Nursery- vs. Mother-Reared Baboons: Reproductive Success and Health Parameters.

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.3390/vetsci11090416
Sarah J Neal, Steven J Schapiro, Susan P Lambeth, Elizabeth R Magden
{"title":"Nursery- vs. Mother-Reared Baboons: Reproductive Success and Health Parameters.","authors":"Sarah J Neal, Steven J Schapiro, Susan P Lambeth, Elizabeth R Magden","doi":"10.3390/vetsci11090416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a plethora of data demonstrating the deleterious consequences of nursery rearing in nonhuman primates (NHPs). However, baboon studies report varying consequences of nursery rearing, from no differences in reproduction and sociality to moderate differences in social cognition and abnormal behavior. We compared health and reproductive parameters in a large sample (N= 231) of mother-reared (MR) and nursery-reared (NR) captive olive baboons housed at the Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, Texas. MR baboons had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and heart rates than NR baboons. Rearing was not a significant predictor of body condition score or body weight (<i>p</i> > 0.20), and MR and NR individuals did not differ in the level of wounding observed (<i>p</i> > 0.70). The proportion of successful births across NR and MR females was also not significantly different (<i>p</i> > 0.70), nor were rates of maternal neglect and infant death. These data suggest minimal differences in health and reproductive parameters across rearing statuses in baboons housed at this facility. In conjunction with previous research that also seems to show minimal differences as a function of rearing in baboons, but directly contrast with data in other NHP species, these data suggest that baboons may be more robust against deleterious effects of abnormal rearing conditions than other NHP species.</p>","PeriodicalId":23694,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Sciences","volume":"11 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11090416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a plethora of data demonstrating the deleterious consequences of nursery rearing in nonhuman primates (NHPs). However, baboon studies report varying consequences of nursery rearing, from no differences in reproduction and sociality to moderate differences in social cognition and abnormal behavior. We compared health and reproductive parameters in a large sample (N= 231) of mother-reared (MR) and nursery-reared (NR) captive olive baboons housed at the Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, Texas. MR baboons had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and heart rates than NR baboons. Rearing was not a significant predictor of body condition score or body weight (p > 0.20), and MR and NR individuals did not differ in the level of wounding observed (p > 0.70). The proportion of successful births across NR and MR females was also not significantly different (p > 0.70), nor were rates of maternal neglect and infant death. These data suggest minimal differences in health and reproductive parameters across rearing statuses in baboons housed at this facility. In conjunction with previous research that also seems to show minimal differences as a function of rearing in baboons, but directly contrast with data in other NHP species, these data suggest that baboons may be more robust against deleterious effects of abnormal rearing conditions than other NHP species.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保育狒狒与母养狒狒:繁殖成功率和健康参数。
大量数据表明,对非人灵长类动物(NHPs)进行育儿期饲养会产生有害后果。然而,对狒狒的研究报告却显示,育儿室饲养会造成不同的后果,有的在繁殖和社会性方面没有差异,有的则在社会认知和异常行为方面存在中度差异。我们比较了饲养在得克萨斯州基林比较医学研究中心的大样本(N= 231)母狒狒(MR)和保育狒狒(NR)的健康和繁殖参数。MR狒狒的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和心率均高于NR狒狒。饲养对身体状况评分或体重的预测作用不明显(p > 0.20),MR和NR个体在观察到的受伤程度上没有差异(p > 0.70)。NR雌性和MR雌性的成功分娩比例也没有显著差异(p > 0.70),母性疏忽率和婴儿死亡率也没有显著差异。这些数据表明,该设施饲养的狒狒在不同饲养状态下的健康和生殖参数差异极小。以前的研究似乎也表明,狒狒在不同饲养条件下的差异很小,但这些数据与其他非人灵长类物种的数据形成了直接对比,这些数据表明,狒狒可能比其他非人灵长类物种更能抵御异常饲养条件的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
612
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Sciences is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original that are relevant to any field of veterinary sciences, including prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, disorder and injury in animals. This journal covers almost all topics related to animal health and veterinary medicine. Research fields of interest include but are not limited to: anaesthesiology anatomy bacteriology biochemistry cardiology dentistry dermatology embryology endocrinology epidemiology genetics histology immunology microbiology molecular biology mycology neurobiology oncology ophthalmology parasitology pathology pharmacology physiology radiology surgery theriogenology toxicology virology.
期刊最新文献
B-Flow and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Features of Subcutaneous Masses and Nodular Lesions in Dogs. In Situ Expression of Yak IL-22 in Mammary Glands as a Treatment for Bovine Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Mastitis in Mice. Electroencephalographic and Cardiovascular Assessments of Isoflurane-Anesthetized Dogs. Early Detection of Lumpy Skin Disease in Cattle Using Deep Learning-A Comparative Analysis of Pretrained Models. Effect of Using Prickly Pear Seed Cake (Opuntia ficus indica L.) on Growth Performance, Digestibility, Physiological and Histometric Parameters in Rabbits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1