Dog Blood Type DEA 1 in Two Municipalities of Luanda Province of Angola (Sub-Saharan Africa).

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.3390/vetsci11090449
Ana C Silvestre-Ferreira, Hugo Vilhena, Ana C Oliveira, José R Mendoza, Maria Garcia Aura, Josep Pastor
{"title":"Dog Blood Type DEA 1 in Two Municipalities of Luanda Province of Angola (Sub-Saharan Africa).","authors":"Ana C Silvestre-Ferreira, Hugo Vilhena, Ana C Oliveira, José R Mendoza, Maria Garcia Aura, Josep Pastor","doi":"10.3390/vetsci11090449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In dogs, the risk of an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction at the first transfusion is negligible; however, mismatched transfusions may produce alloimmunization. To avoid fatal acute hemolytic reactions in subsequent blood transfusions, it is important to recognize blood groups and to blood type both the donor and the recipient. Prevalence of dog blood groups varies geographically and between breeds. Our aim was to determine DEA 1 prevalence in a canine population in Luanda (Angola) and to assess alloimmunization risk after a mismatched blood transfusion. Blood samples were typed using an immunochromatographic strip technique. Of the 112 dogs tested (59 males; 53 females), 52.68% were DEA 1 positive and 47.32% DEA 1 negative. Females tended to be DEA 1 positive, and males DEA 1 negative (<i>p</i> = 0.0085). In a first-time mismatched blood transfusion, the calculated probability of a dog becoming sensitized was 24.9% and the probability of an acute hemolytic reaction following a second incompatible blood transfusion was 6.21%. DEA 1 prevalence obtained was similar to that reported worldwide, but differs from other African countries. The risk of alloimmunization and acute hemolytic transfusion reactions in mismatched blood transfusions is higher than that in other African regions. Blood typing is recommended prior to transfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23694,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Sciences","volume":"11 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11090449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In dogs, the risk of an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction at the first transfusion is negligible; however, mismatched transfusions may produce alloimmunization. To avoid fatal acute hemolytic reactions in subsequent blood transfusions, it is important to recognize blood groups and to blood type both the donor and the recipient. Prevalence of dog blood groups varies geographically and between breeds. Our aim was to determine DEA 1 prevalence in a canine population in Luanda (Angola) and to assess alloimmunization risk after a mismatched blood transfusion. Blood samples were typed using an immunochromatographic strip technique. Of the 112 dogs tested (59 males; 53 females), 52.68% were DEA 1 positive and 47.32% DEA 1 negative. Females tended to be DEA 1 positive, and males DEA 1 negative (p = 0.0085). In a first-time mismatched blood transfusion, the calculated probability of a dog becoming sensitized was 24.9% and the probability of an acute hemolytic reaction following a second incompatible blood transfusion was 6.21%. DEA 1 prevalence obtained was similar to that reported worldwide, but differs from other African countries. The risk of alloimmunization and acute hemolytic transfusion reactions in mismatched blood transfusions is higher than that in other African regions. Blood typing is recommended prior to transfusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安哥拉罗安达省(撒哈拉以南非洲)两个市的狗血型 DEA 1。
对于狗来说,第一次输血时发生急性溶血性输血反应的风险微乎其微;但是,不匹配的输血可能会产生同种免疫。为了避免在以后的输血中发生致命的急性溶血反应,识别血型以及对献血者和受血者进行血型鉴定非常重要。狗的血型流行情况因地域和品种而异。我们的目的是确定罗安达(安哥拉)犬群中 DEA 1 的流行率,并评估不匹配输血后的同种免疫风险。我们使用免疫层析技术对血样进行了分型。在接受检测的 112 只狗(59 只雄性;53 只雌性)中,52.68% 呈 DEA 1 阳性,47.32% 呈 DEA 1 阴性。雌性倾向于 DEA 1 阳性,雄性倾向于 DEA 1 阴性(p = 0.0085)。在首次不匹配输血中,计算出的狗致敏的概率为 24.9%,而在第二次不匹配输血后发生急性溶血反应的概率为 6.21%。DEA 1 的流行率与全球报告的流行率相似,但与其他非洲国家不同。在不匹配输血中发生同种免疫和急性溶血性输血反应的风险高于其他非洲地区。建议在输血前进行血型鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
612
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Sciences is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original that are relevant to any field of veterinary sciences, including prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, disorder and injury in animals. This journal covers almost all topics related to animal health and veterinary medicine. Research fields of interest include but are not limited to: anaesthesiology anatomy bacteriology biochemistry cardiology dentistry dermatology embryology endocrinology epidemiology genetics histology immunology microbiology molecular biology mycology neurobiology oncology ophthalmology parasitology pathology pharmacology physiology radiology surgery theriogenology toxicology virology.
期刊最新文献
B-Flow and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Features of Subcutaneous Masses and Nodular Lesions in Dogs. In Situ Expression of Yak IL-22 in Mammary Glands as a Treatment for Bovine Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Mastitis in Mice. Electroencephalographic and Cardiovascular Assessments of Isoflurane-Anesthetized Dogs. Early Detection of Lumpy Skin Disease in Cattle Using Deep Learning-A Comparative Analysis of Pretrained Models. Effect of Using Prickly Pear Seed Cake (Opuntia ficus indica L.) on Growth Performance, Digestibility, Physiological and Histometric Parameters in Rabbits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1