Can clinical findings at admission allow withholding of antibiotics in patients hospitalized for community acquired pneumonia when a test for a respiratory virus is positive?

IF 8.5 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pneumonia Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1186/s41479-024-00153-9
Ryan Ward, Alejandro J Gonzalez, Justin A Kahla, Daniel M Musher
{"title":"Can clinical findings at admission allow withholding of antibiotics in patients hospitalized for community acquired pneumonia when a test for a respiratory virus is positive?","authors":"Ryan Ward, Alejandro J Gonzalez, Justin A Kahla, Daniel M Musher","doi":"10.1186/s41479-024-00153-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend empiric antibiotic therapy for patients who require hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We sought to determine whether clinical, imaging or laboratory features in patients hospitalized for CAP in whom PCR is positive for a respiratory virus enable exclusion of bacterial coinfection so that antibiotics can be withheld.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this prospective study, we selected patients in whom an etiologic diagnosis was likely to be reached, namely those who provided a high-quality sputum sample at or shortly after admission, and in whom PCR was done to test for a respiratory virus. We performed quantitative bacteriologic studies on sputum to determine the presence of bacterial infection or coinfection and reviewed all clinical, imaging and laboratory studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 122 CAP patients studied, 77 (63.1%) had bacterial infection, 16 (13.1%) viral infection, and 29 (23.8%) bacterial/viral coinfection. Underlying pulmonary disease and a history of smoking were more common in bacterial pneumonia. Upper respiratory symptoms were more common, and mean white blood cell (WBC) counts were lower viral pneumonia. Nevertheless, no clinical, laboratory or imaging findings allowed exclusion of bacterial coinfection in patients who tested positive for a respiratory virus. In fact, patients with bacterial/viral coinfection were sicker than those with bacterial or viral pneumonia; 30% were admitted required transfer to the ICU during their hospital course, compared to 17% and 19% of patients with bacterial or viral infection, respectively (p < .05). In this study, 64.4% of patients who tested positive for a respiratory virus had a bacterial coinfection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If a test for a respiratory virus test is positive in a patient hospitalized for CAP, no sufficiently differentiating features exclude bacterial coinfection, thereby supporting the recommendation that empiric antibiotics be administered to all patients who are sufficiently ill to require hospitalization for CAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":45120,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonia","volume":"17 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-024-00153-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend empiric antibiotic therapy for patients who require hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We sought to determine whether clinical, imaging or laboratory features in patients hospitalized for CAP in whom PCR is positive for a respiratory virus enable exclusion of bacterial coinfection so that antibiotics can be withheld.

Methods: For this prospective study, we selected patients in whom an etiologic diagnosis was likely to be reached, namely those who provided a high-quality sputum sample at or shortly after admission, and in whom PCR was done to test for a respiratory virus. We performed quantitative bacteriologic studies on sputum to determine the presence of bacterial infection or coinfection and reviewed all clinical, imaging and laboratory studies.

Results: Of 122 CAP patients studied, 77 (63.1%) had bacterial infection, 16 (13.1%) viral infection, and 29 (23.8%) bacterial/viral coinfection. Underlying pulmonary disease and a history of smoking were more common in bacterial pneumonia. Upper respiratory symptoms were more common, and mean white blood cell (WBC) counts were lower viral pneumonia. Nevertheless, no clinical, laboratory or imaging findings allowed exclusion of bacterial coinfection in patients who tested positive for a respiratory virus. In fact, patients with bacterial/viral coinfection were sicker than those with bacterial or viral pneumonia; 30% were admitted required transfer to the ICU during their hospital course, compared to 17% and 19% of patients with bacterial or viral infection, respectively (p < .05). In this study, 64.4% of patients who tested positive for a respiratory virus had a bacterial coinfection.

Conclusions: If a test for a respiratory virus test is positive in a patient hospitalized for CAP, no sufficiently differentiating features exclude bacterial coinfection, thereby supporting the recommendation that empiric antibiotics be administered to all patients who are sufficiently ill to require hospitalization for CAP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入院时的临床结果是否允许社区获得性肺炎住院患者在呼吸道病毒检测呈阳性时停用抗生素?
背景:目前的指南建议对因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)需要住院治疗的患者进行经验性抗生素治疗。我们试图确定呼吸道病毒PCR阳性的CAP住院患者的临床、影像学或实验室特征是否能够排除细菌合并感染,从而可以不使用抗生素。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,我们选择了可能达到病原学诊断的患者,即在入院时或入院后不久提供高质量痰样本的患者,并对其进行了PCR检测呼吸道病毒。我们对痰液进行了定量细菌学研究,以确定细菌感染或合并感染的存在,并回顾了所有临床、影像学和实验室研究。结果:122例CAP患者中,细菌感染77例(63.1%),病毒感染16例(13.1%),细菌/病毒合并感染29例(23.8%)。潜在肺部疾病和吸烟史在细菌性肺炎中更为常见。上呼吸道症状更为常见,平均白细胞(WBC)计数较低。然而,在呼吸道病毒检测呈阳性的患者中,没有临床、实验室或影像学检查结果可以排除细菌合并感染。事实上,细菌/病毒合并感染的患者比细菌性或病毒性肺炎患者病情更严重;30%的住院患者需要在住院期间转至ICU,而细菌或病毒感染患者的这一比例分别为17%和19% (p)结论:如果因CAP住院的患者呼吸道病毒检测呈阳性,则没有充分的区分特征可以排除细菌合并感染,因此支持对所有病情严重到需要因CAP住院的患者使用经验性抗生素的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumonia
Pneumonia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
1.50%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of COVID-19 in the Omicron-predominant wave: large-scale real-world data analysis with a comparison to influenza. Commonly prescribed medications and risk of pneumonia and all-cause mortality in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a UK population-based cohort study. Can clinical findings at admission allow withholding of antibiotics in patients hospitalized for community acquired pneumonia when a test for a respiratory virus is positive? Mortality reduction with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pre-vaccination carriage prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes among internally displaced people in Somaliland: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1