Outcomes of corticosteroid therapy in patients with viral community-acquired pneumonia.

IF 8.5 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pneumonia Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1186/s41479-024-00146-8
Catia Cilloniz, Amedeo Guzzardella, Davide Calabretta, Albert Gabarrus, Maria Angeles Marcos, Antoni Torres
{"title":"Outcomes of corticosteroid therapy in patients with viral community-acquired pneumonia.","authors":"Catia Cilloniz, Amedeo Guzzardella, Davide Calabretta, Albert Gabarrus, Maria Angeles Marcos, Antoni Torres","doi":"10.1186/s41479-024-00146-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the therapeutic effects of corticosteroids in adult patients hospitalized with viral community-acquired pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from November 1996 to June 2024. All adult patients with viral community-acquired pneumonia were enrolled. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, length of ICU and hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, and 1-year mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to obtain balance among the baseline variables in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 524 patients with viral pneumonia, 30 (6%) received corticosteroids and 494 (94%) did not. Patients were primarily male (n = 299, 57%), with a median [Q1-Q3] age of 66.9 [55-81] years. The 3:1 propensity matching procedure identified 90 patients not treated with corticosteroid (CS-) as controls. After PSM, no difference in 30-day mortality was found [7% (95%CI 1 to 22%) vs. 4% (95%CI 1 to 11%), p = 0.639]. The risk of death at 30 days did not differ significantly in unmatched and matched cohorts [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.33 (0.32-5.63), p = 0.695 vs. HR 1.51 (0.28-8.27), p = 0.632, respectively]. Nor were differences found in hospital length of stay, ICU admission and length of stay, or mechanical ventilation requirement and duration between matched and unmatched CS + and CS-.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes regarding the use of corticosteroids in patients with viral pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45120,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonia","volume":"16 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-024-00146-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the therapeutic effects of corticosteroids in adult patients hospitalized with viral community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from November 1996 to June 2024. All adult patients with viral community-acquired pneumonia were enrolled. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, length of ICU and hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, and 1-year mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to obtain balance among the baseline variables in the two groups.

Results: Of the 524 patients with viral pneumonia, 30 (6%) received corticosteroids and 494 (94%) did not. Patients were primarily male (n = 299, 57%), with a median [Q1-Q3] age of 66.9 [55-81] years. The 3:1 propensity matching procedure identified 90 patients not treated with corticosteroid (CS-) as controls. After PSM, no difference in 30-day mortality was found [7% (95%CI 1 to 22%) vs. 4% (95%CI 1 to 11%), p = 0.639]. The risk of death at 30 days did not differ significantly in unmatched and matched cohorts [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.33 (0.32-5.63), p = 0.695 vs. HR 1.51 (0.28-8.27), p = 0.632, respectively]. Nor were differences found in hospital length of stay, ICU admission and length of stay, or mechanical ventilation requirement and duration between matched and unmatched CS + and CS-.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the primary and secondary outcomes regarding the use of corticosteroids in patients with viral pneumonia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病毒性社区获得性肺炎患者接受皮质类固醇治疗的效果。
目的:本研究旨在评估皮质类固醇对因病毒性社区获得性肺炎住院的成人患者的治疗效果:本研究对 1996 年 11 月至 2024 年 6 月期间收集的前瞻性数据进行了回顾性分析。所有患有病毒性社区获得性肺炎的成人患者均被纳入研究。主要结果是 30 天死亡率。次要结局包括全因院内死亡率、入住重症监护室、重症监护室和住院时间、机械通气和 1 年死亡率。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)来平衡两组患者的基线变量:在 524 名病毒性肺炎患者中,30 人(6%)接受了皮质类固醇治疗,494 人(94%)未接受治疗。患者主要为男性(n = 299,57%),中位年龄[Q1-Q3]为 66.9 [55-81] 岁。通过 3:1 倾向匹配程序确定了 90 名未接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者(CS-)作为对照组。经过倾向匹配后,发现30天死亡率无差异[7%(95%CI 1-22%) vs. 4%(95%CI 1-11%),p = 0.639]。未配对队列和配对队列的 30 天死亡风险差异不大[危险比 (HR) 分别为 1.33 (0.32-5.63),p = 0.695 vs. HR 1.51 (0.28-8.27),p = 0.632]。在住院时间、入住 ICU 和住院时间、机械通气需求和持续时间方面,配对和未配对的 CS + 和 CS- 之间也未发现差异:病毒性肺炎患者使用皮质类固醇的主要和次要结果没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumonia
Pneumonia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
1.50%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Can clinical findings at admission allow withholding of antibiotics in patients hospitalized for community acquired pneumonia when a test for a respiratory virus is positive? Mortality reduction with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pre-vaccination carriage prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes among internally displaced people in Somaliland: a cross-sectional study. Community versus academic hospital community-acquired pneumonia patients: a nested cohort study. Oxygenation indices and early prediction of outcome in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring noninvasive respiratory support in pulmonary intermediate care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1