examination. The student researchers did this at initial presentation and then again during the patient's ED stay of up to eight hours. The study outcomes measured the percentage of total patients within each clinical group (trauma, medical, psychiatric) able to engage in the HIV screening process upon arrival and during an eight-hour ED stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, 700 patients per month are announced on arrival via overhead page, indicating that they require immediate medical attention. During the six-week study, 205 patients (approximately 20% of total) were enrolled: 114 trauma; 56 medical; and 35 psychiatric presentations. The average patient age was 53; 60% of patients were male. Niney-eight (48%) patients were eligible for HIV screening within an eight-hour ED stay; 63 (31%) were able to be screened upon initial presentation and 35 (17%) in the first eight hours of their ED visit. Within medical and trauma subgroups, there was no significant difference in the proportion (36%) of patients that could be screened upon presentation. Among the psychiatric presentations, only five (14%) were able to be screened during their hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Triage protocols for high-acuity medico-surgical patients resulted in a missed opportunity to screen 48% of patients for HIV. Acute psychiatric patients represented a particular missed opportunity. We advocate for universal HIV screening, facilitated through electronic best practice advisories and a modified triage tailored to higher acuity patients. Implementing these changes would ensure that HIV screening is not overlooked in high-acuity ED patients, leading to early detection and timely interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) patients requiring immediate treatment often bypass a triage process that includes HIV screening. In this study we aimed to investigate the potential missed opportunity to screen these patients for HIV.

Methods: We conducted this cross-sectional study in a municipal ED over a six-week period between June-August 2019. The patient population in this study arrived in the ED as a pre-notification from prehospital services or designated by the ambulance or walk-in triage nurse as requiring immediate medical attention. Medical student researchers collected demographic data and categorized patients into three clinical groups (trauma, medical, psychiatric). They documented the patient's eligibility for HIV screening as determined by a physician and confirmed that the patient met criteria of clear mental status, controlled pain, stable vital signs, and ability to contribute to a medical history and physical examination. The student researchers did this at initial presentation and then again during the patient's ED stay of up to eight hours. The study outcomes measured the percentage of total patients within each clinical group (trauma, medical, psychiatric) able to engage in the HIV screening process upon arrival and during an eight-hour ED stay.

Results: On average, 700 patients per month are announced on arrival via overhead page, indicating that they require immediate medical attention. During the six-week study, 205 patients (approximately 20% of total) were enrolled: 114 trauma; 56 medical; and 35 psychiatric presentations. The average patient age was 53; 60% of patients were male. Niney-eight (48%) patients were eligible for HIV screening within an eight-hour ED stay; 63 (31%) were able to be screened upon initial presentation and 35 (17%) in the first eight hours of their ED visit. Within medical and trauma subgroups, there was no significant difference in the proportion (36%) of patients that could be screened upon presentation. Among the psychiatric presentations, only five (14%) were able to be screened during their hospital stay.

Conclusion: Triage protocols for high-acuity medico-surgical patients resulted in a missed opportunity to screen 48% of patients for HIV. Acute psychiatric patients represented a particular missed opportunity. We advocate for universal HIV screening, facilitated through electronic best practice advisories and a modified triage tailored to higher acuity patients. Implementing these changes would ensure that HIV screening is not overlooked in high-acuity ED patients, leading to early detection and timely interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对急诊科高危患者进行 HIV 筛查的横断面回顾:错失良机。
导言:急诊科(ED)中需要立即接受治疗的患者通常会绕过包括 HIV 筛查在内的分诊流程。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查这些患者可能错失的 HIV 筛查机会:我们在 2019 年 6 月至 8 月的六周时间内,在一个市级急诊室开展了这项横断面研究。本研究中的患者是根据院前服务的预先通知或救护车或步行分诊护士的指定到达急诊室的,需要立即就医。医科学生研究人员收集了人口统计学数据,并将患者分为三个临床组(创伤组、内科组和精神科组)。他们记录了由医生确定的患者接受 HIV 筛查的资格,并确认患者符合精神状态清晰、疼痛得到控制、生命体征稳定以及能够提供病史和体格检查的标准。学生研究人员在患者初次就诊时进行了这项工作,并在患者在急诊室逗留长达 8 小时期间再次进行了这项工作。研究结果衡量了每个临床组(创伤、内科、精神科)中能够在患者到达时和在急诊室停留八小时期间参与 HIV 筛查过程的患者总数的百分比:结果:平均每月有 700 名患者在到达急诊室时通过头顶的页面被告知需要立即就医。在为期六周的研究中,有 205 名患者(约占总数的 20%)加入了研究:其中外伤病人 114 人,内科病人 56 人,精神病人 35 人。患者平均年龄为 53 岁,60% 为男性。98名患者(48%)符合在急诊室就诊八小时内进行 HIV 筛查的条件;63 名患者(31%)在初次就诊时就能接受筛查,35 名患者(17%)在急诊室就诊的前八小时内就能接受筛查。在内科和创伤亚组别中,首次就诊就能接受筛查的患者比例(36%)没有明显差异。在精神病患者中,只有五人(14%)能在住院期间接受筛查:结论:对高危内外科病人的分诊方案导致 48% 的病人错过了筛查艾滋病毒的机会。急诊精神病患者尤其错失了筛查机会。我们主张通过电子最佳实践建议和针对高危重病人的修改分诊方案,普及艾滋病筛查。实施这些变革将确保急诊室高危患者不会忽视艾滋病筛查,从而及早发现并及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Prehospital Ultrasound Training on Simulated Paramedic Clinical Decision-Making. Interfacility Patient Transfers During COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed-Methods Study. Making A Difference: Launching a Multimodal, Resident-Run Social Emergency Medicine Program. Methadone Initiation in the Emergency Department for Opioid Use Disorder. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Sepsis in Adult Patients Meeting Two or More Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1