[The Experiences of Healthy Adults Participating in Advance Care Planning].

Q3 Nursing Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.6224/JN.202410_71(5).06
Shu-Yi Fan, Chi-Yin Kao
{"title":"[The Experiences of Healthy Adults Participating in Advance Care Planning].","authors":"Shu-Yi Fan, Chi-Yin Kao","doi":"10.6224/JN.202410_71(5).06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After enactment of the Patient Right to Autonomy Act in Taiwan, most of the individuals participating in advance care planning (ACP) and signing advance decisions (AD) have been healthy adults. This demographic is inadequately covered in the literature, in which related studies focus primarily on individuals with major illnesses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was implemented to understand the experiences of healthy adults participating in ACP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was taken and participants were recruited from ACP outpatient clinics in three hospitals in northern, central, and southern Taiwan. All of the participants were healthy adults who had completed the ACP process, did not have a major illness, had no psychiatric diagnoses, and could express themselves clearly. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 participants were interviewed, generating three major themes: \"Establishing the foundations of ACP\", \"Preserving dignity in end-of-life care\", and \"Key elements for successful ACP\". Their motivation to engage in ACP and sign the AD form was influenced by past experiences and a desire to maintain dignity and physical autonomy through the aging process. Their decision-making processes were influenced by family opinions, sociocultural factors, and systemic dynamics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions / implications for practice: </strong>During the ACP and AD signing process, the consulting team not only helps healthy adults successfully provide informed consent but also, by fostering a supportive communication environment, ensures medical preferences and expectations are accurately reflected, thus promoting mutual care, support, and understanding among all parties.</p>","PeriodicalId":35672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202410_71(5).06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After enactment of the Patient Right to Autonomy Act in Taiwan, most of the individuals participating in advance care planning (ACP) and signing advance decisions (AD) have been healthy adults. This demographic is inadequately covered in the literature, in which related studies focus primarily on individuals with major illnesses.

Purpose: This study was implemented to understand the experiences of healthy adults participating in ACP.

Methods: A qualitative approach was taken and participants were recruited from ACP outpatient clinics in three hospitals in northern, central, and southern Taiwan. All of the participants were healthy adults who had completed the ACP process, did not have a major illness, had no psychiatric diagnoses, and could express themselves clearly. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis.

Results: A total of 15 participants were interviewed, generating three major themes: "Establishing the foundations of ACP", "Preserving dignity in end-of-life care", and "Key elements for successful ACP". Their motivation to engage in ACP and sign the AD form was influenced by past experiences and a desire to maintain dignity and physical autonomy through the aging process. Their decision-making processes were influenced by family opinions, sociocultural factors, and systemic dynamics.

Conclusions / implications for practice: During the ACP and AD signing process, the consulting team not only helps healthy adults successfully provide informed consent but also, by fostering a supportive communication environment, ensures medical preferences and expectations are accurately reflected, thus promoting mutual care, support, and understanding among all parties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[健康成年人参与预先护理规划的经历]。
背景:台湾颁布《病人自主权法》后,大多数参与预先医疗计划(ACP)和签署预先决定(AD)的人都是健康的成年人。目的:本研究旨在了解健康成年人参与 ACP 的经历:方法:采用定性方法,从台湾北部、中部和南部三家医院的 ACP 门诊招募参与者。所有参与者均为已完成 ACP 过程的健康成年人,无重大疾病,无精神病诊断,能清楚地表达自己的观点。数据通过半结构式访谈收集,并采用内容分析法进行分析:共有 15 名参与者接受了访谈,产生了三大主题:结果:共访谈了 15 名参与者,得出了三大主题:"建立 ACP 的基础"、"在临终关怀中维护尊严 "和 "成功 ACP 的关键因素"。他们参与 ACP 和签署 AD 表格的动机受到过去经历的影响,并希望在衰老过程中保持尊严和身体自主性。他们的决策过程受到家庭意见、社会文化因素和系统动态的影响:在签署 ACP 和 AD 的过程中,咨询团队不仅要帮助健康成年人成功提供知情同意,还要通过营造支持性的沟通环境,确保医疗偏好和期望得到准确反映,从而促进各方之间的相互关怀、支持和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nursing
Journal of Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
[A Guide to Network Meta-Analysis Using Generative AI and No-Code Tools]. [A Study on the Life Attitudes, Fear of Death, and Dying Care Abilities of Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Institutions]. [Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Fall Prevention Program Incorporating an Interprofessional Team Collaboration Model on Reducing Fall Risk in Elderly Living in Long-term Care Facilities]. [Application of Artificial Intelligence Models in Nursing Research]. [Caregiving Experience With a Young Father With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Renal Dialysis and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1