Effect of quantitative consciousness index on seizure parameters during electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.5498/wjp.v14.i9.1375
Bang-Shu Zhao, Bi Deng, Qi-Bin Chen, Xiao Li, You Yang, Su Min
{"title":"Effect of quantitative consciousness index on seizure parameters during electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder.","authors":"Bang-Shu Zhao, Bi Deng, Qi-Bin Chen, Xiao Li, You Yang, Su Min","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v14.i9.1375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is both an effective treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a noxious stimulus. Although some studies have explored the effect of sedation depth on seizure parameters in ECT, there is little research on the noxious stimulation response to ECT. In this study, we used two electroencephalography (EEG)-derived indices, the quantitative consciousness (qCON) index and quantitative nociceptive (qNOX) index, to monitor sedation, hypnosis, and noxious stimulation response in patients with MDD undergoing acute ECT.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of anesthesia depth based on the qCON and qNOX indices on seizure parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with MDD (<i>n</i> = 24) underwent acute bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia. Before ECT, the patients were randomly divided into three groups according to qCON scores (qCON60-70, qCON50-60, and qCON40-50). Continuous qCON monitoring was performed 3 minutes before and during ECT, and the qCON, qNOX, vital signs, EEG seizure parameters, and complications during the recovery period were recorded. The 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were evaluated before the first ECT session, after the fourth ECT session, and after the full course of ECT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 193 ECT sessions were performed on 24 participants. The qCON index significantly affected the EEG seizure duration, peak mid-ictal amplitude, and maximum heart rate during ECT (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The qNOX index significantly affected the post-ictal suppression index (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Age, number of ECT sessions, and anesthetic-ECT time intervals also had a significant effect on EEG seizure parameters (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in complications, 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale scores, or Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores among the three groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electrical stimulation at a qCON index of 60-70 resulted in better EEG seizure parameters without increasing complications in patients with MDD undergoing bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"14 9","pages":"1375-1385"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i9.1375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is both an effective treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a noxious stimulus. Although some studies have explored the effect of sedation depth on seizure parameters in ECT, there is little research on the noxious stimulation response to ECT. In this study, we used two electroencephalography (EEG)-derived indices, the quantitative consciousness (qCON) index and quantitative nociceptive (qNOX) index, to monitor sedation, hypnosis, and noxious stimulation response in patients with MDD undergoing acute ECT.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of anesthesia depth based on the qCON and qNOX indices on seizure parameters.

Methods: Patients with MDD (n = 24) underwent acute bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia. Before ECT, the patients were randomly divided into three groups according to qCON scores (qCON60-70, qCON50-60, and qCON40-50). Continuous qCON monitoring was performed 3 minutes before and during ECT, and the qCON, qNOX, vital signs, EEG seizure parameters, and complications during the recovery period were recorded. The 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were evaluated before the first ECT session, after the fourth ECT session, and after the full course of ECT.

Results: A total of 193 ECT sessions were performed on 24 participants. The qCON index significantly affected the EEG seizure duration, peak mid-ictal amplitude, and maximum heart rate during ECT (P < 0.05). The qNOX index significantly affected the post-ictal suppression index (P < 0.05). Age, number of ECT sessions, and anesthetic-ECT time intervals also had a significant effect on EEG seizure parameters (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in complications, 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale scores, or Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores among the three groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Electrical stimulation at a qCON index of 60-70 resulted in better EEG seizure parameters without increasing complications in patients with MDD undergoing bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量意识指数对重度抑郁症患者电休克治疗期间癫痫发作参数的影响。
背景:电休克疗法(ECT)既是治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的有效方法,也是一种有害刺激。虽然一些研究探讨了镇静深度对 ECT 癫痫发作参数的影响,但有关 ECT 的有害刺激反应的研究却很少。在这项研究中,我们使用了两种脑电图(EEG)得出的指数,即定量意识(qCON)指数和定量痛觉(qNOX)指数,来监测接受急性 ECT 的 MDD 患者的镇静、催眠和有害刺激反应:MDD 患者(n = 24)在异丙酚麻醉下接受急性双侧颞部 ECT。电痉挛疗法前,根据 qCON 评分(qCON60-70、qCON50-60 和 qCON40-50)将患者随机分为三组。在电痉挛治疗前 3 分钟和治疗过程中对患者的 qCON 进行连续监测,并记录恢复期的 qCON、qNOX、生命体征、脑电图发作参数和并发症。在第一次电痉挛治疗前、第四次电痉挛治疗后和整个电痉挛治疗疗程结束后,对24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表、Zung抑郁自评量表和蒙特利尔认知评估进行了评估:结果:共对 24 名参与者进行了 193 次电疗。qCON指数对ECT期间的脑电图发作持续时间、发作中期峰值振幅和最大心率有明显影响(P < 0.05)。qNOX 指数对发作后抑制指数有明显影响(P < 0.05)。年龄、ECT次数和麻醉-ECT时间间隔也对脑电图癫痫发作参数有显著影响(P < 0.05)。然而,三组患者在并发症、24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分、Zung抑郁自评量表评分或蒙特利尔认知评估评分方面没有明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:对于在异丙酚麻醉下接受双侧颞部电痉挛治疗的 MDD 患者,qCON 指数为 60-70 的电刺激可改善脑电图癫痫发作参数,且不会增加并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Challenges in the management of visual and tactile hallucinations in elderly people. Clinical value of combining epirubicin with mindfulness intervention in patients with urinary system tumors and depression. Association of stent thrombectomy and conventional treatment with neuroprotection, complications, anxiety, and depression in acute ischemic stroke patients. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor alterations and cognitive decline in schizophrenia: Implications for early intervention. Burden of mental disorders and risk factors in the Western Pacific region from 1990 to 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1